坐姿矫正器对矫正小学生读写姿势的效果分析

发布时间：2018-04-30 22:03

本文选题：矫正装置 + 健康教育　；参考：《中国学校卫生》2015年06期

【摘要】：目的评价坐姿矫正器对改善小学生读写姿势的效果,为相关部门制定干预计划提供依据。方法采用分层整群随机抽样的方法,选取重庆市主城区2所小学的一~三年级学生作为调查对象,并随机分为重点干预组和普通干预组,干预前后分别采用近视相关因素调查问卷进行调查。结果干预前重点干预组读写时胸离桌沿得分为(2.68±0.75)分,读写时眼距书本距离得分(2.76±0.76)分,均小于普通干预组的(2.76±0.77,2.85±0.74)分,其中读写时眼距书本距离得分两组间差异有统计学意义(t=-2.070,P0.05);干预后重点干预组读写时胸离桌沿得分(2.87±0.76)和读写时眼距书本得分(2.97±0.78)均大于普通干预组的(2.81±0.78,2.89±0.79)分,差异均无统计学意义(P值均0.05)。干预前后比较,重点干预组和普通干预组读写姿势2个条目得分均上升,且重点干预组前后比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-3.818,-4.116,P值均0.05)。结论使用坐姿矫正器更有利于促进小学生养成良好的读写姿势。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the effect of sitting position corrector on improving primary school students' reading and writing posture, and to provide basis for relevant departments to formulate intervention plan. Methods A stratified cluster random sampling method was used to select the first to third grade students from 2 primary schools in the main urban area of Chongqing, and were randomly divided into two groups: the key intervention group and the general intervention group. The myopia related factors were investigated by questionnaire before and after intervention. Results before the intervention, the score of chest off table edge was 2.68 卤0.75, and the distance between eyes and books was 2.76 卤0.76, which was lower than that of common intervention group (2.76 卤0.772.85 卤0.74). There was significant difference between the two groups in the distance between eyes and books in reading and writing, the scores of chest and off table edge in the key intervention group during reading and writing were 2.87 卤0.76) and the score of distance between eyes and books during reading and writing were 2.81 卤0.782.89 卤0.79), which were significantly higher than those in the normal intervention group (2.81 卤0.782.89 卤0.79), and the scores of the two groups during reading and writing were 2.87 卤0.76) and 2.97 卤0.78, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.05). Before and after intervention, the scores of reading and writing postures in the key intervention group and the general intervention group were all increased, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (-3.818) -4.116 (P < 0.05). Conclusion sitting position corrector is more helpful to promote pupils to develop good reading and writing posture.
【作者单位】：重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院妇幼与儿童少年卫生学教研室;重庆市卫生和计划生育委员会;
【基金】：卫生行业科研专项基金资助项目(NO.201202010)
【分类号】：G627.8

【参考文献】