当代大学生道德自我构建研究
[Abstract]:The moral education mainly refers to the individual, the individual, the individual and the group, the society, the individual and the natural behavior of conduct education[1]. Moral education is of great significance to the moral education in colleges and universities, and is an important part of the work of moral education in our country. First, from the individual point of view, the construction of the morality is the requirement of the self-complete development of the contemporary college students, which can promote the harmonious relationship between the college students and others and the society, and can also help the contemporary college students to study and live, Second, the moral construction of the college students will contribute to the development of the whole society's moral construction and promote the harmonious and stable development of the society. From the Present Situation of the Contemporary College Students' Morality, the Problem of the Contemporary College Students' Moral Confusion This is related to the contemporary social change and the poor effect of the moral education in colleges and universities. The most prominent problem in the traditional moral education is the question of the lack of human nature. The educator regards the student as an object of being modified, teaches moral values and moral rules to the students in the form of a moral indoctrination. In such a mode of moral education, the students' subjectivity is suppressed, and the subjective initiative of the students can not be played, which is not in accordance with the essence of moral education. The moral education is an educational practice activity aimed at the overall development of human beings. It is faced with a large number of students. The essence is to promote the full play of the students' potential, the promotion of the value and the completion of the human nature. Good. This is inseparable from the student's own active initiative. In the new century, our party has put forward the "people-oriented" scientific development view, which is the new direction of the moral education work in our country, and opens up a new idea of moral education in colleges and universities, and also puts forward a new way to the moral education in colleges and universities. On the basis of the present moral status of contemporary college students and the need of the development of contemporary college students, this paper puts forward the moral education model, which is to play the subjective initiative of the contemporary college students, guide the self-construction of the college students, and realize the self-harmony and promote the harmonious society. The mode of moral education is based on the students' autonomy and consciousness. In this paper, by means of interdisciplinary research, comparison, investigation and theoretical contact practice, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the moral status of contemporary college students in China and their influence on their moral status. On the base of the comparison of the current traditional moral education concept with the thought of the contemporary college students' moral self-construction, through the in-depth demonstration of the multi-subject theory, the theory with practice, and finally the conclusion that the moral self-construction of the contemporary college students in our country is in accordance with the moral cognition The rule of law is the scientific virtue in accordance with the law of moral education. The main point of view of this paper is the following points: First, in the traditional moral education mode, the moral situation of contemporary college students is inexhaustible. In the traditional moral education, the educator and the educated are the "subject-object" mode and the students lack In order to improve the moral level of college students, it is necessary to overcome the disadvantages of the subjectivity of the educatees in the course of the traditional moral education and to form the model of the "subject-object-subject" of moral education. Second, the moral construction process of the college students is through the social practice activities and the interaction activities. It's built. If it's just a one-way out-of-one, it's not an internal cause, and the effect is not. Ideal. The educator can only play a guiding role in the course of moral education, and can promote the moral formation of the college students through the full play of the self-subjectivity of the students. Without the guidance of the value of the educator, it can not be called the moral education process, but the self-cultivation and self-education are not the self-building of the educated, and the educational guidance of the educator is difficult to play. On the basis of the characteristics of the contemporary college students, this paper mainly discusses how the