医学博士质量核心评价指标的分析研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 04:17

本文选题：医学研究生 + 博士质量　；参考：《中国医科大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 博士教育是当代国际上公认的正规高等教育的最高层次。博士生教育的质量和数量是衡量一个国家高等教育发达程度和文化科学发展水平及其潜力与前景的一个重要标志。自1978年我国恢复研究生教育制度以来,博士研究生教育一直受到社会各界的关注和重视。然而,近年来博士生规模的扩大、博士生构成的多样化、毕业博士就业去向的变化以及知识生产模式的变化和大学管理模式的变化等,这一系列因素把博士教育和博士质量推到了前台。通过文献查阅发现,现阶段社会各界对于博士质量现状评价褒贬不一,有的学者认为在我国博士研究生数量快速增长的同时,博士质量呈下降趋势；还有的学者认为现阶段博士质量状况跟过去相比几乎处于持平状态。面对这种现状我们发现,关于博士质量现状评价和博士培养制度改革的文献研究进行的相对较多,而关于博士质量评价标准的分析研究进行的却很少,且现在我国没有一个明确的博士质量评价标准。本研究就是在这样认识的基础之上,旨在通过对医学博士质量评价的核心指标进行分析研究,为客观地对医学博士质量现状进行评价提供参考。本研究对博士质量的相关文献进行研究发现,目前国内直接针对博士质量内涵的研究相对较少,大多是结合关于博士教育质量的相关讨论中进行。通过分析汇总现阶段对博士教育质量的相关研究,我们认为应该把博士教育质量分为三个层次,即博士教育的宏观质量、中观质量和微观质量,其中博士教育的微观质量即通常意义上的博士研究生质量,也是本研究的主要研究对象。本研究调查检索到8个关于博士质量评价的指标体系和研究生综合素质评价的指标体系进行对比分析,对现阶段我国博士研究生质量评价的现状进行了汇总,结果表明：现阶段半数以上的质量评价体系中把“基础及专业知识水平”、“外语水平”、“创新素质”、“思想品德及身心素质”、“科研结果”“组织协调能力”、“独立研究能力”七个方面作为评价研究生质量及素质的方面,只有少部分指标体系中把“逻辑思维能力”和“分析解决问题的能力”单独作为评价研究生质量的方面加入质量评价指标体系中。本研究进一步对我国医学博士质量评价的核心指标的确立进行了分析研究,从不同层面不同角度,结合学科特点和社会各方面对我国现阶段医学博士研究生教育的发展需要,最后将医学博士质量的核心指标归纳为六个方面,包括思考能力、学习能力、协调能力和执行能力四个方面以及对整体质量体现最强的创新能力和临床学科独有的专业技能。本研究最后提出了在理想核心指标下的医学院校内部质量控制措施建议以及实施过程中的难点。依据前述分析结果,本研究认为：博士质量评价是一个受经济社会发展水平、博士教育发展水平、评价主体观念认识、评价方法是否客观有效等因素影响的纷繁复杂的过程。要对我国医学博士质量现状进行评价,首先应该明确现阶段我国医学博士质量的评价标准。通过分析讨论,我们认为医学博士质量的核心评价指标首先应该包括现阶段我国最需要的也是最能体现博士质量的创新能力,其次应该包括“想、学、问、做”四个方面的科研能力,即思考能力、学习能力、协调能力和执行能力,以及临床学科博士研究生所特有的专业技能。
[Abstract]:Doctoral education is the highest level of formal higher education recognized internationally. The quality and quantity of doctoral education is an important symbol to measure the development level of higher education and the development level of cultural science and its potential and prospects in a country. Since the resumption of graduate education system in China in 1978, doctoral graduate education has always been However, in recent years, the scale of doctoral students, the diversity of doctoral students, the change in the direction of the graduates' employment, the changes in the mode of knowledge production and the changes in the mode of management of the University, this series of factors have pushed the doctoral education and the quality of the bloggers to the front desk. At the same time, some scholars believe that the quality of doctoral students is declining while the number of doctoral students in our country is increasing rapidly; and some scholars believe that the quality of doctors at the present stage is almost in the same state as that in the past. There are a lot of literature research on the status evaluation and the reform of the doctor training system, while the analysis and Research on the standard of doctor quality evaluation are very few, and there is no clear standard of doctor quality evaluation in our country. This study is based on this understanding and aims at the core of the quality evaluation of medical doctorate. Indicators are analyzed to provide reference for objectively evaluating the quality of doctorate.
The research on the doctoral quality in this study finds that there are relatively few studies on the quality of doctor's quality directly in China, most of which are combined with the related discussion on the quality of doctoral education. By analyzing and summarizing the relevant research on the quality of doctoral education at the present stage, we think that the quality of PhD education should be divided into three. At the same level, the macro quality, medium quality and micro quality of doctoral education, and the microcosmic quality of doctoral education, that is, the quality of doctoral graduate students in the general sense, is also the main object of this study.
In this study, 8 indexes system on the quality evaluation of doctorate and the index system of comprehensive quality evaluation of postgraduates are compared and analyzed. The present situation of the quality evaluation of doctoral graduates in China is summarized. The results show that more than half of the quality evaluation system at the present stage is "basic and professional knowledge level". "Foreign language level", "innovative quality", "moral character and physical and mental quality", "scientific research results", "organization and coordination ability", "independent research ability" as the evaluation of the quality and quality of the graduate students, only a few indicators of the "logical thinking ability" and "analysis of the ability to solve the problem" alone make the seven. In order to evaluate the quality of graduate students, the quality evaluation index system is added.
This study further analyzes the establishment of the core indicators for the quality evaluation of medical doctorate in China. From different angles and different angles, it combines the characteristics of the subject and the social aspects to the development needs of the doctor's postgraduate education at the present stage of our country. Finally, the core indexes of the quality of medical doctorate are summed up into six aspects, including thinking. Ability, learning ability, coordination ability and execution ability are four aspects, as well as the innovative ability of the overall quality and the unique professional skills of clinical disciplines.
At the end of this study, we put forward suggestions on internal quality control measures and difficulties in the implementation process.
According to the results of the previous analysis, this study believes that the quality evaluation of doctor is a complicated and complex process affected by the level of economic and social development, the development level of doctoral education, the understanding of the concept of the main body, and the objective and effective evaluation of the methods. According to the analysis and discussion, we think that the core evaluation index of the doctor's quality should include the innovative ability of the doctor at the present stage which is the most needed and the most capable of reflecting the doctor's quality. Secondly, it should include the four aspects of scientific research ability: thinking, learning, asking, and doing, that is, thinking ability, learning ability, and coordination. Competence and executive ability, as well as professional skills of PhD students in clinical disciplines.

【学位授予单位】：中国医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：G643.0

【参考文献】