小学作文书面评语优化研究

发布时间：2018-03-23 03:16

本文选题：作文评语　切入点：学生自评　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本研究通过文献研究法、案例分析法和访谈法,对当今小学作文书面评语做了较为深入的研究。首先分析了作文书面评语的认知功能、情感功能和审美功能。接着,揭示了当今评语缺失化、模式化和失范化等三大问题,细究原因是教师独揽精批、评语写作思路不够清晰,这些现象对作文教与学造成了较大的影响。针对以上情况,本研究提出作文评语的实施措施:首先是主体多元化,包括学生自评、小组互评和家长参评,并提出学生自评的具体方法;其次是内容多维化,包括认知、情感和方法,就认知维度而言,作文评语分为“基础要求”“重点要求”和“发展要求”三个层次;第三是形式多样化,横向可以展示同题作文的评语;纵向建立作文评语档案袋;还可以利用互联网的网络式评价,更好地拓展评语空间。
[Abstract]:Through literature research, case analysis and interview, this study makes a more in-depth study on the written evaluation of primary school composition. Firstly, it analyzes the cognitive, emotional and aesthetic functions of the written evaluation. This paper reveals the three major problems of missing comment, stylization and irregularity, which are caused by teachers' exclusive criticism and lack of clarity of thinking in writing. These phenomena have a great impact on composition teaching and learning. This study puts forward the implementation measures of composition evaluation: firstly, the main body is diversified, including student self-assessment, group evaluation and parent evaluation, and the specific methods of student self-evaluation are put forward. Secondly, the multi-dimensional content, including cognition, emotion and methods, is put forward. In terms of cognitive dimension, composition reviews are divided into three levels: "basic requirements", "key requirements" and "development requirements"; Also can use the network type evaluation of the Internet, better expand the comment space.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G623.24

【参考文献】