国外一流大学本科生与研究生课程考核方法比较研究
发布时间：2018-09-19 11:33
【摘要】：课程考核作为教学活动的一部分,是人才培养的关键环节之一,对保障人才培养质量至关重要。以2015年QS大学排名前100名中的20所国外一流大学的636门课程作为研究样本,对国外大学本科生与研究生课程的考核方法和不同考核方式所占权重进行了比较研究。研究发现:国外一流大学本科生与研究生课程考核呈现考核方法多样、考核方式灵活、考核方法选择策略相似、主要考核方法的权重比较一致、理论与实践结合课的考核更倾向于使用实践操作方法、必修课考核更倾向于使用考试方法、不同学科的课程采用的考核方法存在差异等特点;同时,本科生与研究生课程在考试与报告两种考核方法的使用比例、考核方式的选择、基础课与专业课使用的考核方法、理论课同理论与实践结合课的考核方法、选修课与必修课的考核方法、不同学科类型课程使用的考核方法等方面存在显著差异。基于此,提出了发展和完善我国高校课程考核方法的对策建议:丰富高校的课程考核方法,广泛实施综合考核方式;根据不同教育层次要求合理选择考核方式方法;根据课程类型灵活选择考核方法,并科学合理地分配不同考核方法的权重。
[Abstract]:As a part of teaching activities, curriculum examination is one of the key links of talent training, which is very important to guarantee the quality of talent training. Taking 636 courses in 20 top universities of foreign countries among the top 100 universities of QS University in 2015 as the research sample, this paper makes a comparative study on the assessment methods and the weight of different assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign universities. It is found that the assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign first-class universities are various, the assessment methods are flexible, the selection strategies of the assessment methods are similar, and the weight of the main assessment methods is the same. The examination of the combination of theory and practice is more inclined to use the practical operation method, the required course examination is more inclined to use the examination method, and there are differences in the assessment methods used in different subjects, at the same time, The proportion of examination and report in undergraduate and graduate courses, the selection of assessment methods, the assessment methods used in basic and professional courses, the assessment methods of combining theory with practice, There are significant differences between the assessment methods of elective courses and compulsory courses, and the assessment methods used in different subject types. Based on this, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for developing and perfecting the assessment methods of Chinese higher education courses: enriching the assessment methods of the courses in colleges and universities, widely implementing the comprehensive assessment methods, reasonably selecting the assessment methods according to the requirements of different educational levels, and improving the curriculum assessment methods of colleges and universities. According to the course type, the examination method is chosen flexibly, and the weights of different assessment methods are assigned scientifically and reasonably.
【作者单位】： 西安交通大学高等教育研究所/中国西部高等教育评估中心;西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院;
【分类号】：G642.4;G643
本文编号：2250012
[Abstract]:As a part of teaching activities, curriculum examination is one of the key links of talent training, which is very important to guarantee the quality of talent training. Taking 636 courses in 20 top universities of foreign countries among the top 100 universities of QS University in 2015 as the research sample, this paper makes a comparative study on the assessment methods and the weight of different assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign universities. It is found that the assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign first-class universities are various, the assessment methods are flexible, the selection strategies of the assessment methods are similar, and the weight of the main assessment methods is the same. The examination of the combination of theory and practice is more inclined to use the practical operation method, the required course examination is more inclined to use the examination method, and there are differences in the assessment methods used in different subjects, at the same time, The proportion of examination and report in undergraduate and graduate courses, the selection of assessment methods, the assessment methods used in basic and professional courses, the assessment methods of combining theory with practice, There are significant differences between the assessment methods of elective courses and compulsory courses, and the assessment methods used in different subject types. Based on this, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for developing and perfecting the assessment methods of Chinese higher education courses: enriching the assessment methods of the courses in colleges and universities, widely implementing the comprehensive assessment methods, reasonably selecting the assessment methods according to the requirements of different educational levels, and improving the curriculum assessment methods of colleges and universities. According to the course type, the examination method is chosen flexibly, and the weights of different assessment methods are assigned scientifically and reasonably.
【作者单位】： 西安交通大学高等教育研究所/中国西部高等教育评估中心;西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院;
【分类号】：G642.4;G643
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谈炳发;崔世海;;普通高校专业课程考核方法改革的探索与实践[J];中国电力教育;2013年19期
2 陈棣沭;韩婧;;中美大学课程考核方法之比较分析[J];教育与现代化;2010年02期
3 徐晓娟;王凤花;许蓉艳;;工科专业课程考核方法改革的实践与分析[J];绍兴文理学院学报;2006年02期
4 刘洁婷;;红河学院文科理论课程考核方法研究[J];红河学院学报;2009年02期
5 席晓晶;杨双花;陈华军;;硅酸盐工业分析实验课程考核方法的改革[J];洛阳理工学院学报(自然科学版);2014年01期
6 李贵梅;刘洁婷;;红河学院课程考核方法的调查与分析[J];红河学院学报;2009年01期
7 李学伟;;高校服装工程专业课程考核方法的创新思考[J];职业时空;2012年04期
8 陈天琪;彭芳;王嫣;陈代勇;赵云华;纪刚;;关于我院《生理学实验》课程考核方法的改革及实践初探[J];贵阳中医学院学报;2014年02期
9 郝庆升;李锐;聂英;;管理信息系统课程考核方法的探讨[J];中国管理信息化;2010年12期
10 张梅;任波;宋芳芳;雷晓莉;;《中药制剂分析》课程考核方法改革[J];成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版);2013年02期
，本文编号：2250012
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/yjsjy/2250012.html
