“双轨合一”模式下临床医学专业学位硕士研究生考核指标体系研究

发布时间：2018-02-16 18:41

本文关键词： 临床医学专业学位研究生考核指标体系　出处：《重庆医科大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：研究目的本研究通过文献研究与德尔菲专家咨询法建立一套基于“双轨合一”培养模式的临床医学专业学位硕士研究生考核指标体系,采用AHP层次分析法计算指标权重,将考核指标制成自评量表在临床医学专业学位研究生中进行小范围的实测以检验指标质量,旨在为临床医学研究生教育提供参考。研究方法本研究采用文献回顾、德尔菲专家咨询法(Delphi method)、层次分析法(AHP)、问卷调查法等。研究结果(1)初步构建临床医学专业学位研究生考核指标体系本研究通过两轮德尔菲专家咨询法,由来自上海、重庆、云南、厦门等教学医院的27名专家筛选修改,制定了一个以“出科考核”、“年度考核”、“毕业考核”为一级指标及这三个维度下的15个二级指标、43个三级指标。两轮专家咨询的专家积极系数均为100%,第一轮专家权威系数为0.9117,第二轮专家权威系数为0.8457,第二轮咨询结果中,专家对于各级指标的肯德尔和谐系数均较高,P0.1,专家意见一致性较高,指标可靠性与科学性有保障。(2)层次分析法计算出各级指标权重本研究采用层次分析法(AHP),通过一系列数学计算,最终得到评价指标体系的各级权重。其中,3项一级指标权重分别为:“出科考核(0.3325)”、“年度考核(0.1397)”、“毕业考核(0.5278)”,15项二级指标权重分别为:“轮转出勤(0.0459)”、“临床实践(0.1142)”、“出科考试(0.0321)”等,及43项三级指标权重。(3)指标质量检验将三级指标制成临床医学专业学位研究生自评表,利用方便抽样,在调研单位发放50份问卷,回收44份,问卷回收率为88%,结果表明,指标体系总体克朗巴哈系数为0.821、区分度较好0.4074,结构效度也较好。研究结论本研究通过德尔菲专家咨询法建立了临床医学专业学位研究生考核指标体系,以“出科考核”、“年度考核”、“毕业考核”三个一级指标,在此基础上建立15个二级指标,43个三级指标。咨询专家积极性、权威性高,经检验,指标体系信度效度及区分度较好,实用性强,符合临床医学专业学位研究生培养要求。
[Abstract]:Objective through literature research and Delphi expert consultation, a set of evaluation index system of clinical medical degree and master degree graduate students was established based on "two-track integration" training model, and the index weight was calculated by AHP analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In order to provide a reference for the education of postgraduates in clinical medicine, the examination index was made into self-rating scale to test the quality of the index in a small range of the graduate students of clinical medicine. The research methods were reviewed by literature review, the purpose of this study was to provide a reference for postgraduate education in clinical medicine. Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), questionnaire investigation and so on. The results of the study are as follows: 1) preliminary construction of the evaluation index system for graduate students of clinical medicine major. This study was conducted by two rounds of Delphi expert consultation method from Shanghai, Chongqing, Yunnan, etc. The 27 experts in Xiamen and other teaching hospitals have selected and revised the amendment. The author made a first class index, 15 second class index and 43 third level index. The positive coefficient of experts in both rounds of expert consultation is 100, and the first round of expert right is also the right of experts in the first round of experts' consultation, the positive coefficient of expert consultation is 100, the first round of expert evaluation is the first level index and the 15 secondary index and 43 third level index under these three dimensions. The Wei coefficient is 0.9117, and the second round expert authority coefficient is 0.8457.In the second round of consultation, The Kendall harmony coefficient of each index is higher than P0.1, and the expert opinion is consistent. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to calculate the weight of indexes at all levels. In this study, the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to calculate the weight of indexes by a series of mathematical calculations. Finally, the weight of each level of evaluation index system was obtained. The weights of three first-grade indexes were: "out of school examination (0.3325)", "annual examination (0.1397)", "graduation examination (0.5278)" and "rotational attendance (0.0459)", "clinical practice (0.1142)", "outpatient examination (0.0321)" and so on. And 43 items of index weight. (3) quality check. The third grade index is made into a self-assessment table for graduate students of clinical medicine major degree. By using convenient sampling, 50 questionnaires are distributed in the research units, 44 questionnaires are recovered, and the recovery rate is 88%. The results show that, The overall Klonbaha coefficient of the index system is 0.821, the differentiation degree is good 0.4074, and the structural validity is good. Conclusion the evaluation index system of graduate students in clinical medicine major was established by Delphi expert consultation method. On the basis of three first class indexes, such as "examination out of science", "annual examination" and "graduation examination", 15 secondary indexes and 43 third grade indexes were established. The experts were positive and authoritative, and the reliability, validity and differentiation of the index system were better. The practicability is strong, accords with the clinical medicine specialized degree graduate student training request.
【学位授予单位】：重庆医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：R-4;G643

【相似文献】