contemporary college students play an independent role in the moral construction and the principles that should be followed in the realistic social environment. At the same time, the moral education workers in colleges and universities should train the students' self-consciousness and creative spirit, and help the students to build their own way The full text is from the introduction, the text, the conclusion The paper, with the introduction of the introduction, mainly introduces the topic value and the topic meaning, the research goal and the present situation, the main content and the research. The text part of the article, first, expounds the moral self-structure of the contemporary college students from three aspects: the present situation of the college students' morality, the social demand and the development of the college students themselves. The necessity of building, and secondly, the construction of the self-morality of the college students. The main influencing factors are from the social change, the existing problems of the moral education in colleges and universities, and the three aspects of the college students' own problems. A detailed analysis of the moral self-construction of contemporary college students. It is discussed mainly from the theory of "people-oriented", the principle of dialectical relation, the principle of dialectical relation, the theory of self-education and the theory of self-education. In the end, the principle, the goal and the party of the contemporary college students' moral self-building are discussed. The study mainly focuses on the four objectives: the ability to form the self-moral choice, the ability to develop the self-moral constraint, the habit of forming the self-moral participation, the spirit of self-moral transcendence, the five principles: the principle of subjectivity, the principle of individuation, the principle of consistency, The principle of democratization and the principle of activity; three approaches: self-study, practice and exercise, and hard work. The conclusion is the core idea of this paper, and the deficiency in the course of the study, and the next step is pointed out.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G641
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高国抗;把握当代大学生新特点 做好思想政治工作[J];高教探索;1986年01期
2 邢铁华;;论当代大学生[J];阜阳师范学院学报(社科版);1986年01期
3 叶衍传;;当代大学生思想特点及管理教育方法再探[J];惠州学院学报;1986年01期
4 杨文极;照亮人生之路的明灯——科学世界观[J];高校理论战线;1988年05期
5 姚铁宜;当代大学生思想特点及其发展规律[J];现代大学教育;1988年01期
6 邢成勋;;当代大学生应具备什么样的品德和素质——认清历史责任做个合格的大学生[J];昆明师范高等专科学校学报;1988年02期
7 赵允吉;;试析大学生的逆反心理[J];山东社会科学;1989年05期
8 陈金千;;浅论大学生消费[J];江苏高教;1990年04期
9 谢明敦;;当代大学生偏激行为的归因分析及其预防[J];青年研究;1991年02期
10 黄义武;;对当代大学生“自我实现”的思考[J];学校党建与思想教育;1991年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 曹俊霞;巩绪福;;试论当代大学生的政治逆反心理[A];山东省医学伦理学学会第三届学术年会论文集[C];2002年
2 司树鹏;;当代大学生马克思主义信仰的缺失与重构[A];马克思主义与中国问题研究——重庆市研究生马克思主义论坛论文集[C];2010年
3 徐建平;;析我国当代大学生的思想特点[A];广西高等教育改革与发展——《广西高教研究》创刊十周年(1985-1995)论文选集[C];1996年
4 井世洁;郭鑫;;当代大学生职业决策困难特点及其影响因素研究[A];中国社会心理学会2006年学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
5 王顺辉;邹洁;刘彦红;;当代大学生人文素质教育现状与对策[A];“高教强省”探索与实践——高教科研2008[C];2009年
6 曹飞;;当代大学生理想、信念、价值观的调查与思考[A];理想·信念·信仰与价值观——全国理想信念与价值观学术讨论会论文集[C];2000年
7 赵红勋;;浅谈当代大学生的道德意识[A];公民意识研究[C];2008年
8 颜隆忠;;当代大学生职业生涯规划辅导影响的SWOT分析——基于某高校的调查[A];福建省高校思想政治教育研究会2009年年会优秀论文专辑(一)[C];2010年
9 范云平;;健全心理素质——当代大学生的课题[A];论中国式的社会主义现代化[C];2002年
10 戴新民;李顺来;何楣;谢海波;;当代大学生的性观念悖于传统[A];中南六省性学会第一次学术年会暨湖北省性学会第二届第一次学术年会论文集[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 袁君;关注当代大学生思想政治教育[N];组织人事报;2005年
2 董洪亮;当代大学生思想积极健康向上[N];人民日报;2004年
3 王晖;做人才文才口才皆备的大学生[N];河南日报;2007年
4 记者 李云萍;大学生,你在校园还好吗[N];石家庄日报;2006年
5 本报记者 李雪林;大学生:学业越来越轻松[N];文汇报;2007年
6 记者 赵新颜;为加快中原崛起贡献青春和力量[N];新乡日报;2007年
7 云师大冬阳爱心社 黄敏;为环保事业贡献当代大学生的力量[N];云南日报;2006年
8 中央财经大学 哈战荣;加强孝道教育 实现代际和谐[N];中国教育报;2008年
9 向杰;志愿服务西部是当代大学生正确选择[N];科技日报;2004年
10 闫世东、张国柱;网络文化与当代大学生[N];中国电脑教育报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 李纪岩;当代大学生社会主义核心价值观培育研究[D];山东师范大学;2010年
2 张奇峰;以“道德自我”概念为核心的杜威道德哲学研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
3 岳鹏;当代大学生社会主义观研究[D];电子科技大学;2011年
4 邱钰斌;我国当代大学生政治信仰培育研究[D];西南交通大学;2011年
5 董海浪;当代大学生社会主义意识形态教育研究[D];西南大学;2011年
6 蒙丹;当代大学生理想观研究[D];电子科技大学;2011年
7 王怡心;从道德自我到心灵境界——唐君毅形上学研究[D];北京大学;2004年
8 刘江宁;当代中国大学生信仰问题研究[D];山东大学;2012年
9 戴岳;找回失去的“道德自我”[D];西南大学;2009年
10 俞海洛;当代中国大学生思想史研究(1949-1988)[D];浙江大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 乔秀敏;我国当代大学生信仰状况研究[D];燕山大学;2010年
2 徐晓宁;当代大学生政治能力培养研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
3 黄巧蓉;论当代大学生现代法律意识的培植[D];华中师范大学;2004年
4 徐冬娜;当代大学生政治参与问题的思考[D];内蒙古大学;2010年
5 孙超;当代大学生孝文化教育缺失原因及其对策探究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
6 陈莉;当代大学生感恩教育的文化动力研究[D];湖南大学;2010年
7 齐亚红;当代大学生消费道德观透析[D];首都师范大学;2005年
8 尹红霞;人的现代化视阈下当代大学生道德责任教育研究[D];西北大学;2011年
9 张静;新自由主义思潮对当代大学生的影响及其对策研究[D];成都理工大学;2010年
10 李启华;解析社会主义核心价值体系与当代大学生价值观的建构[D];云南大学;2010年
本文编号:2507814
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2507814.html