高等学校专业评估制度的国际比较研究——以法国、英国、美国和日本为例

发布时间：2019-01-04 20:26

【摘要】：在专业评估主体上,法国和英国是政府主导型,以政府主导的机构为评估主体;美国是社会主导型,以社会上的教育中介组织为评估主体;日本是多元主体型,以政府主导的机构和教育中介组织共同担任评估主体。政府主导的评估机构所制定的专业评估标准更加宏观,其专业评估活动是强制性的,并要向社会公布评估报告;教育中介性评估机构制定的标准更加具体,其评估活动是自愿参加的,通常只向社会公布评估结果。虽然有上述差别,但各国的专业评估都尊重教育的内在价值,在评估主体、评估标准和运行机制上也表现出了一些共同特征。
[Abstract]:In the subject of professional evaluation, France and Britain are government-led, with the government-led organization as the evaluation subject, the United States is the society-oriented, and the educational intermediary organization in society is the main body of evaluation. Japan is a pluralistic subject, with government-led institutions and educational intermediary organizations as the evaluation subject. The professional evaluation criteria developed by the government-led evaluation agencies are more macroscopic and their professional evaluation activities are mandatory and the evaluation reports should be published to the public. The criteria set by educational intermediary evaluation agencies are more specific, and their evaluation activities are voluntary, and the results are usually published only to the public. In spite of the above differences, the professional evaluation of all countries respects the intrinsic value of education, and shows some common characteristics in the subject of evaluation, the evaluation standard and the operating mechanism.
【作者单位】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学比较教育研究中心、北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学比较教育研究中心2008年度重大项目“高等教育质量保证体系的国际比较研究”(项目批准号08JJD880235)的成果之一 “北京师范大学优秀博士学位论文基金资助项目”的研究成果之一
【分类号】：G647

【参考文献】