基于结构方程模型的甘肃省本科院校大学教师专业化成长因素满意度测评
[Abstract]:How to train high-quality talents more effectively is the most urgent problem we need to solve. As we all know, the main factor that influences the quality of higher education is the behavior of university teachers besides government behavior and school behavior. College teachers are the most direct influence on students' learning and life, and the key to students' mental improvement. Therefore, the professional growth of university teachers directly determines the quality of talents cultivated in colleges and universities. Therefore, it is the most effective and direct way to improve the quality of education by improving the satisfaction degree of college teachers' professional growth. Through the research of many scholars at home and abroad, it is concluded that the satisfaction degree of professional role, professional knowledge, professional ability and professional spirit are the main factors influencing the satisfaction of professional growth of university teachers. Professional development satisfaction and professional organization satisfaction. From the perspective of professional role satisfaction, it includes the satisfaction of university teachers with their professional identity and professional status, and directly shows whether university teachers approve of their current talent training and scientific research. Social services and the role of cultural inheritors also demonstrate the satisfaction of college teachers with their salaries, benefits, and social status. From the perspective of professional knowledge and professional ability satisfaction, the degree of satisfaction in these two aspects can basically explain whether they can affect the students' life learning and ability development. If the satisfaction degree is high, the student benefit is big, the satisfaction degree is low, then the student benefit is small. Through the degree of professional satisfaction, we can see whether a university teacher is loyal to his major, position and students, and can also reflect whether he is satisfied with his current professional growth environment. On the one hand, the satisfaction degree of professional development is used to measure the degree of university teachers' professional growth, on the other hand, it can also be used to measure the psychological intention of a university teacher on professional growth. The degree of satisfaction of professional organizations is more aimed at the organizational platform and institutional environment created by universities for the professional growth of university teachers, if the school provides various organizations to protect and promote the professional growth of university teachers. And it creates a good institutional environment for the professional growth of university teachers, so the overall satisfaction degree of the professional growth of university teachers will naturally be higher. In a word, the investigation and analysis of the degree of satisfaction with the professional growth of university teachers in colleges and universities in Gansu Province can firstly clarify the orientation of the professional role and professional status of university teachers in colleges and universities of Gansu Province. Secondly, through the understanding of their own knowledge and skills, it is helpful to promote the formation of new professional knowledge and professional skills of university teachers in colleges and universities in Gansu province. Thirdly, the revelation of the present situation is also conducive to promoting the formation of professional organizations of university teachers in colleges and universities in Gansu Province, consolidating and perfecting their professional spirit and increasing the opportunities for their professional development.
【学位授予单位】:西北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G645.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 熊华军;丁艳;;当前美国大学教师专业发展面临的困境[J];比较教育研究;2011年03期
2 陈仕华;;我国高校教师专业化发展的策略——来自制度、高校和教师个人三个层面的分析[J];当代经济;2011年10期
3 申涤尘;徐玲;;高校教师专业化问题研究与实践[J];高等农业教育;2011年04期
4 熊华军;丁艳;;当前美国大学教师的学术角色[J];比较教育研究;2012年02期
5 熊华军;大学虚拟跨学科组织的原则、特征和优势——以麻省理工学院CSBi运行机制为例[J];高等教育研究;2005年08期
6 王春艳;杨移贻;;美国大学教师专业化归因及对我国的启示[J];高等教育研究;2009年02期
7 孟宪乐;高校教师专业化:问题、目标与策略[J];黑龙江高教研究;2005年08期
8 杨小峻;;专业精神:高校教师专业化发展的基点[J];黑龙江高教研究;2007年08期
9 吴海燕;;基于教学学术的大学教师专业发展研究[J];黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估);2009年Z2期
10 梁伦邦;;论高校教师的专业精神及其培育[J];经济与社会发展;2010年08期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张英丽;论学术职业与博士生教育的关系[D];华中科技大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 岑国斌;城市体育公共服务满意度及其改进研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
2 张杨;基于结构方程模型的初中生学校满意度测评研究[D];天津师范大学;2009年
3 付玉美;美国大学教师学术专业发展(1945-1970)[D];华东师范大学;2009年
4 王春梅;美国大学教师学术专业发展(1970-1985)[D];华东师范大学;2009年
5 徐成东;基于结构方程模型的高校教师科研绩效压力与科研诚信影响机制研究[D];浙江大学;2010年
,本文编号:2266216
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2266216.html