W市L区“三公经费”控制研究
[Abstract]:"three public funds" refers to the expenditure incurred by the personnel of government administrative institutions when they go abroad on business, purchase and operate business vehicles, and receive official services. It is an important part of the operating cost of government administration. It is an important guarantee for the normal operation of state administrative organs, the management of state and social public affairs according to law, and the performance of social services. In recent years, with the development of social economy and the improvement of people's living standard, citizens' consciousness of participating in political affairs and supervision has been awakened. The operation cost and efficiency of the government administration began to become the focus of the public. In particular, since 2007, with the promulgation and implementation of the "regulations of the people's Republic of China on the opening of Government Information," government officials have used the "three public funds" to lavish and wasted money, and incidents of breaking the law of enriching their own money have been frequently exposed by the media. The focus of public attention has gradually shifted from requiring "three public funds" to supervising the legitimacy and efficiency of "three public funds" expenditures. June 30, 2011, The standing Committee of the National people's Congress has passed a resolution on approving and publicizing the budget implementation of central government administrative institutions for the year 2010. Since then, local government departments have also announced the administrative funds and the "three public funds" to the public one after another. Based on transparent government theory, sunshine government theory, responsible government theory and public budget theory, this paper tries to make clear the relevant concepts by referring to the existing research results at home and abroad, combining with the actual case analysis of the L district of W City, which is based on the theory of transparent government, the theory of sunshine government, the theory of responsible government and the theory of public budget. On the basis of solving the principal contradiction, this paper makes a thorough theoretical analysis and explanation on the control and management of the "three public funds", which are concerned by the media and the public at present. This paper attempts to discuss the countermeasures and suggestions to promote the scientific, transparent, standardized use and control of the "three public funds" of our government. There are six chapters in this paper. The first chapter is an overview. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the background of the control of "three public funds" at home and abroad, and on this basis, leads to the decision made under the premise of "three public funds" in the L district of W City under the premise of transparency. Secondly, it introduces the important significance of the control research of "three public funds", and introduces the analytical methods adopted in this paper. The second chapter, the domestic and foreign research present situation. By searching and reading the relevant documents, we can understand the problems existing in the use of the "three public funds", especially the problems existing in the use of the "three public funds", and study the relevant policies and effects that have been issued at home and abroad at present. Chapter three, the control status of "three public funds" in L district of W city. This chapter analyzes and studies the relevant data of "three public funds" from 2011 to 2013 in L area, starting with the overall data of L area, focusing on the analysis of the funds for going abroad on business, the purchase and operation cost of business vehicles. The change trend of official hospitality over the years, find out the problems existing in the use of "three public funds". Chapter four, the reason analysis of "three public funds" in L district of W city. Based on the analysis of the third chapter, this chapter analyzes the causes of the problems from the angle of budgeting, execution and adjustment. The fifth chapter, "three public funds" control measures research. On the premise of data analysis and reason analysis in the first two chapters, taking the L area of W city as the foothold, the paper puts forward the control measures to the local "three public funds", so as to extend to all regions and the whole country to solve similar problems. Chapter VI, conclusion. Summarize and extend the viewpoint of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:湖南农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F810.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜欣;;解决政府行政成本居高不下的对策建议[J];经济研究导刊;2014年30期
2 吴君;;行政主管单位如何加强“三公”经费的管理[J];商业经济;2014年19期
3 梁玉红;;“三公”经费绩效管理的问题与对策[J];党政干部论坛;2012年04期
4 李占乐;;中国政府“三公”经费公开的现状、问题与对策[J];云南社会科学;2012年02期
5 薛冬梅;;我国公共服务市场化现状及其前景探析[J];安阳工学院学报;2012年01期
6 郝洪;;“三公”公开需要“问责落地”[J];共产党员;2011年23期
7 张卫青;;从“三公”经费公开谈行政成本管理[J];中国城市经济;2011年23期
8 张志红;;“三公”经费管理中存在的问题及治理对策[J];审计与理财;2011年10期
9 张立强;陈文权;;浅析“三公”消费综合治理的路径[J];重庆社会主义学院学报;2011年05期
10 崔松涛;;公开“三公”经费有赖于加强问责[J];人大建设;2011年08期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 刘继友;;事业单位财政预算资金管理的策略分析[A];“决策论坛——如何制定科学决策学术研讨会”论文集(上)[C];2015年
2 张博;;政府行政成本合理化问题研究[A];政府管理创新理论与实践研讨会论文集[C];2011年
3 潘佳;;中国政府环境信息发布问责制度的改革——以公众参与外部问责模式为重心[A];2011中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第三卷)[C];2011年
4 邓淑莲;;预算透明衡量标准的研究视角[A];呼吁公共预算:来自政治学、公共行政学的声音——第一届中国公共预算研究全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
5 赵宇峰;廖仕梅;;公民参与和政府行为有效性的提升[A];第19届中国社会学年会社会稳定与社会管理机制研究论文集[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 周健;制度与角色的互动:当代中国政府过程研究的一个视角[D];华东师范大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 雷云;基层公务接待费用控制问题研究[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
,本文编号:2348848
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/kuaiji/2348848.html