城市化包容性发展的综合测度及驱动因素研究
发布时间：2019-03-02 17:24
【摘要】：本文选取中国大陆30个省、自治区、直辖市地级以上城市为研究对象,对其2004-2013年城市化的包容性发展水平进行综合测度,并实证分析其驱动因素,结果表明:(1)10年间,我国城市化包容性发展水平总体较低,且呈现出"M"型发展趋势,初始和期末年份并未发生较大幅度的变动。其中,东部和东北地区呈现出下降的趋势,中部地区基本持平,西部地区有所上升,但东部地区明显高于其他三个地区。(2)城市化高度包容发展型中的省市全部位于东部地区,广东表现尤为突出;低度包容发展型和非包容发展型中的省市区基本均属于中西部地区和东北地区,广西表现最为明显。(3)对于不同的区域类型,城市化包容性发展的驱动因素有所不同,产业结构水平、政府公共规制力度、城市空间集聚水平、市场化水平及城市基础设施水平成为我国城市化包容性发展的驱动因素。对于四大板块而言,东部地区城市化包容性发展的驱动因素表现为产业结构水平、市场化水平和城市基础设施水平;中部地区表现为市场化水平和城市基础设施水平;西部地区表现为产业结构水平、政府公共规制力度、城市空间集聚水平和城市基础设施水平;东北地区表现为产业结构水平、政府公共规制力度和市场化水平。并据此提出相应的政策启示。
[Abstract]:In this paper, 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities above prefecture level in mainland China are selected as the object of study, and the inclusive development level of urbanization from 2004 to 2013 is comprehensively measured, and its driving factors are analyzed empirically. The results show that: (1) during the last 10 years, the level of inclusive development of urbanization in China is generally low, and the trend of "M" type development is present, and there is no significant change in the initial and final years. Among them, the eastern and northeast regions showed a downward trend, the central region remained basically flat, and the western region increased somewhat. However, the eastern region is obviously higher than the other three regions. (2) all the provinces and cities in the highly inclusive development type of urbanization are located in the eastern region, especially in Guangdong; The provinces, cities and regions in the low inclusive development type and non-inclusive development type basically belong to the central and western regions and northeast regions, and Guangxi has the most obvious performance. (3) for different regional types, the drivers of inclusive development of urbanization are different. The level of industrial structure, government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure are the driving factors of inclusive development of urbanization in China. For the four plates, the driving factors of the inclusive development of urbanization in the eastern region are the level of industrial structure, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure, and the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure in the central region. The level of industrial structure, the intensity of government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration and the level of urban infrastructure in the western region, and the level of industrial structure, governmental public regulation and marketization in Northeast China are the levels of industrial structure, government public regulation, and urban infrastructure. On this basis, the corresponding policy inspiration is put forward.
【作者单位】： 东北财经大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“新型城镇化的包容性发展及其空间效应研究”(14BJY052) 国家自然科学基金项目“新型城镇化的空间效应与区域政策工具组合创新”(41571121) 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目“辽宁省城市化的转型发展及路径优化研究”(LN2016YB027)
【分类号】：F299.2
本文编号：2433284
[Abstract]:In this paper, 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities above prefecture level in mainland China are selected as the object of study, and the inclusive development level of urbanization from 2004 to 2013 is comprehensively measured, and its driving factors are analyzed empirically. The results show that: (1) during the last 10 years, the level of inclusive development of urbanization in China is generally low, and the trend of "M" type development is present, and there is no significant change in the initial and final years. Among them, the eastern and northeast regions showed a downward trend, the central region remained basically flat, and the western region increased somewhat. However, the eastern region is obviously higher than the other three regions. (2) all the provinces and cities in the highly inclusive development type of urbanization are located in the eastern region, especially in Guangdong; The provinces, cities and regions in the low inclusive development type and non-inclusive development type basically belong to the central and western regions and northeast regions, and Guangxi has the most obvious performance. (3) for different regional types, the drivers of inclusive development of urbanization are different. The level of industrial structure, government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure are the driving factors of inclusive development of urbanization in China. For the four plates, the driving factors of the inclusive development of urbanization in the eastern region are the level of industrial structure, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure, and the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure in the central region. The level of industrial structure, the intensity of government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration and the level of urban infrastructure in the western region, and the level of industrial structure, governmental public regulation and marketization in Northeast China are the levels of industrial structure, government public regulation, and urban infrastructure. On this basis, the corresponding policy inspiration is put forward.
【作者单位】： 东北财经大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“新型城镇化的包容性发展及其空间效应研究”(14BJY052) 国家自然科学基金项目“新型城镇化的空间效应与区域政策工具组合创新”(41571121) 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目“辽宁省城市化的转型发展及路径优化研究”(LN2016YB027)
【分类号】：F299.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 金万富;汤晓华;陈春桥;;中国东部沿海地区碳强度对产业结构水平响应度省际差异[J];云南地理环境研究;2011年03期
2 嘉蓉梅;;产业结构水平测度模型及对地区的实证考察[J];云南社会科学;2012年04期
3 田秉涛;王晓文;李娟;;基于SSM的云南省产业结构水平测评[J];亚热带资源与环境学报;2013年01期
4 郑元凯;;浅析我国知识型失业的成因与治理对策[J];华东经济管理;2007年04期
5 张金艳;杨永聪;;瑞典碳税对产业结构水平影响的实证分析[J];战略决策研究;2011年02期
6 塔娜;王素娟;;增长极发展 点轴布局和网络布局理论及我国的选择[J];赤峰教育学院学报;2003年01期
7 方大春;;安徽地级市承接外商直接投资竞争力实证分析[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2011年03期
8 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘彩兰;服务业对外开放度对产业结构水平的影响[D];暨南大学;2011年
，本文编号：2433284
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/hongguanjingjilunwen/2433284.html
