国家社会主义的劳动体制及其转型——基于对国家社会主义时期的苏联、东欧和中国劳动体制的比较

发布时间：2017-12-27 18:45

本文关键词：国家社会主义的劳动体制及其转型——基于对国家社会主义时期的苏联、东欧和中国劳动体制的比较　出处：《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从劳动过程理论视角看,社会主义国家的市场转型路径不仅由精英所主导,还与不同劳动体制下劳动者的态度与选择有关。将"政党—国家能力"和"技术官僚权力"两个因素补充进迈可·布洛维对国家社会主义劳动体制理想类型的建构框架中,认为国家社会主义劳动体制包括官僚专制主义、官僚霸权主义、群众参与主义和工人自治主义。当国家社会主义遭遇普遍性的效率与合法性困境时,奉行不同劳动体制的国家的转型路径也存在差异。劳动体制为官僚专制主义与官僚霸权主义的国家因存在严重的贫富分化与劳资矛盾造成民众仇视政党国家,并导致政权迅速更迭;劳动体制为群众参与主义的国家因工人阶级对政党—国家的信任并未丧失,为国家主导的渐进式改革争取了时间;而在劳动体制为工人自治主义的国家,因"政党—国家能力"与"技术官僚权力"都较弱,而走向了地区的自治与分裂。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of labor process theory, the path of market transformation in socialist countries is not only dominated by elites, but also related to the attitudes and choices of workers under different labor systems. The "party state ability" and "technocratic power" two factors added Michael Blovi to the national socialist labor system ideal type of frame construction, that the national socialist labor system including bureaucratic authoritarianism, bureaucratic hegemony, public participation and the doctrine and worker autonomy. When national socialism is confronted with the dilemma of universal efficiency and legitimacy, there are also differences in the path of transformation of countries pursuing different labor systems. The labor system for bureaucratic authoritarianism and bureaucratic hegemony countries due to the existence of polarization and labor conflicts caused serious public hostility to the party state, and lead to rapid change in regime; labor system doctrine for the masses of the country because of working class party state did not lose the trust, for a time for the gradual reform of state led; and in the labor system for workers autonomy state, because of the "party state ability" and "bureaucratic power" are weak, and to autonomy and split area.
【作者单位】：上海大学社会学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第56批面上资助项目(D.10-0137-14-B02)
【分类号】：F249.1
【正文快照】： 即便同样经历了国家社会主义阶段,苏联、中国、东欧却走向了不同的转型道路:苏联的市场化是自上而下进行的,东欧国家的市场化是由跨国公司发动的,中国则走上了自下而上的市场社会主义道路。不同国家市场转型模式的差异一直是比较社会主义的核心议题,本文将从劳动过程理论对这

【相似文献】