海峡两岸大学生生命意义比较研究——以广州市与台中市为例
发布时间:2019-04-30 21:35
【摘要】:该研究以广州市与台中市大学生为被试,抽取500人为预测样本及800人为正式施测样本,通过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析编制生命意义量表,并通过t检验和潜在剖面分析考察两岸大学生生命意义现况的差异。结果表明:(1)编制的生命意义量表由存在意义、追寻意义、存在盈实、苦难接纳、死亡接纳以及求意义的意志等6个维度组成,具有良好的信度和效度。(2)两岸大学生生命意义总体无显著差异;存在盈实、苦难接受与死亡接纳维度有显著或非常显著的差异。(3)潜在剖面分析结果显示,两岸大学生生命意义类型相似。Wald检验结果表明,对于"死亡接纳"维度,台湾与大陆学生在各潜在类别的均分上存在显著的差异。
[Abstract]:In this study, college students in Guangzhou and Taichung were taken as subjects, 500 were taken as predictive samples and 800 as formal test samples. Through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, a scale of life significance was compiled. T-test and potential profile analysis were used to investigate the difference of life significance between the two sides of China and Taiwan. The results show that: (1) the life meaning scale is composed of six dimensions: meaning of existence, meaning of pursuit, existence of reality, acceptance of suffering, acceptance of death and will to seek meaning. It has good reliability and validity. (2) there is no significant difference in life meaning between the two sides of China; There are significant or very significant differences between suffering acceptance and death acceptance dimension. (3) potential profile analysis shows that cross-strait college students have similar types of life meaning. Wald test results show that for the "death acceptance" dimension, There are significant differences between Taiwan and mainland students in the average scores of each potential category.
【作者单位】: 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院;国立台中科技大学通识中心;
【基金】:全国教育科学“十二五”规划教育部重点课题(GFA111009) 广州市基础教育学业质量监测系统项目(GZIT2012-ZB0292) 国家基础科学人才培养基金(J1030729)
【分类号】:B844.2
[Abstract]:In this study, college students in Guangzhou and Taichung were taken as subjects, 500 were taken as predictive samples and 800 as formal test samples. Through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, a scale of life significance was compiled. T-test and potential profile analysis were used to investigate the difference of life significance between the two sides of China and Taiwan. The results show that: (1) the life meaning scale is composed of six dimensions: meaning of existence, meaning of pursuit, existence of reality, acceptance of suffering, acceptance of death and will to seek meaning. It has good reliability and validity. (2) there is no significant difference in life meaning between the two sides of China; There are significant or very significant differences between suffering acceptance and death acceptance dimension. (3) potential profile analysis shows that cross-strait college students have similar types of life meaning. Wald test results show that for the "death acceptance" dimension, There are significant differences between Taiwan and mainland students in the average scores of each potential category.
【作者单位】: 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院;国立台中科技大学通识中心;
【基金】:全国教育科学“十二五”规划教育部重点课题(GFA111009) 广州市基础教育学业质量监测系统项目(GZIT2012-ZB0292) 国家基础科学人才培养基金(J1030729)
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 程明明;樊富珉;;生命意义心理学理论取向与测量[J];心理发展与教育;2010年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 王蕊;贾林祥;;构建生命的意义——由狄尔泰的生命哲学得到的启示[J];社会心理科学;2012年Z1期
2 石春;;意义治疗理论下的生命意义及其发展[J];徐州师范大学学报(教育科学版);2010年04期
3 程明明;樊富珉;彭凯平;;生命意义源的结构与测量[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2011年05期
4 王鑫强;张大均;薛中华;齐晓栋;;免费师范生职业认同感与生命意义的关系[J];心理学探新;2012年03期
5 郑勤;;生命意义文献综述[J];鸡西大学学报;2012年11期
6 张春雨;韦嘉;张进辅;李U,
本文编号:2469029
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/wangluojiaoyulunwen/2469029.html