论自主选择与教育机会平等——与劳凯声教授商榷

发布时间：2018-07-31 06:30

【摘要】：劳凯声教授通过考察近几十年来中国教育机会平等问题的历史和现状,在充分尊重学生差异的基础上表达了一种"可选择的教育机会平等观"。其吸引力在于其植根于教育学立场,提出了一种教育学看待"教育机会平等"问题的独特视角;然而其局限同样明显,它认真对待了学生差异这一问题,却没有说明应该如何为自然禀赋和社会禀赋存在差异的学生合理分配作为稀缺资源的教育机会。基于此,笔者给出三方面的回应,它们分别涉及基于对"教育机会平等观"不同阐释的理论辩护和直觉主义辩护,以及在实践中不同教育机会平等观的制度依赖问题。笔者认为,"可选择的教育机会平等观"并不能为解决当下中国教育实践中的机会平等难题提供适切见解。因为,对"机会平等"等价值概念的辩护若要取得成功就需要一种合理的道德论证。
[Abstract]:By examining the history and present situation of the equality of educational opportunities in China in recent decades, Professor Lo Kaisheng expressed an "alternative view of equal opportunity in education" on the basis of fully respecting the differences among students. Its appeal is that it is rooted in the pedagogy standpoint, and puts forward a unique perspective of pedagogy on the issue of "equal opportunities in education". However, its limitations are also obvious, and it takes the issue of student differences seriously. However, it does not explain how students with different natural and social endowments should be reasonably allocated as educational opportunities of scarce resources. Based on this, the author gives three responses, which are related to the theoretical defense and intuitionistic defense based on different interpretations of the "equal opportunity in education" and the institutional dependence of the different views on equal educational opportunity in practice. The author believes that the "alternative view of equal opportunity in education" does not provide an appropriate view to solve the problem of equality of opportunity in Chinese educational practice. For the defense of such values as equal opportunity requires a reasonable moral argument for success.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学教育学部;
【分类号】：G521

【参考文献】