全球矿产品定价机制下的利益分配格局分析

发布时间：2018-01-17 19:02

本文关键词：全球矿产品定价机制下的利益分配格局分析　出处：《中国矿业》2014年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文首先在理论上介绍了当前国际矿产品市场上的三种定价模式,并选取了必和必拓、埃克森美孚、自由港3家跨国资源公司和美国洲际交易所、伦敦金属交易所为研究对象,通过查阅公司年报、财经数据库等资料归类分析了上述机构股东的背景情况,以期达到分析当前矿产品定价机制下利益分配格局的目的。研究表明,无论是跨国资源公司,还是商品期货交易所,其股东均为西方发达国家的金融机构。这些股东通过早期对海外矿产资源的权益性投资,已经成为国际大宗矿产的实际控制者,他们或通过提高长期协议价格,或利用资金、信息等优势操纵矿产品期货价格,攫取超额利润。从而得出结论:西方发达国家不仅是当前国际矿产品定价规则的制定者,还是国际矿产品价格提价或波动的始作俑者及最终受益者。
[Abstract]:This paper first introduces three pricing models in the international mineral market, and selects BHP Billiton, Exxon Mobil, Freeport multinational resource companies and the Intercontinental Exchange of America. London Metal Exchange as the research object, through consulting the company annual report, financial database and other information classified and analyzed the background of the above institutional shareholders. In order to achieve the purpose of analyzing the pattern of profit distribution under the current pricing mechanism of mineral products, the research shows that, whether multinational resource companies or commodity futures exchanges. Their shareholders are financial institutions in western developed countries. Through early equity investments in overseas mineral resources, these shareholders have become de facto controllers of international bulk minerals, either by raising long-term agreement prices. Or use the advantages of funds, information and other advantages to manipulate mineral product futures prices, grab excess profits, and draw a conclusion: Western developed countries are not only the current international mineral pricing rules of the maker. It is also the initiator and ultimate beneficiary of price increase or fluctuation of international mineral products.
【作者单位】：北京大学;中国地质科学院全球矿产资源战略研究中心;
【分类号】：F416.1;F713.35
【正文快照】： 进入21世纪,国际矿产品市场需求方的主角由早期发达国家转变为诸如中国、印度等发展中国家。矿产品市场供需结构的变化理应带动定价机制的变化,可现实情况相反,当前的矿产品定价机制仍沿用了原来发达国家定下的规则,从而出现一种结果,发达国家在当前的国际矿产品定价机制下不

【参考文献】