对美国能源信息署涉华能源报告的评价研究

发布时间：2019-03-02 07:53

【摘要】：能源供求日益紧张,成为世界的主要问题,加之中国已经成为世界能源消费大国和生产大国,国际社会对中国能源的新闻报道或能源信息报告逐渐升温。美国能源信息署(Energy Information Administration)隶属于美国能源部,是对世界各国能源进行信息统计和发布的机构,其中,中国是其重点关注的国家之一。该机构不是新闻媒体,对有关能源问题的报告也应不同于一般的能源新闻报道,这种报告是否具有一定的态度表达、程度如何,是一个值得探讨的问题。本研究以EIA涉华能源报告6篇为语料,以评价理论为指导,同时利用UAM Corpus Tool软件和卡方检验,分析其评价资源的使用,从而探讨其态度取向。研究发现,在EIA涉华能源报告中,级差资源使用最为频繁,介入资源次之,而态度资源最少,与前两者差异显著。首先,报告最常使用级差资源来描述中国能源的地质构造、储藏量、开发程度、产量、消耗量等,尤其是较多使用了表达数量程度的词,这样更能表现报告的客观真实性。其次,在介入资源中,报告对借言的使用远远多于自言。借言中“压缩”的使用频率明显多于“扩展”,这样排除了对有关信息的其他解释,以表达EIA对其信息可靠性的坚定立场。在压缩资源中,报告更倾向于使用“否认”资源,以此对否定信息进一步肯定。在扩展资源中的“摘引”中,“承认”资源使用较多,这是因为EIA引用了较多的政府、官方或专业机构的信息,权威性较强。最后,在最少的态度资源中,鉴赏占了91.72%,而积极鉴赏占71.61%。鉴赏资源大多用来描述中国能源储藏量、地质构造、使用情况等。综上分析,EIA涉华能源报告运用了大量的数据并参考国际各种权威机构的信息,因此对中国没有特别明显的偏见和价值判断,基本上客观地传递了中国能源的发展现状。本研究可以弥补学术界对能源报告有关态度研究的空白,也可以帮助信息使用者正确解读报告内容,同时也可为撰写报告提供借鉴,促进报告的客观性和真实性。
[Abstract]:The increasing shortage of energy supply and demand has become the main problem in the world. In addition, China has become a big country of energy consumption and production in the world, and the news reports or energy information reports of China by the international community are heating up gradually. The U.S. Energy Information Agency (Energy Information Administration), which is part of the U.S. Department of Energy, is an organization that publishes energy statistics and releases from all over the world. Among them, China is one of the most important countries concerned. The agency is not the news media, and reports on energy issues should also be different from the general energy news reports, whether such reports have a certain attitude, and to what extent, is a question worthy of discussion. In this study, six EIA China-related energy reports were used as the corpus, guided by the evaluation theory, and the UAM Corpus Tool software and chi-square test were used to analyze the use of the evaluation resources, so as to discuss their attitude orientation. It is found that in the EIA China-related energy report, the use of differential resources is the most frequent, followed by intervention resources, and attitude resources are the least, which is significantly different from the former two. First of all, the report most often uses graded resources to describe China's energy geological structure, storage, development level, production, consumption and so on, especially the use of the word expressing the quantitative degree, so that it can show the objective authenticity of the report. Second, in intervention resources, the report uses much more loanwords than self-statements. The use of "compression" is much more frequent than "expansion" in the loanword, which excludes other interpretations of the information to express EIA's firm position on the reliability of its information. In compressed resources, the report prefers to use "deny" resources as a further affirmation of negative information. In the "excerpt" of expanded resources, "recognition" resources are used more because EIA cites more information from government, official or professional institutions and has a strong authority. Finally, appreciation accounted for 91.72% of the smallest amount of attitude resources, while positive appreciation accounted for 71.61%. Most of the connoisseur resources are used to describe China's energy storage, geological structure, usage and so on. Based on the analysis, the EIA China-related Energy report uses a large number of data and refers to the information of various international authorities. Therefore, there is no obvious prejudice and value judgment against China, and basically impersonal transmission of the current situation of China's energy development. This study can fill the gap of academic research on the attitude of energy report, help information users to correctly interpret the contents of the report, and at the same time provide reference for the writing of the report, and promote the objectivity and authenticity of the report.
【学位授予单位】：中国矿业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F206

【共引文献】