湖南大学教师科研绩效考核研究
发布时间:2018-05-18 05:04
本文选题:科研绩效考核 + 教师评价 ; 参考:《湖南大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:当今高等院校都把提高人才培养质量、提升科学研究水平、增强社会服务能力作为高校的三大职能,对于不同类型的高校侧重点也不尽相同。论文选取了一所全国性重点大学湖南大学作为研究对象,湖南大学是一所综合性研究型大学,科学研究管理在学校的日常管理工作中占有重要比重。所以,如何发挥科研绩效评价对学校科研工作的促进作用,使绩效考核更好地服务于学校发展目标对湖南大学的整个管理体制意义重大。论文以此为切入点,查阅大量相关文献和资料,采用对湖南大学相关教师进行问卷调查和集中采访的方式,,运用定性与定量的分析方法,全面研究了湖南大学科研绩效考核评估体系的现状及意义、目前存在的问题和改进的措施。论文首先阐述了湖南大学现行的评价体系具有明确的目标并且符合学校的长远发展规划;然后适时提出学校科研评价指标存在教学与科研考核比例失调、量化标准和评价标准的针对性不强、青年教师的科研能力需要加强等问题并对原因进行深入地剖析;接着针对论文反映的问题进一步提出学校层面应对科研绩效考核思想上重视、组织上加强学术道德建设以确保学术自由、实施上加强指标的针对性,特别是促进青年教师的发展等具体改进措施;最后论文对全文主要的研究内容和研究成果进行了总结,对论文研究中存在的困惑和不足进行了说明,并对今后如何开展科研绩效考核工作进行了展望,提出每所高校都应该摸索适合本校教师的科研绩效评估体系,找出最有效的考核体系。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, colleges and universities regard improving the quality of talents training, improving the level of scientific research and enhancing the ability of social service as the three functions of colleges and universities, with different emphases on different types of colleges and universities. The thesis selects a national key university Hunan University as the research object. Hunan University is a comprehensive research university. Scientific research management plays an important role in the daily management of the university. Therefore, it is of great significance for the management system of Hunan University to give full play to the promotion of scientific research performance evaluation to the scientific research work, and to make the performance appraisal serve the development goal of the school better. This paper regards this as the breakthrough point, referring to a large number of relevant documents and materials, adopting the way of questionnaire survey and centralized interview to the relevant teachers of Hunan University, using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. This paper studies the present situation and significance of the evaluation system of scientific research performance in Hunan University, the existing problems and the measures to improve it. This paper first expounds that the current evaluation system of Hunan University has clear goals and conforms to the long-term development plan of the university, and then points out that there is a imbalance between teaching and scientific research assessment in the evaluation index of school scientific research. The pertinence of the quantitative standard and evaluation standard is not strong, the young teachers' scientific research ability needs to be strengthened, and the reasons are analyzed deeply. Then, aiming at the problems reflected in the paper, the author puts forward that the school should pay more attention to the evaluation of scientific research performance, strengthen the construction of academic morality in order to ensure academic freedom, and strengthen the pertinence of the indicators. Especially to promote the development of young teachers and other specific improvement measures. Finally, the paper summarizes the main research content and research results, and explains the puzzles and shortcomings in the research. This paper also looks forward to how to carry out the evaluation of scientific research performance in the future, and puts forward that each university should explore the scientific research performance evaluation system suitable for its teachers, and find out the most effective assessment system.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G645.1;G644
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李子彦;;关于当前高校教师科研业绩评价有效性的思考[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
2 武向荣;;教师科研绩效激励机制研究——基于新制度经济学的视角[J];教师教育研究;2009年06期
3 董志峰;;高校年终考核存在的问题与对策研究[J];高教论坛;2006年02期
4 孙二军;;大学的分化与科研的定位[J];高教探索;2008年06期
5 杨丽霞;简毓峰;;国内外高校科研绩效评价研究综述[J];甘肃高师学报;2007年05期
6 范文曜,张伟;英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J];理工高教研究;2003年06期
7 胡金秀,周国强,张炳烛,赵建华,李晓华,张英杰;高校教师科研工作量化考核体系的建立与实践[J];经济师;2003年10期
8 齐晶晶;;浅析我国高校人文社会科学教师科研绩效评价的变革[J];现代教育科学;2009年11期
9 张敏;;对高校教师科研业绩量化指标设计的思考[J];金融教学与研究;2010年02期
10 张将星;王占军;;美国高校教师绩效评价:主体、内容与方法[J];中国大学教学;2011年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王勇明;中国高校教师激励机制实证研究[D];南京农业大学;2007年
本文编号:1904499
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/1904499.html