生产性服务业与制造业的互动机理
本文选题:生产性服务业 切入点:制造业 出处:《浙江理工大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:生产性服务业作为一种重要的新兴产业,将是浙江经济的一个新增长点。生产性服务作为中间投入,为制造业提供相应的要素和服务。从产业互动的角度来看,生产性服务业的 外部化‖可以促进制造业企业不断降低生产成本,从而提高制造业的生产水平;而制造业通过不断吸纳生产性服务业提供的要素和服务而快速发展,,于是为生产性服务业提供了潜在的市场和发展空间。那么,对于生产性服务业迅速崛起、制造业竞争优势明显的浙江省,两者之间的互动程度究竟如何?这是一个值得探讨的问题。 社会分工揭示了生产性服务业与制造业发展的内在机制,它意味着生产性服务业与制造业在一定条件下通过要素投入的优化配置而相互促进。但纵观大量研究发现,从产业内部要素再分配入手研究两者互动的文献并不见多。基于此,本文从生产要素分解与重组的微观视角研究浙江省生产性服务业与制造业的互动关系。 首先,根据浙江省生产性服务业与制造业发展的特征,提出了两者互动的三个理论假说。其次,从微观角度研究生产性服务业与制造业的互动机理,具体以柯布-道格拉斯生产函数为蓝本,通过劳动和资本两种可变要素结构的分解与重构,建立共生状态下生产性服务业与制造业产出规模的联立方程模型,并讨论两者互动的前提条件及形式。然后,以浙江省生产性服务业和制造业的数据为样本,从制造业整体和分行业两个层面进行实证检验。 实证结果充分肯定了互动的三个假说,本文结论表现为以下四点:(1)浙江省生产性服务业与制造业整体的互动效应较强;(2)制造业产业结构的高级化有助于增强生产性服务业对制造业发展的正向效应,生产性服务业产业结构的升级也提高了制造业对生产性服务业发展的正向效应;(3)这种互动关系主要表现在生产性服务业与资本密集型或技术密集型制造业之间,与劳动密集型制造业的互动并不积极;(4)生产性服务业对较高端制造业的推动力强于较低端的制造业,而资本含量高的制造业对生产性服务业的拉动力强于资本含量低的制造业。
[Abstract]:Producer services, as an important emerging industry, will be a new growth point of Zhejiang economy. As an intermediate input, producer services will provide corresponding elements and services for manufacturing. The externalization of producer services can promote manufacturing enterprises to continuously reduce production costs and thus improve the level of manufacturing, while manufacturing develops rapidly by continuously absorbing the elements and services provided by producer services. Therefore, it provides potential market and development space for producer services. What is the degree of interaction between the producer services and Zhejiang Province, where the rapid rise of producer services and the obvious competitive advantage of manufacturing industry? This is a problem worth exploring. The social division of labor reveals the internal mechanism of the development of producer service industry and manufacturing industry, which means that producer service industry and manufacturing industry promote each other through the optimal allocation of factor input under certain conditions. There are few literatures to study the interaction between the two from the perspective of internal factor redistribution. Based on this, this paper studies the interaction between producer service industry and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province from the microcosmic perspective of factorization and reorganization of factors of production. Firstly, according to the characteristics of the development of producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province, three theoretical hypotheses of interaction between producer services and manufacturing industry are put forward. Secondly, the interaction mechanism between producer services and manufacturing industry is studied from a micro perspective. Taking the Cobb-Douglas production function as the blueprint, by decomposing and reconstructing the structure of two variable elements of labor and capital, the simultaneous equation model of the production scale of producer service industry and manufacturing industry in symbiotic state is established. Then, taking the data of producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province as a sample, the empirical test is carried out from the two levels of manufacturing industry as a whole and sub-industries. The empirical results fully confirm the three hypotheses of interaction. The conclusion of this paper is as follows: 1) the interaction between producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province is stronger. 2) the advanced industrial structure of manufacturing industry helps to enhance the positive effect of producer services on the development of manufacturing industry. The upgrading of the industrial structure of producer services also enhances the positive effect of manufacturing on the development of producer services. The interaction between producer services and capital-intensive or technology-intensive manufacturing industries is the main manifestation of the interaction between producer services and capital-intensive or technology-intensive manufacturing industries. The interaction with the labor-intensive manufacturing industry is not active. 4) the producer service industry is stronger than the lower end manufacturing industry in driving force, and the high capital content manufacturing industry is stronger than the low capital content manufacturing industry.
【学位授予单位】:浙江理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F424;F719
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邱灵;申玉铭;任旺兵;;北京生产性服务业与制造业的关联及空间分布[J];地理学报;2008年12期
2 陈立敏,谭力文;评价中国制造业国际竞争力的实证方法研究——兼与波特指标及产业分类法比较[J];中国工业经济;2004年05期
3 顾乃华;;生产性服务业对工业获利能力的影响和渠道——基于城市面板数据和SFA模型的实证研究[J];中国工业经济;2010年05期
4 陈建军;陈菁菁;;生产性服务业与制造业的协同定位研究——以浙江省69个城市和地区为例[J];中国工业经济;2011年06期
5 高觉民;李晓慧;;生产性服务业与制造业的互动机理:理论与实证[J];中国工业经济;2011年06期
6 张世贤;工业投资效率与产业结构变动的实证研究——兼与郭克莎博士商榷[J];管理世界;2000年05期
7 陈建军;陈国亮;黄洁;;新经济地理学视角下的生产性服务业集聚及其影响因素研究——来自中国222个城市的经验证据[J];管理世界;2009年04期
8 江静;刘志彪;于明超;;生产者服务业发展与制造业效率提升:基于地区和行业面板数据的经验分析[J];世界经济;2007年08期
9 冯泰文;;生产性服务业的发展对制造业效率的影响——以交易成本和制造成本为中介变量[J];数量经济技术经济研究;2009年03期
10 刘兵权;王耀中;;分工、现代生产性服务业与高端制造业发展[J];山西财经大学学报;2010年11期
本文编号:1608422
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1608422.html