当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 经济发展论文 >

国民政府时期城市房租标准、纠纷和特点研究

发布时间:2018-04-28 10:39

  本文选题:国民政府时期 + 城市 ; 参考:《河南师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:《汉书·货殖列传》有云:“各安其居而乐其业”。良好而稳定的居住环境作为人类的立足之地、栖身之所,承载着遮风避雨、安养生息等一系列功能。而国民政府时期,战争频繁,政局动荡,灾祸不断,大量的人口涌入城市,由此引起城市住房紧张,房租暴涨,纠纷不断。为稳定社会秩序,政府不断调整房租法规,力图解决人们基本的住房需要,但复杂的时局和多变的社会矛盾,使政府的调整愈加频繁,从而造成了房租标准较为混乱的局面。纵观国民政府时期的房租纠纷,根据产生主体的不同,分为房客减租、欠租引起的纠纷和房东加租、索租及收取额外费用引起的纠纷。这些纠纷极大地影响了市民日常生活及社会的和谐安定,引起社会各界的高度关注,纷纷提出解决的办法。作为弱势一方的房客,主要采取集体商讨对策和诉诸各类团体组织等方式与房东进行博弈,并从道义的角度出发,将房东的不良行为置于不利地位,进而争取广大民众和官方对其的同情和支持;房东在面对房客欠租、减租行为时,主要通过诉诸法院、成立组织并向政府请愿等方式积极应对,并取得了一定的效果。无论房客还是房东,他们都把政府当作其诉求请愿的重要对象,希望政府出台调解纠纷的措施。于是,政府重点从成立专门机构和制定相关法律法规来调解纠纷,规范租赁市场。面对房租纠纷,无论个体还是团体,无论民间还是官方,均做出了许多努力,也取得了些许效果。但因房东与房客不同的经济立场,且处于特殊的社会环境下,故这些措施均未能从根本上解决房租纠纷,只是起到暂时性的调解作用罢了。在国民政府时期这一特定的历史背景下,城市房租具有其独特性。包括受政局影响房租价格波动剧烈、房租征实、按生活费指数计算、押租金额异常高和截租现象时有发生等。虽然这是国民政府时期特殊环境下的产物,但正是由于其复杂性和特殊性,才能够从房租这一方面了解国民政府时期经济、政治包括人民生活的独特视角,对于今天的城市住房保障建设也具有些许的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:There is a saying: "all people live in peace and enjoy their work." The good and stable living environment, as a foothold of human beings, bears a series of functions, such as shelter from wind and rain, rest and recuperation. During the period of the National Government, the war was frequent, the political situation was turbulent, the disaster was unceasing, the massive population poured into the city, thus caused the city housing to be tense, the rent soaring, the dispute incessantly. In order to stabilize the social order, the government constantly adjusts the rent laws and regulations, tries to solve people's basic housing needs, but the complicated situation and the changeable social contradiction, causes the government to adjust more frequently, thus has caused the rent standard to be more chaotic situation. According to the difference of the main body, the rent disputes in the period of the National Government can be divided into the disputes caused by the rent reduction of tenants, the disputes caused by the arrears of rent and the disputes caused by the increase of rent by the landlord, the demand for rent and the collection of extra charges. These disputes have greatly affected people's daily life and social harmony and stability. As one of the most vulnerable parties, the tenants mainly take the means of collective discussion and resort to various groups and organizations to play games with the landlord, and from a moral point of view, the landlord's bad behavior will be placed at a disadvantage. The landlord, in the face of rent arrears, rent reduction, mainly through the court, set up organizations and petition to the government and other ways to actively respond, and achieved certain results. Both tenants and landlords see the government as a key target of their petition, hoping for measures to settle the dispute. Therefore, the government focuses on the establishment of specialized agencies and the establishment of relevant laws and regulations to mediate disputes and regulate the rental market. In the face of rent disputes, both individuals and groups, civil and official, have made a lot of efforts and achieved some results. But because landlords and tenants have different economic positions and are in a special social environment, these measures have failed to fundamentally resolve the rent dispute, but only play a temporary role in mediation. Under the special historical background of the National Government, urban rent has its uniqueness. It includes the violent fluctuation of the rent price influenced by the political situation, the real rent collection, the extraordinarily high amount of the mortgage rent and the phenomenon of cutting off the rent, calculated according to the cost-of-living index, and so on. Although this was the product of a special environment during the period of the National Government, it was precisely because of its complexity and particularity that it was possible to understand the unique perspective of the economy and politics of the period of the National Government, including the life of the people, from the perspective of rent. For today's urban housing security construction also has some reference significance.
【学位授予单位】:河南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.29;K262.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 侯风云;;1927-1937年南京住房问题之考察[J];江苏社会科学;2010年02期

2 朱英;孔令彬;;近代上海房客团体的产生、发展及其组织特点[J];浙江学刊;2010年02期

3 刘凤凌;;论抗战时期人口迁移与重庆城市化进程[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期

4 孔令彬;张伟然;;“变态”下的上海房租——以二十世纪二三十年代为主的分析[J];时代经贸(中旬刊);2008年S9期

5 张群;;民国时期房租管制立法考略——从住宅权的角度[J];政法论坛;2008年02期

6 高纲博文;陈祖恩;;战时上海的“租界问题”[J];史林;2007年01期

7 李映涛;民国前期内地城市工人生活研究——以成都为例[J];中华文化论坛;2005年04期

8 冯筱才;近世中国商会的常态与变态:以1920年代的杭州总商会为例[J];浙江社会科学;2003年05期

9 张伟;近代不同城市工人家庭收入分析[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2000年04期

10 张剑;二三十年代上海主要产业职工工资级差与文化水平[J];史林;1997年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 李开周;;抗战时期昆明的房租[N];云南日报;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 贺威;汉口房屋租赁问题研究(1931-1938)[D];华中师范大学;2012年

2 邢向前;1927年-1937年南京住宅建设问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2012年

3 刘敏;20世纪三十年代上海地区战争难民问题研究[D];上海师范大学;2010年

4 耿崇桑;抗日战争时期上海房地产业研究[D];复旦大学;2009年

5 孔令彬;上海房客团体研究(1921-1937)[D];华中师范大学;2009年

6 匡丹丹;上海工人的收入与生活状况(1927-1937)[D];华中师范大学;2008年

7 张斌;1928-1937年南京城市居民生活透析[D];吉林大学;2004年



本文编号:1814918

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1814918.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e758f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com