中美高校道德教育之当代比较研究
本文选题:中美 切入点:高校道德教育 出处:《陕西师范大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:道德教育是高等学校教育的重要内容,是培养具有较高思想道德素质、符合社会需要的合格人才的重要环节,是世界各国共同关注的领域之一。由于政治制度、经济制度、历史文化传统等方面的差异,中美两国道德教育的开展各具特色。因此,本文采用专题比较的方法,以中国和美国高校道德教育作为比较研究的对象,关注双方道德教育中存在的共同问题,以期在比较中取人之长、补己之短,同时发挥我国道德教育的优秀传统,进而对促进我国高校道德教育有所启示和借鉴。全文由五章组成,共分为四个部分: 第一章即绪论部分,主要对论文研究意义、国内外研究现状、研究内容与方法以及创新与不足进行简要式说明。 第二章是理论阐释部分,主要阐释道德教育的内涵、原则,对道德教育与德育、思想政治教育、公民道德教育进行概念厘清,界定道德教育的范畴。 第三、四、五章是本文的重点和主体部分,通过道德教育的目标、内容和途径三个方面的比较研究,总结中美两国高校在道德教育目标、道德教育内容和道德教育途径上的共性和差异性,并提出了可供借鉴的启示:在道德教育目标上必须坚持正确的政治方向,重新审视并确立道德教育目标的侧重点,积极探索层次分明的道德教育目标体系;在道德教育内容上,应积极强化集体观念教育、爱国主义教育和公民权利与义务意识教育;在道德教育途径上,要构建主体性道德教育模式,营造积极健康的道德教育环境,突显道德教育的实践性和服务性。 结语是本文的第四部分,是我在比较、总结的基础上,结合思想政治教育专业相关理论和论文写作过程中的思考,对高校道德教育的理论体系和实践体系的建设提出自己的观点,以引起全社会对高校道德教育发展的关注和重视,共同促进高校道德教育的发展. 本文认为在中美高校道德教育的比较研究中,不应以单纯的比较为目的,比较的目的在于启示,比较的真正意义在于提高;同时在比较的启示上,不应只突出我国对美国成功经验的借鉴,同样应突出我国道德教育的优良传统和成功经验。也就是说,比较是相互的,借鉴是相互的,这也就是本文的最大价值所在。同时,社会在发展,时代在变化,比较分析的具体结论不是一成不变的。我们必须拓宽视野,使我国高校道德教育融入世界、走向世界,从世界各国道德教育的发展中汲取有益营养,同时向世界各国展示我国高校道德教育的成功经验,促进道德教育的国际化发展。
[Abstract]:Moral education is an important part of higher education, is to cultivate high moral quality, an important part of the qualified personnel for the needs of the society, is one of the common concern of all countries in the world. Because of the political system, economic system, different historical and cultural traditions and other aspects of the two countries, Sino US to carry out moral education have their own characteristics. Therefore, this paper the subject comparison, the moral education in Colleges and universities Chinese and America as the object of comparative research, pay close attention to the common problems of both sides in moral education, in order to take in the comparison, fill our own short, and exert the excellent traditional moral education of our country, and to promote the inspiration and reference of our moral education in Colleges and universities. The thesis consists of five chapters, is divided into four parts:
The first chapter, the introduction part, is a brief description of the significance of the research, the research status at home and abroad, the research content and methods, and the innovation and deficiency.
The second chapter is the theoretical interpretation part, mainly explaining the connotation and principles of moral education, clarifying the concept of moral education and moral education, ideological and political education, civic moral education, and defining the scope of moral education.
Third, fourth, the five chapter is the main body part of this article, through the moral education goal, a comparative study of the three aspects of the content and method, summary of Sino US university moral education goal, similarities and differences of the content of moral education and moral education way, and offers some enlightenment: the goal of moral education we must adhere to the correct political orientation, re-examine and establish the goal of moral education focus, and actively explore the moral education target system hierarchy; the content of moral education, we should strengthen the concept of collective education, patriotic education and the rights and duties of citizens awareness education; in the approach of moral education, to construct the model of moral education the main body, to create a positive and healthy environment of moral education, highlighting the practicality of moral education and service.
The conclusion is the fourth part of this paper, I compare, on the basis of summing up, based on the thinking of the ideological and political education theory and the process of writing the paper, put forward their views to construct the theoretical system and practice system of moral education in Colleges and universities, to attract the attention of the whole society and attach great importance to the development of the moral education in Colleges and universities, together to promote the development of moral education in Colleges and universities.
This paper argues that in the comparative study of the moral education in Colleges and universities, should not be a simple comparison for the purpose of comparison is to compare the true meaning of enlightenment, is to improve; and in the comparison enlightenment, we should not only focus on our country to draw lessons from the successful experience of the United States, the fine tradition and successful experience should be equally prominent in China moral education. That is to say, the comparison is mutual, from each other, this is the biggest value of this paper. At the same time, with the development of society, in the era of change, specific conclusions comparative analysis is not immutable and frozen. We must broaden their horizons, make our moral education into the world, to the world. We can learn more from the development of moral education in the world, and show the successful experience of moral education in Colleges and universities in China to the world, to promote the moral education and international development.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G641
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨清荣;儒家义利观解读[J];道德与文明;2005年01期
2 庄穗;对集体主义价值观的新思考——兼与个人主义价值观的比较和反思[J];福建省社会主义学院学报;2002年04期
3 金瑾如;中美高校德育共同性与特殊性比较分析[J];广西青年干部学院学报;2003年03期
4 但昭伟;;以“权利语言与最低要求道德”为核心的道德教育[J];中国德育;2006年05期
5 张佐;中西道德教育比较──兼论我国新时期德育改革[J];杭州师范学院学报;1994年01期
6 周兆龙;中美高校学生德育途径比较初探[J];江西社会科学;2002年12期
7 心远;在碰撞中产生能量──杨振宁教授答问录[J];科技导报;1994年07期
8 刘小强;蒋喜锋;;质量战略下的课程改革——20世纪80年代以来美国本科教育顶点课程的改革发展[J];清华大学教育研究;2010年02期
9 唐汉卫;多元文化视景中的美国道德教育[J];当代教育科学;2005年18期
10 邓才彪;浅谈道德教育他律与自律的问题[J];山东师大学报(社会科学版);1997年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 戴静;中美学校德育的比较及对中国学校德育的启示[D];华中师范大学;2004年
2 郑红莺;美国学校德育途径方法借鉴研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
3 王宏伟;美国高校德育及其对我国的启示[D];东北师范大学;2008年
4 兰小凯;中美高校道德教育比较研究[D];延边大学;2010年
,本文编号:1687077
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/1687077.html