中学心理健康教育满意度评价问卷的初步编制

发布时间：2018-01-22 20:05

本文关键词： 心理健康教育满意度评价跨样本不变性心理测量学　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2011年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:编制中学心理健康教育满意度评价问卷(SMHESES)并检验其信效度。方法:以Lee等的满意度单因素模型为基础,通过访谈、专家讨论及条目分析形成10个条目的问卷。采用网络化问卷调查与传统纸笔问卷相结合的方式,方便选取湖北与福建两省19所中学907名中学生(其中网络调查471名),随机分为两部分,一部分(n=453)进行探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=454)进行验证性因素分析,使用多组结构方程模式考察问卷的收敛效度和跨样本效度,并检验与中国中学生心理健康量表(MMHI-60)的关联。结果:探索性因素分析提取了单一因子,累计贡献率为57.51%,项目负荷系数在0.62～0.83之间。验证性因素分析检验了结构的有效性(χ2=124.06,CFI=0.96,NFI=0.94,RFI=0.92,IFI=0.96,TLI=0.94,RM SEA=0.07)。问卷及所有测量题目具有测量系数恒等性(χ2=165.09,CFI=0.94,NFI=0.92,RFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.94,RM SEA=0.08),在不同样本(男女生、纸质与网络)中模型具有较好的不变性。问卷的Cronbachα系数为0.91,1个月后重测信度为0.84。问卷总分与MMHI-60总分的相关系数为-0.31,与MMHI-60各维度的相关系数在-0.19～-0.30之间(均P0.01)。结论:中学心理健康教育满意度评价问卷具有较好的信效度,纸笔测验与网络化测验具有等效性,但仍需要扩大样本进一步深入检验。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compile the satisfaction evaluation questionnaire of middle school mental health education (SMHESES) and test its reliability and validity. Methods: based on the single factor model of satisfaction of Lee et al. The expert discussion and item analysis form the questionnaire of 10 items. The network questionnaire and the traditional paper and pen questionnaire are combined. It is convenient to select 907 middle school students from 19 middle schools in Hubei and Fujian provinces (among them 471 middle school students in the network survey, randomly divided into two parts, one part of which is divided into two parts) for exploratory factor analysis. The other part is the confirmatory factor analysis, using multi-group structural equation model to investigate the validity of convergence and cross-sample of the questionnaire. Results: a single factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 57.51%. The load coefficient of the project was between 0.62 and 0.83. The validity of the structure was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (蠂 ~ 2 / 124.06 / CFI _ (0.96)). RFII 0.92 IFI 0.96 TLI 0.94RMS EAA 0.070.The questionnaire and all the measurement questions have the identity of measuring coefficient (蠂 2 / 165.09). CFI 0.94 NF-I 0.92 RFI 0.94 ~ 0.94 TLI 0.94RM SEAA 0.08, in different samples (male and female). The model has good invariance in paper and network. The Cronbach 伪 coefficient of the questionnaire is 0. 91. One month later, the test-retest reliability was 0.84.The correlation coefficient between the total score of the questionnaire and the total score of MMHI-60 was -0.31. The correlation coefficient with each dimension of MMHI-60 ranged from -0.19 to 0.30 (all P 0.01). Conclusion: the questionnaire of satisfaction evaluation of mental health education in middle school has good reliability and validity. The paper-pen test is equivalent to the network test, but it still needs to expand the sample to further test.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学心理学院人的发展与心理健康实验室;福州大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：教育部“十一五”规划重点课题(DBA070072)
【分类号】：B844.2
【正文快照】： 学生对心理健康教育的满意度是一种检验学生知觉到学校心理健康教育有效性与服务质量的方法。学生知觉到的服务是有益的、有促进机能提升(如在学校表现、与家庭成员关系,以及自尊提高等)应是评价心理健康服务质量的重要指标[1]。传统对心理健康服务满意度的结构研究上有两种不

【参考文献】