终身学习立交桥建构的国际发展和比较分析

发布时间：2018-01-02 03:11

本文关键词：终身学习立交桥建构的国际发展和比较分析　出处：《中国远程教育》2013年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：世界各国都致力于发展各级各类教育衔接和沟通的终身学习体系,国际上称为资历框架,我国称为终身学习立交桥。本文采用文献分析和比较研究的方法,描述资历框架的国际发展并进行比较分析,主要分为五个部分:第一部分描述终身学习立交桥和资历框架的含义;第二部分分析国际上资历框架的发展现状,包括全球大约150个国家和地区已经建立和正在建立的资历框架,以及跨国和跨地区资历框架的发展;第三部分选择七个国家和地区作为样本,比较建立资历框架中的关键要素,包括资历框架的立法和管理的比较、资历级别和能力标准的比较、资历质量保证和评审机制的比较、成效为本、学分累积和转换、以及过往资历认可的比较;第四部分是讨论,作者提出资历框架发展的三阶段说,资历框架建设的国际化视野、多方合作、质量保证和其他关键因素;最后一个部分是本文的结论。作者希望,世界各国建立资历框架的经验和教训,能够对我国终身学习立交桥的建构具有一定的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:In the second part , the author puts forward three stages of the development of the Chinese calendar framework , including the comparison of the legislation and management of the Chinese calendar frame , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the

【作者单位】：香港大学专业进修学院持续教育及终身学习研究中心;
【分类号】：G720
【正文快照】： 一、终身学习立交桥和资历框架的含义构建各级各类教育衔接和沟通的终身学习体系,是当前全球教育发展的重心和趋势,许多国家都在努力发展一个地区、一个国家甚至跨国互认的终身学习立交桥体系。我国政府也在《国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)》中明确提出构建

【相似文献】