我国高等学校内外部绩效评价分析及应用研究

发布时间：2018-09-09 16:22

【摘要】：高等学校的绩效评价是国内外学者关注研究的重要焦点之一,资源相对总是稀缺的,如何采取积极得力的措施引导高校优化资源配置已成为教育界不断探索的永恒课题。中央高校预算拨款制度改革工作的全面启动实施和国家教育改革发展的不断要求,都使得我国高等教育资源配置的重要性与日俱增。本文以高等学校的内外部绩效评价为研究主体,在广泛查阅文献资料及分析意义和背景的基础上,分析了国内外学术界对高校绩效评价的研究情况,并对目前存在的问题与不足进行了分析。从利益相关者、委托代理、资源依赖和问责理论等基本原理入手,详细研究了高校的人力投入、财力投入和物力投入及相应的教学产出、科研产出和社会服务产出。建立了基于广义工作中心的高等学校绩效评价层次结构:在高校工作中心层,以CORPS模式为基础,通过主成分分析和数据包络分析的组合集成建立了高校外部绩效评价的数学模型,以2008年24所教育部直属理工类高校为例进行了评价研究;在高校广义工作中心层,建立了基于BSC的高校内部绩效评价体系,通过模糊综合评价、因子分析和数据包络分析的组合集成建立了高校内部绩效评价的数学模型,以2008年T大学18个学院为例进行了分析研究,将外部绩效和内部绩效的评价结论综合分析提出了改进措施和建议目标。本文的主要创新点体现在以下四个方面: 1.从宏观层面将高校的外部绩效与内部绩效进行整合,做了较为全面、系统的综合性研究。引入了广义工作中心的概念与方法,据此将高等学校的绩效划分为外部绩效和内部绩效的两个组成部分,并分析和探讨了二者之间的区别和联系。 2.以理工类大学为例,分别建立了基于CORPS和BSC的高校外部及内部绩效评价体系。 3.通过主成分分析、模糊综合评价法、因子分析和数据包络分析等方法的组合集成建立了高校外部及内部绩效评价的数学模型。 4.将学生满意度、教学质量和社会声誉等定性指标纳入绩效评价体系,实现了高校产出定性指标的量化。
[Abstract]:The performance evaluation of colleges and universities is one of the important focus of scholars at home and abroad, resources are relatively scarce, how to take active and effective measures to guide the optimization of resources allocation has become an eternal topic in the educational circles. The overall implementation of the reform of the central university budget allocation system and the continuous requirements of the development of the national education reform make the allocation of higher education resources in our country increasingly important. This paper takes the internal and external performance evaluation of colleges and universities as the main body of study, on the basis of extensively consulting the literature and analyzing the significance and background, analyzes the research situation of the academic circles at home and abroad on the performance evaluation of colleges and universities. The existing problems and shortcomings are analyzed. Starting with the basic principles of stakeholders, principal-agent, resource dependence and accountability theory, this paper studies in detail the human, financial and material inputs of colleges and universities, as well as the corresponding teaching output, scientific research output and social service output. The performance evaluation hierarchy of colleges and universities based on the generalized work center is established. In the work center layer of the university, the model of CORPS is used as the foundation. Through the combination integration of principal component analysis and data envelopment analysis, the mathematical model of external performance evaluation of colleges and universities is established, and the evaluation research is carried out in 24 universities directly affiliated to the Ministry of Education in 2008. The internal performance evaluation system of colleges and universities based on BSC is established. Through the combination of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, factor analysis and data envelopment analysis, the mathematical model of internal performance evaluation of colleges and universities is established. Taking 18 colleges of T University in 2008 as an example, the paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation conclusions of external and internal performance and puts forward the improvement measures and suggestions. The main innovations of this paper are as follows: 1. This paper integrates the external performance and internal performance of colleges and universities from the macro level, and makes a comprehensive and systematic study. This paper introduces the concept and method of generalized work center, according to which the performance of colleges and universities is divided into two parts: external performance and internal performance, and the difference and relationship between them are analyzed and discussed. 2. Taking the universities of science and engineering as an example, the external and internal performance evaluation systems of universities based on CORPS and BSC are established respectively. 3. Through the combination and integration of principal component analysis, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, factor analysis and data envelopment analysis, the mathematical models of external and internal performance evaluation of colleges and universities are established. 4. The qualitative indicators such as student satisfaction, teaching quality and social reputation are incorporated into the performance evaluation system to realize the quantification of the qualitative indicators of university output.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G647

【相似文献】