山东半岛城市群创新能力时空差异与协同发展研究
发布时间:2017-12-26 18:13
本文关键词:山东半岛城市群创新能力时空差异与协同发展研究 出处:《鲁东大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:当前,我国经济正处于新常态背景下重要的转型时期,城市作为当代经济社会发展的重要载体,决定了我国的转型必须与城市发展方式的转变联系在一起。国内外发展经验表明,通过发展城市群可以更好地促进城市群内部城市自身的发展。而城市群发展方式必须由粗放型向集约型转变,加强城市群协同创新是新时期良性发展的具体表现。因此,针对城市群创新能力及协同发展展开研究,不仅具有重要的理论意义,而且对我国经济社会可持续发展更具有重要的实践价值。本研究以地理学、经济学、社会学和生态学等多门学科为基础,利用文献综述与实证研究相结合的方法、比较研究法、定性分析与定量分析相结合的方法和聚类分析法等方法,对山东半岛城市群内八座城市的城市创新发展情况和协同发展程度展开测度分析。在山东半岛城市群城市创新能力测度方面,本研究采用熵值法和沃尔夫森指数进行评价;同时在山东半岛城市群城市创新协同发展情况测度方面,本研究采用熵值法和协同发展度进行评价。通过对山东半岛城市群城市创新能力的现状和影响因素分析,构建山东半岛城市群城市创新能力评价指标体系,按照时空的总体分析路径,对本区2004年、2009年和2014年三年的山东半岛城市群城市创新能力和协同发展度进行时空差异的定量分析。根据分析结果表明:在山东半岛城市群城市创新能力时间分析方面,青岛市的城市创新发展水平始终最高,其次为济南、烟台,日照市居于末位;在山东半岛城市群城市创新能力空间分析方面,从2004年的以青岛、济南为双核的状态发展成为2014年的以青岛、济南、烟台和潍坊为核心的多核状态,其城市创新发展形成了以青岛、济南、烟台和潍坊为轴的一体两翼的发展态势;在差异方面,8个城市的城市创新能力的区域差异性在不断减小,而城市群的两级分化呈现先减小而后增加的趋势;在协同发展度方面:山东半岛城市群的城市综合发展与城市创新发展呈现越来越协同的发展状态。本研究最后结合分析的结果和现状,从山东半岛城市群整体和个体两个方面给出了城市群创新发展的提升路径和协同发展路径。具体内容如下:第一章首先介绍了本研究的背景情况,说明了在此背景下的研究意义,另外对国内外研究进展状况进行述评;第二章主要介绍了与文章相关的概念和理论情况;第三章本研究对山东半岛城市群地区的创新能力发展情况进行了简要说明;第四章本文确定了山东半岛城市群创新能力评价指标体系并选取了计算模型;第五章本研究就山东半岛城市群创新能力展开测度,同时就其时空差异进行了评价;第六章对山东半岛城市群创新能力协同发展分析,在这个过程中,本研究建立了评价指标和评价标准,并选取了适合的评价方法;第七章本研究就山东半岛城市群中存在的问题,提出了适当的方法和措施;在第八章,本研究简述了结论,并阐述了研究的不足和展望情况。
[Abstract]:At present, China's economy is in an important transformation period under the background of new normal. As an important carrier of contemporary economic and social development, cities decide that China's transformation must be linked to the transformation of urban development mode. The development experience at home and abroad shows that the development of urban agglomeration can be better promoted by the development of urban agglomeration. The development mode of urban agglomeration must be transformed from extensive to intensive, and strengthening the synergistic innovation of urban agglomeration is the concrete manifestation of the benign development of the new period. Therefore, research on the innovation capability and collaborative development of urban agglomeration is of great theoretical significance and practical value for China's economic and social sustainable development. This research is based on the discipline of geography, economics, sociology and ecology, comparative method, combined with literature review and empirical research using phase research method, method of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis and clustering analysis, measure analysis is done to the creative development of the city in the city group in Shandong peninsula city eight and the coordinated development degree. In terms of the measurement of urban innovation capability of Shandong peninsula urban agglomeration, entropy and Wolfson index were used to evaluate this area. Meanwhile, the entropy and collaborative development degree were used to evaluate the collaborative development of Shandong peninsula urban agglomeration. The current situation and influencing factors of innovation ability of city of Shandong peninsula city group analysis, construction of city group of Shandong peninsula city innovation ability evaluation index system, according to the overall analysis of temporal path, in this area in 2004, 2009 and 2014 three years of city group of Shandong peninsula city innovation ability and the development of collaborative quantitative analysis of the spatial and temporal differences. According to the results of the analysis show that: in the time of the innovation ability of the city of Shandong peninsula city group analysis, the level of city innovation development in Qingdao city is always the highest, followed by Ji'nan, Yantai, Rizhao City at the bottom; the innovation ability of the city space in Shandong peninsula city group analysis, from 2004 in Qingdao, Ji'nan in 2014 to become dual core status in Qingdao, Ji'nan, Yantai and Weifang as the core of the core state, the city has formed the development trend of innovation and development in Qingdao, Ji'nan, Yantai and Weifang as one of two axis; in the differences, regional differences of 8 city innovation ability in decreasing, while the two grade city group decrease first and then increase.; in the joint development of the state: the development of city group of Shandong peninsula city comprehensive development and city development becomes more and more collaborative innovation . Finally, combined with the results and status quo of the analysis, the path and path of collaborative development of urban agglomeration innovation and development are given from two aspects of Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration as a whole and individuals. The specific contents are as follows: the first chapter introduces the background of this study, explains the meaning of the study under this background, the research status of domestic and foreign literature review; the second chapter mainly introduces the concept and theory of the situation and the related; the third chapter on regional innovation ability of city group of Shandong peninsula on the development of the situation a brief description; the fourth chapter of this paper to determine the evaluation index system of Shandong peninsula city group innovation ability and select the calculation model; the fifth chapter is the research of the city group in Shandong Peninsula innovation ability measure, also evaluates the temporal and spatial differences; the sixth chapter is the analysis of the coordinated development of Shandong Peninsula City Group innovative ability in the process in this study, establishes the evaluation index and evaluation criteria, and select the appropriate evaluation methods; the seventh chapter of this research exists in city group of Shandong Peninsula issue, The appropriate methods and measures are put forward. In the eighth chapter, the research is summarized, and the shortage and Prospect of the research are expounded.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙博文;李雪松;张雨迪;;武汉城市圈多中心协同发展研究[J];区域经济评论;2016年06期
2 刘雷;喻忠磊;徐晓红;张华;;城市创新能力与城市化水平的耦合协调分析——以山东省为例[J];经济地理;2016年06期
3 王成新;崔学刚;王雪芹;;新型城镇化背景下中国“城市群病”现象探析[J];城市发展研究;2014年10期
4 谭俊涛;张平宇;李静;;2001-2010年黑龙江省城市创新能力格局与发展过程[J];地理科学进展;2014年04期
5 方创琳;马海涛;王振波;李广东;;中国创新型城市建设的综合评估与空间格局分异[J];地理学报;2014年04期
6 吕拉昌;谢媛媛;黄茹;;我国三大都市圈城市创新能级体系比较[J];人文地理;2013年03期
7 李世泰;赵亚萍;张U,
本文编号:1338299
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1338299.html