城市基层简约治理何以失效——以G市L区城市协管为例

发布时间：2018-04-07 17:22

本文选题：半正式行政人员　切入点：半正式治理　出处：《中共福建省委党校学报》2016年07期

【摘要】：在城市基层治理实践中,以城市协管员这类"半正式行政人员"为主体的"半正式治理"既有助于节约国家治理成本又提高了治理效率。但是,野蛮执法、暴力冲突、滥用职权、激化社会矛盾等的频繁上演,不断使这种"半正式治理"被污名化,很难再现作为传统基层治理经验的"简约治理"。文章基于G市L区城市协管的参与式观察和访谈发现,作为行政发包制的产物,城市基层治理中的"半正式治理"完全"物是人非",并非是官僚化在压缩"半正式治理"的运行空间而是完全改变了其运行轨迹,由于治理主体迥异于传统的"准官员"、治理实践高度行政化以及共识性规则的缺失最终使得当下的"半正式治理"形似而神离"简约治理"。
[Abstract]:In the practice of urban grass-roots governance, "semi-formal governance", which takes such "semi-formal administrative personnel" as the main body, is not only helpful to save the cost of national governance, but also improves the efficiency of governance.However, the frequent occurrence of barbaric law enforcement, violent conflict, abuse of power and intensification of social contradictions constantly stigmatizes this kind of "semi-formal governance", which makes it difficult to reproduce "simple governance" as the experience of traditional grass-roots governance.Based on the participatory observation and interview of the L district of G city, the article finds that as the product of the administrative contract system,The "semi-formal governance" in urban grass-roots governance is not bureaucratic in reducing the operation space of "semi-formal governance", but has completely changed its running trajectory.Because the main body of governance is different from the traditional "quasi-official", the practice of governance is highly administrative and the lack of consensus rules finally makes the present "semi-formal governance" similar to "simple governance".
【作者单位】：中山大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“扩展公民有序的政治参与”(项目编号:12ZD040) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“港澳与内地参与式治理比较研究”(项目编号:14JJD630002);教育部人文社会科学规划项目“维权抗争治理中的民主建设研究”(项目编号:12YJA810019);教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”“地方政府创新中的参与式治理研究”的研究成果
【分类号】：D630;F299.27

【相似文献】