北京市生产性服务业对制造业效率的影响研究
发布时间:2018-04-22 03:02
本文选题:生产性服务业 + 制造业效率 ; 参考:《北京交通大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着北京市制造业创新发展和"高精尖"进程的推进,提高制造业效率变得尤为紧迫。然而北京市制造业仍然面临着效率不高、低成本性制造业占比大等困境。同时,北京市生产性服务业拥有知识密集、资本密集等优势,对拉动经济增长做出重要贡献。紧随世界发达国家由"工业经济"向"服务经济"转型的大潮,北京市应该利用得天独厚的生产性服务业发展优势,提高生产性服务业对制造业效率的促进作用,实现北京市制造业的创新发展。本文在梳理相关文献和对北京市两大产业现状分析的基础上,通过灰色关联度分析来定量研究北京市生产性服务业及其细分行业对制造业效率的影响;进一步,提出了生产性服务业发展水平对制造业效率的调节机理,即生产性服务业发展水平可以分别调节技术创新、人力资本存量和地区经济发展水平对制造业效率的影响,并进行具体路径分析;最后,通过层级回归的实证分析,定量分析了生产性服务业及其细分行业发展水平对制造业效率影响的调节效应,即研究了北京市在技术创新水平、地区经济发展和人力资本存量与制造业效率关系中,生产性服务业及其细分行业发展水平是否发挥相应的调节效应。通过实证分析,得到如下结果:第一,北京市生产性服务业对制造业效率产生正向的关联关系:传统的生产性服务业与制造业效率之间关联关系较弱;而包括金融、信息、科技等生产性服务业与制造业效率关联较强,对制造业效率产生较强的促进作用。第二,北京市生产性服务业发展水平对制造业效率发挥了相应的调节效应:现代信息、科技、商务等生产性服务业普遍展现出较强的调节效应;传统生产性服务业调节效应不显著,或存在较弱的调节效应。第三,基于人力资本存量,生产性服务业发展水平发挥了最为显著的调节效应,北京市人力资本密集。第四,金融业作为北京市生产性服务业的主导产业,其发展水平对促进制造业效率的提升发挥的调节效应不强。本文在前人文献的基础上分析了具体的调节机理路径,从调节效应的微观层面研究生产性服务业对制造业效率的影响,弥补了目前内在影响机理分析匮乏的缺陷;同时从北京市制造业效率的视角进行区域产业研究,弥补了目前北京市制造业效率分析不足的现状,为提高北京市制造业效率提供了支撑。
[Abstract]:With the innovation and development of manufacturing industry in Beijing and the advancement of "high precision" process, it is particularly urgent to improve the efficiency of manufacturing industry. However, the manufacturing industry in Beijing is still faced with low efficiency and low-cost manufacturing industry. At the same time, Beijing producer services have the advantages of knowledge-intensive and capital-intensive, which make important contribution to economic growth. Following the tide of transition from "industrial economy" to "service economy" in developed countries in the world, Beijing should take advantage of its unique advantages in the development of producer services to enhance the contribution of producer services to manufacturing efficiency. To realize the innovation and development of Beijing manufacturing industry. On the basis of combing the relevant literature and analyzing the present situation of the two major industries in Beijing, this paper quantitatively studies the effect of Beijing producer service industry and its subdivision industries on manufacturing efficiency through grey correlation degree analysis. This paper puts forward the adjustment mechanism of producer service development level to manufacturing efficiency, that is, the development level of producer service industry can adjust the effects of technological innovation, human capital stock and regional economic development level on manufacturing efficiency respectively. Finally, through the empirical analysis of hierarchical regression, quantitative analysis of the impact of producer services and their subdivision on manufacturing efficiency, namely, the level of technological innovation in Beijing. In the relationship between the regional economic development and the stock of human capital and the manufacturing efficiency, whether the development level of producer service industry and its subdivision plays a corresponding regulatory effect. Through the empirical analysis, the following results are obtained: first, Beijing producer services have a positive correlation on manufacturing efficiency: the traditional producer services and manufacturing efficiency have a weak correlation, including finance, information, Producer services, such as science and technology, are closely related to manufacturing efficiency, and have a strong promoting effect on manufacturing efficiency. Second, the development level of Beijing producer service industry has played a corresponding regulatory effect on manufacturing efficiency: modern information, science and technology, commerce and other producer services generally show a strong regulatory effect; The adjustment effect of traditional producer service industry is not significant or weak. Thirdly, based on the stock of human capital, the development level of producer services plays the most significant regulatory effect. Fourth, as the leading industry of Beijing producer service industry, the development level of financial industry does not play a strong regulatory effect on the promotion of manufacturing efficiency. On the basis of previous literatures, this paper analyzes the specific path of regulation mechanism, studies the impact of producer services on manufacturing efficiency from the micro level of adjustment effect, and makes up for the deficiency of the analysis of internal influence mechanism at present. At the same time, the regional industry research is carried out from the perspective of manufacturing efficiency in Beijing, which makes up for the insufficient analysis of manufacturing efficiency in Beijing at present and provides the support for improving the efficiency of manufacturing industry in Beijing.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F719;F427
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 席强敏;李国平;;京津冀生产性服务业空间分工特征及溢出效应[J];地理学报;2015年12期
2 张琴;赵丙奇;郑旭;;科技服务业集聚与制造业升级:机理与实证检验[J];管理世界;2015年11期
3 徐顽强;孙正翠;周丽娟;;基于主成分分析法的科技服务业集聚化发展影响因子研究[J];科技进步与对策;2016年01期
4 张清正;李国平;;中国科技服务业集聚发展及影响因素研究[J];中国软科学;2015年07期
5 张浩然;;生产性服务业集聚与城市经济绩效——基于行业和地区异质性视角的分析[J];财经研究;2015年05期
6 陈启斐;王晶晶;岳中刚;;研发外包是否会抑制我国制造业自主创新能力?[J];数量经济技术经济研究;2015年02期
7 张亚军;干春晖;郑若谷;;生产性服务业与制造业的内生与关联效应——基于投入产出结构分解技术的实证研究[J];产业经济研究;2014年06期
8 吴福象;曹璐;;生产性服务业集聚机制与耦合悖论分析——来自长三角16个核心城市的经验证据[J];产业经济研究;2014年04期
9 刘婷婷;曾洪勇;张华;;京津生产性服务业与制造业互动关系比较研究[J];中国人口.资源与环境;2014年S2期
10 盛丰;;生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级:机制与经验——来自230个城市数据的空间计量分析[J];产业经济研究;2014年02期
,本文编号:1785291
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1785291.html