制度理论视野中的大学行政化研究

发布时间：2018-06-19 08:22

本文选题：行政化 + 大学治理　；参考：《大连理工大学》2012年博士论文

【摘要】：学术权力和行政权力影响大学最基本权力形态,都具有各自的合理性,当行政权力在大学运行中,超出了自己的合法、合理边界,代替了学术权力发挥绝对的主导作用时就形成了大学管理的行政化。大学行政化本质上是对大学制度体系整体特征的一种概括,行政化表明现有大学制度是以行政为本位、为导向、为中心制度体系。从制度系统论的视角观察,行政化的主要构成是以体制为核心的正式制度、以观念为核心的非正式制度、以命令—执行为核心的实施机制等三个方面。进行去行政化改革是因为行政化违背了大学组织的学术性、契约性和伦理性三个重要组织特征及其治理要求。并且行政化造成了大学治理结构失衡,不利市场发挥作用,在资源与价值导向上影响学术生态,可能诱发教育制度伦理和腐败问题,不利于教师员工民主管理制度建设。去行政化改革的提出,表明以行政化为特征的大学制度体系在权力结构、利益博弈和生产力发展三方面处于的非均衡状态。导致大学行政化的因素可以划分为两类,一类是原理性、普遍性和机制性因素,另一类是条件性、特殊性和偶然性因素。路径依赖机制、资源依赖机制和公共选择机制是组织运行的三大原理。大学之所以行政化是因为这些原理的存在,同时中国现实也满足了这些原理发挥作用的条件。利益博弈是大学去行政化改革的基本原理,所以只有处理好改革过程中得利益关系,才能实现去行政化改革的目标。去行政化制度变迁是一种整体性制度变迁,主要变迁方式是渐进性和强制性。这一改革虽具有客观必然性,但也具有长期性、复杂性,甚至会具有迂回反复的特点。大学去行政化改革是我国高等教育体制改革的重要战略举措,其目标定位是探索一种符合大学组织特征、符合教育规律和管理规律的大学治理方式,从而实现大学治理模式的转型、升级和优化。大学去行政化改革可以通过转变政府职能,落实和扩大高校办学自主权、完善大学校长等行政岗位选拔办法、完善学术委员会制度,探索教授治学的有效途径和加强章程建设,建立健全权力监督和制衡机制等措施进行。
[Abstract]:Academic power and administrative power affect the most basic forms of university power, both have their own rationality, when the administrative power in the university operation, beyond their own legal, reasonable boundary, Instead of academic power to play an absolute leading role, the formation of university administration. The nature of university administration is a generalization of the overall characteristics of the university system, which indicates that the existing university system is administration-oriented, oriented and central system. From the perspective of institutional system theory, the main composition of the administrative system is the formal system with the system as the core, the informal system with the concept as the core, and the implementation mechanism with the command-execution as the core. The reason for the deadministrative reform is that it violates the academic, contractual and ethical characteristics of the university organization and its governance requirements. Moreover, the administrative system causes the imbalance of the university governance structure, unfavorable to the function of the market, influences the academic ecology in the resource and value orientation, may induce the problems of education system ethics and corruption, and is not conducive to the construction of the democratic management system of teachers and employees. The proposal of deadministrative reform shows that the university system characterized by administration is in an unbalanced state in three aspects: power structure, benefit game and productivity development. The factors leading to the university administration can be divided into two categories, one is the principle, the universality and the mechanism, the other is the condition, particularity and contingency. Path-dependent mechanism, resource-dependent mechanism and public choice mechanism are the three principles of organization operation. The administration of universities is due to the existence of these principles, and the reality of China also meets the conditions for these principles to function. The interest game is the basic principle of the deadministrative reform of the university, so the goal of the deadministrative reform can be realized only by dealing with the relationship between the interests in the process of the reform. De-administration institutional change is a holistic institutional change, the main way of change is gradual and mandatory. Although this reform has the objective inevitability, but also has the long-term, the complexity, may even have the circuitous characteristic. The reform of university deadministration is an important strategic measure in the reform of higher education system in China. Its goal is to explore a kind of university governance that conforms to the characteristics of university organization, educational law and management law. So as to achieve the transformation of university governance model, upgrading and optimization. The reform of university deadministration can, by transforming government functions, implementing and expanding the autonomy of running a university, perfecting the methods of selecting university presidents and other administrative posts, perfecting the system of academic committees, exploring effective ways of teaching and studying, and strengthening the construction of articles of association. Establish and improve the power supervision and checks and balances mechanism and other measures.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G647

【相似文献】