中国与新西兰现行小学母语课程标准的比较研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, education has been placed in an important position of priority development. Education reform is an important strategic choice for countries to participate in the world competition. As the mother tongue education which inherits and carries forward the excellent culture of our nation, it plays an irreplaceable role in the process of the creation and development of human culture, and to a certain extent determines the success of this national education. It is undeniable that the standard of mother tongue curriculum, as the normative document of the development of mother tongue education in a certain historical period, guides the development of native language education and the inheritance of excellent culture. At the same time, mother-tongue curriculum is also an important basis for learning other courses. The reform of mother tongue education in China was embodied in the Chinese Curriculum Standards for Full-time compulsory Education (Experimental draft), published in 2001. On this basis, after a 10-year experiment on the reform of full-time compulsory education, a summary was adopted. In 2011, the Ministry of Education officially published the Chinese Curriculum Standard for compulsory Education (2011 Edition). The newly promulgated mother tongue curriculum standards will certainly promote the further strengthening of Chinese curriculum and teaching in primary schools in China. Under the background of globalization, the reform and development of our own can not bring about the winning situation. We need to sum up the experiences of other nationalities' mother tongue curriculum reform and combine their own characteristics in order to be in the forefront of education in the world. This paper will choose the current Chinese and New Zealand mother-tongue curriculum standards for comparative analysis, Its current mother tongue curriculum standard in China is the compulsory Education language Curriculum Standard (2011 Edition), while the current New Zealand Mother tongue Curriculum Standard was published in 2007 and implemented in New Zealand for grades 1-8 in 2009. The Standards of Reading and Writing. This paper introduces the background of curriculum standards of mother tongue in the two countries, compares the objectives and contents of the standards of reading and writing in primary schools between the two countries, and evaluates the recommendations. We find that New Zealand pays attention to reading and writing, and pays attention to students' thinking. The development of creativity and other abilities requires students to study in preparation for their future careers. By analyzing the common points and differences between the two countries, we can understand the deficiency of Chinese mother tongue curriculum standards and provide reference for the reform of Chinese mother tongue curriculum. This paper includes two parts: introduction and text. The introduction mainly introduces the background, significance, train of thought, literature review and research methods, and makes a systematic combing of the curriculum standards of mother tongue of the two countries. There are four chapters in the main body. The first chapter collates the background of the curriculum standard of the two countries, so that we have a certain understanding of the formulation of the curriculum standards of the two countries. The second chapter mainly compares the curriculum objectives and contents of the two countries' curriculum standards, and compares the specific curriculum objectives and contents of China and New Zealand from the two areas of reading goal and writing goal. The analysis shows the advantages of reading and writing in New Zealand. The third chapter compares the evaluation recommendations of the two countries' curriculum standards implementation recommendations, and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two countries in this respect. Finally, the author summarizes and points out that the comparison of curriculum standards can enlighten the reform of Chinese curriculum standards.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G623.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 雷实;国外母语课程标准的基本理念[J];语文建设;2001年10期
2 徐鹏;郑国民;;国外母语课程发展的动态及趋势[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2011年02期
3 张毅;;在母语课程的源流中重新审视课程目标的取向——兼与徐林祥、杨九俊二位先生商榷[J];课程.教材.教法;2014年01期
4 罗丽华;;美国加州八年级《母语课程标准》[J];语文教学与研究;2009年20期
5 彭光宇;;母语课程还是该叫“国文”[J];湖南教育(中);2010年04期
6 张毅;;呼唤母语课程的重新命名——关于我国母语课程命名的考证与思考[J];语文学习;2013年01期
7 康海燕;谢利民;;中美母语课程标准评价体系比较[J];教育科学研究;2009年08期
8 马铭;;我国与美国加州八年级母语课程标准之比较[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2014年01期
9 潘涌;;各国母语课程与教学的若干特点[J];教育科学研究;2006年09期
10 韩雪屏;;当代国外母语课程知识状况[J];全球教育展望;2007年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 商报记者 王东;江苏教育社学术精品工程启动[N];中国图书商报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 张婷婷;中加初中母语课程标准对比研究[D];四川师范大学;2015年
2 郭海萍;中澳两国小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2013年
3 陆梦f3;中美小学母语课程标准写作部分的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2014年
4 雷芳;汉语母语课程定名研究[D];湖南师范大学;2005年
5 杨益斌;中美母语课程标准小学写作部分的比较研究[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
6 殷琳;中英小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2013年
7 时文华;中国与新西兰现行小学母语课程标准的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
8 孙广超;中加小学母语课程标准比较研究[D];扬州大学;2013年
9 戴滢;中美现行小学母语课程标准的比较研究[D];扬州大学;2014年
,本文编号:2185195
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2185195.html