海峡两岸现行小学语文课程标准的比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 13:45

本文选题：海峡两岸 + 小学语文课程标准　；参考：《扬州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：母语发展是学生智力发展的重要标志,对学生的整个身心发展都具有不可估量的作用。而一衣带水的大陆地区和台湾地区同属华人世界,历史脉络、文化情境相近,在课程上同样强调九年一贯课程,但由于课程标准和课程纲要设计的不同,从而呈现出不同的课程内容。因此,大陆地区和台湾地区是最值得进行比较的二个教育实体,本文拟对大陆地区2011版义务教育语文课程标准和台湾地区2008年修订的国民中小学九年一贯国课程纲要语文学习领域(国语文)进行比较研究。从制定背景、基本框架结构、基本理念、课程目标、课程内容几个方面的内容进行介绍、对比分析。以此来了解大陆地区和台湾地区小学语文课程的特点和异同,并在此基础上总结我国语文课程改革的基本走向。课程标准的制定背景方面,两岸的现行小学语文课程文件都是随着长期的社会历史变迁发展演变而来的,它们的颁布和实施一方面适应了时代潮流,一边面是为了解决教育问题。两者之间既有共同的地方又各有特色。课程标准的框架方面,大陆地区和台湾地区的语文课程文件结构大致相同,但各有特色。台湾地区由课程标准改为课程纲要,大陆由教学大纲改为课程标准,均以开放、多元、具有弹性作为课程改革的原则。不同之处,则在于台湾地区有“分段能力指标与十大基本能力之关系”部分、大陆地区有“附录”部分。课程标准的基本理念方面,两岸都注重对学生语文素养的培养,大陆地区更注重语文实践。两岸都注重语文课程的工具性和人文性,但有差异。大陆地区特别注重思想性；台湾地区语文学习信息化、自学能力程度较高,值得借鉴课程标准的阶段目标与内容方面,目标立足点上台湾地区联系更加紧密,逻辑比较严密；语文能力领域划分不尽相同,大陆地区更加注重综合性学习；两岸地区阅读目标相似,大陆地区识字量大、口语交际注重实践,台湾地区关注写作技巧、注重书法。在上述几个方面的比较研究的基础上,得出两岸小学语文课程标准的优缺点,从中得到对我们语文课程标准有益的启示。启示我们应重视母语学科课程的特殊地位；更加重视学生个性的发展,注重社会实践。为今后终身学习奠定基础,学会求知、学会共处、学会做人、学会做事。
[Abstract]:The development of mother tongue is an important symbol of students' intellectual development, and plays an inestimable role in the development of students' whole body and mind. However, the mainland and Taiwan, both of which belong to the Chinese world, share a similar historical and cultural context. They also emphasize the nine-year consistent curriculum in the curriculum, but due to the differences between the curriculum standards and the curriculum outline design, As a result, different curriculum contents are presented. Therefore, the mainland and Taiwan are the two most worthy educational entities to be compared. This paper intends to make a comparative study on the field of Chinese learning (Chinese language) in the 2011 edition of compulsory education curriculum in mainland China and the nine-year consistent national curriculum outline of national primary and secondary schools revised in Taiwan in 2008. From the background, basic frame structure, basic concept, curriculum objectives, curriculum content several aspects of the introduction, comparative analysis. In order to understand the characteristics and similarities and differences of Chinese curriculum in primary schools in mainland China and Taiwan, and on this basis summarize the basic trend of Chinese curriculum reform in China. In terms of the setting background of curriculum standards, the current primary school Chinese curriculum documents on both sides of the strait have evolved along with the long-term social and historical changes. Their promulgation and implementation have, on the one hand, adapted to the trend of the times. One side is to solve the problem of education. There are both common points and characteristics between the two. In terms of the framework of curriculum standards, the structure of Chinese curriculum documents in mainland China and Taiwan is roughly the same, but each has its own characteristics. The principle of curriculum reform in Taiwan is from curriculum standard to curriculum outline, and in mainland China from syllabus to curriculum standard. The difference is that there is a section on the relationship between the segmented capability index and the ten basic abilities in Taiwan, and an appendix section in the mainland. In the basic concept of curriculum standards, both sides pay attention to the cultivation of students' Chinese literacy, and the mainland pays more attention to the practice of Chinese. Both sides of the strait pay attention to the instrumentality and humanism of the Chinese curriculum, but there are differences. The mainland pays special attention to the ideological content, Taiwan language learning information, self-learning ability is high, it is worth learning from the curriculum standards of the stage of the objectives and content, the goal foothold of the Taiwan region is more closely linked, the logic is relatively tight; The Chinese ability is divided into different fields, the mainland pays more attention to comprehensive learning, the reading goals are similar in the mainland, the mainland has a large amount of literacy, the oral communication pays attention to practice, and Taiwan pays attention to writing skills and calligraphy. On the basis of the comparative study of the above several aspects, this paper draws the advantages and disadvantages of the Chinese curriculum standards in primary schools of both sides of the strait, and gets some useful enlightenment to our Chinese curriculum standards. We should pay more attention to the development of students' personality and social practice. Lay a foundation for lifelong learning, learn to learn, learn to live together, learn to be a man, learn to do things.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G623.2

【相似文献】