高速公路BOT项目收费标准及调节基金研究

发布时间：2018-07-27 13:37

【摘要】：作为高速公路BOT项目谈判和高速公路BOT项目运营阶段的重要内容,费率问题涉及很多方面,在高速公路建设发展中,费率的合理确定显得非常重要。研究高速公路的费率确定机制,对政府和项目公司都具有一定的积极意义,一定程度上也能够促进高速公路BOT项目的顺利完成。BOT项目高速公路涉及到政府、项目公司和道路使用者这三方面的利益,政府和项目公司可以直接在合同的商定过程中保证已方利益,道路使用者不能直接参与谈判,只能通过是否选择该高速路来保证自己的利益。因此,本文从道路使用者的利益出发,以他们所追求的级差效益为原则进行定价,同时提出调节基金制度来保证项目公司追求的经济利益和政府追求的社会效益。BOT项目调节基金是通过设定项目年收入的上下限(当项目年收入没有达到下限值时,政府用调节基金的初始基金对项目公司进行补贴,当项目年收入超过上限值时,项目公司需将超过上限值的那部分收入注入调节基金)调节项目公司的收入,保障项目公司在整个运营期内能够获得合理的收益,同时保障调节基金的初始基金能够循环使用。本文可以大致分为5个部分,具体研究内容如下：首先,主要对论文的研究背景、研究意义、研究内容和研究方法进行阐述和说明,利用文献研究法对国内外的已有成果进行综述,提出本文的研究目的；其次,相关理论及概念界定。从高速公路是准公共物品、高速公路具有垄断性、高速公路具有外部性、高速公路是社会公益性基础设施这四个方面阐述高速公路的社会性和经济性以及对BOT模式、BOT模式产品定价等进行阐述。第三,从BOT项目高速路涉及到的政府、项目公司和道路使用者这三方面利益体进行分析,通过构建数学模型分别以项目公司追求的经济利益、政府追求的社会效益和道路使用者所追求的级差效益三个方面进行定价,并分析这三种定价方法的优缺点,最后结合政府和项目公司可以直接参与合同谈判来保证已方利益这一现实情况,从而将道路使用者所追求的级差效益作为定价原则,同时提出调节基金制度来保证政府追求的社会效益和项目公司追求的经济利益。第四,BOT项目高速公路的收入调节基金是通过设定项目年收入的上下限(当项目年收入没有达到下限值时,政府用调节基金的初始基金对项目公司进行补贴,当项目年收入超过上限值时,项目公司需将超过上限值的那部分收入注入调节基金)调节项目公司的收入,保障项目公司在整个运营期内能够获得合理的收益,同时保障调节基金的初始基金能够循环使用(同时保障社会效益)。通过构建数学模型确定出调节基金的上下限值和初始额度值,引用数据进行分析讨论。第五,结论部分。在总结全文的基础上,建议政府部门以道路使用者追求的级差效益为原则对BOT项目高速路进行定价,同时建立BOT项目调节基金制度来保障政府追求的社会效益和项目公司追求的经济利益,从而确定出合理有效的BOT项目高速公路定价方法。
[Abstract]:As the important content of the BOT project negotiation and the BOT project operation stage of the expressway, the rate problem involves many aspects. In the development and development of the expressway, the reasonable determination of the rate is very important. It is of certain positive significance to the government and the item company to study the rate determination mechanism of the expressway, to a certain extent. The BOT project can also promote the smooth completion of the highway BOT project. The.BOT project involves the interests of the government, the item company and the road users. The government and the item company can directly guarantee the interests of the parties in the negotiation process of the contract. The road users can not directly participate in the negotiation, only by choosing the highway or not. Therefore, this article, starting with the interests of the users of the road, pricing in the principle of differential benefit they pursue, and puts forward the regulation fund system to ensure the economic benefits pursued by the item company and the social benefits of the government,.BOT project regulation fund, by setting up the upper and lower limits of the annual income of the project. When the annual income does not reach the lower limit, the government subsidize the item company with the initial fund of the regulation fund. When the annual income of the project exceeds the upper limit, the item company needs to inject the income of the upper limit into the item company's income to ensure that the item company can receive a reasonable income during the whole period of operation. At the same time, the initial fund of the regulation fund can be recycled. This paper can be divided into 5 parts. The specific research contents are as follows: first, the research background, research significance, research content and research methods are expounded and explained, and the literature research method is used to review the existing achievements at home and abroad, and the article is put forward in this paper. Secondly, the relevant theories and concepts are defined. From the freeway is quasi public goods, the expressway has the monopoly, the expressway has the externality, the expressway is the social public welfare infrastructure. The four aspects of the expressway are sociality and economy, and the BOT model and BOT model product pricing are expounded. Third, from the analysis of the three interests of the government, item company and road users on the BOT highway, through the construction of mathematical models, the economic benefits pursued by item company, the social benefits pursued by the government and the difference efficiency pursued by road users in three aspects, and the analysis of these three kinds of pricing parties. The advantages and disadvantages of the law, in the end, combined with the government and item company can directly participate in the contract negotiations to ensure the reality of the interests of the party, thus the differential benefit pursued by the road users as the pricing principle, and the regulation fund system is put forward to ensure the social benefits pursued by the government and the economic interests pursued by item company. Fourth, BOT The income adjustment fund of the project expressway is by setting the upper and lower limits of the annual income of the project (when the annual income of the project does not reach the lower limit, the government uses the initial fund of the regulation fund to subsidize the item company. When the annual income of the project exceeds the upper limit, the item company needs to inject the upper limit of that income into the regulatory Fund). The income of the item company ensures that the item company can gain a reasonable profit in the whole period of operation, while ensuring that the initial funds of the regulatory fund can be used circularly (while ensuring social benefits). Through the construction of a mathematical model, the upper and lower limits and initial quotas of the regulatory fund are determined, and the data are analyzed and discussed. Fifth, the conclusion is made. On the basis of the full text, it is suggested that the government departments take the BOT project expressway as the principle of the differential benefit pursued by the road users, and establish the BOT project regulation fund system to ensure the social benefit pursued by the government and the economic interests pursued by the item company, so as to determine the reasonable and effective BOT project highway. Pricing method.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F283

【参考文献】