当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 投融资论文 >

发达国家知识产权信托法律制度比较及中国借鉴研究

发布时间:2018-01-07 04:40

  本文关键词:发达国家知识产权信托法律制度比较及中国借鉴研究 出处:《华东交通大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 知识产权信托 比较研究 现状 完善


【摘要】:经济增长方式的转变,知识经济的到来,各国开始重视科技竞争,提出了“知识产权的无限创造力是科技竞争的核心”口号,把科技的先进动力转化为现实的生产力是各国的科技工作的关键。知识产权授权量的急速增加,市场对知识产权的需求量也日益增加,供需关系的不平衡这种形式急需为知识产权的转化寻找一个突破口,知识产权信托便在这种形势下应运而生。将知识产权制度信托化,一方面可以实现知识产权制度自身的价值,即服务于社会,另一方面也有利于解决我国知识产权转化中存在的转化渠道难的问题,从而实现双赢的局面,既发展了知识产权,又利用知识产权创造了经济价值。 本文拟通过分析信托制度的概念、分类和特征,提出知识产权信托法律制度的概念、分类与法律关系和知识产权信托的优势,通过分析发达美、日、欧盟等国家的知识产权信托法律制度现状以及比较其知识产权信托立法制度、登记制度和监管制度,分析我国知识产权信托法律制度的现状及存在的问题,通过对比借鉴发达国家知识产权法律制度,针对我国知识产权信托法律制度的不足之处,从完善法律法规制度、登记制度、风险防范机制、及权利归属、信托机构等方面提出针对性的建议,完善我国知识产权信托法律制度,促使我国知识产权法律制度更好的发展。 同时,本文将在分析发达国家知识产权信托法律制度现状基础上,结合“武汉的专利信托”和“中国首例商标信托案”等案例分析我国知识产权信托法律制度实证分析,具体分析我国实践中知识产权信托所存在的问题,通过对比分析立法现状、登记现状、风险防范现状等,完善我国知识产权信托法律制度。本文拟从以下六个方面进行探讨: 第一部分是绪论,主要是对本课题的来源、目的、意义及研究方法和思路做一个说明,从宏观上架构本文的结构。 第二部分是知识产权信托制度的概述,这一部分先对信托制度做一个简单的介绍,然后引出知识产权信托制度,从知识产权信托制度的起源、发展和进行知识产权信托的必要性来对知识产权信托制度做较全面的叙述。 第三部分是分析发达国家知识产权信托法律制度的现状,通过分析美国专利投资信托、美国知识产权证券化、日本的知识产权信托法律制度演变以及欧盟的知识产权信托业务状况,以便对下文的发达国家知识产权信托法律制度的比较和完善我国的知识产权信托法律制度提供参考意见。 第四部分是比较发达国家知识产权信托法律制度,通过美、日、英三国的立法制度、登记制度、监管制度分析其在监管机构及其相关法律对设立知识产权信托机构的不同规定。 第五部分是通过一些案例引出我国知识产权信托在法律制度、登记制度、风险制度、权利归属、信托机构等方面的现状,分析其存在的问题,这一部分是有针对性的对我国知识产权信托方面存在的问题列出,为后面的完善建议打下基础。 第六部分是立足于我国知识产权信托法律制度的现状及问题,针对提出的问题,借鉴发达国家对于此方面的先进经验,一一提出完善的建议,这也是本文对我国知识产权信托法律制度的经验总结。
[Abstract]:Change the mode of economic growth, the advent of knowledge economy, all countries begin to pay attention to the competition of science and technology, put forward the "infinite creativity of intellectual property is the core competition of science and technology" slogan, the advanced power technology into real productivity is the key national science and technology work. Intellectual property licensing quantity increases rapidly, the market demand for knowledge the amount of property is also increasing, the imbalance between supply and demand for this form needs the transformation of intellectual property to find a breakthrough, intellectual property trust emerges in this situation. The system of intellectual property trust, one can achieve the value of their own intellectual property system, which is to serve the society, on the other hand there are to solve the transformation of channels there are property rights in China in the transformation of knowledge difficult problem, so as to achieve a win-win situation, not only the development of intellectual property, the intellectual property rights created Economic value.
This paper through the analysis of the concept of trust system, classification and characteristics, puts forward the concept of legal system of intellectual property trust, classification and legal relationship of intellectual property trust and advantage, developed through the analysis of beauty, on the legal system of intellectual property trust status of the European Union and other countries as well as the intellectual property trust legislation system, registration system and supervision system analysis of the status quo, the trust legal system of intellectual property rights in China and the existing problems, through the comparison of the legal system of intellectual property rights in developed countries, in view of the lack of trust legal system of intellectual property rights in China at registration system from the perfect legal laws and regulations system, risk prevention mechanism, and put forward the rights of ownership, trust institutions targeted suggestions to improve the trust legal system of intellectual property in China, to promote better development of the legal system of intellectual property in China.
At the same time, the analysis of the present situation of the legal system of intellectual property trust in developed countries, combined with the "Wuhan patent trust" and "Chinese first trademark trust case and case analysis of empirical analysis of the trust legal system of intellectual property in China, analyzes problems in the intellectual property trust practice in China, through the comparative analysis of the legislative status quo registration, status quo, risk prevention status, improve the legal system of intellectual property trust in China. This paper discusses from the following six aspects:
The first part is the introduction, which mainly explains the source, purpose, significance and research methods and ideas of the subject, and constructs the structure of this article from the macro level.
The second part is an overview of intellectual property trust system, the first part of the trust system to do a simple introduction, then introduced the intellectual property trust system, from the origin of the trust system, the necessity and the development of intellectual property trust to do a more comprehensive description of the intellectual property trust system.
The third part is the analysis of the current situation of trust legal system of intellectual property rights in developed countries, through the analysis of the United States Patent Investment Trusts, the securitization of intellectual property rights, legal system of intellectual property trust evolution of Japan and EU intellectual property trust business, in order to improve the comparison of and below the developed country intellectual property trust legal system of intellectual property in China trust legal system provides a reference.
The fourth part is the legal system of intellectual property trust in developed countries. Through the legislative system, registration system and regulatory system in the United States, Japan, Britain and the United Kingdom, it analyzes the different provisions of the regulatory agencies and their related laws on the establishment of intellectual property trust institutions.
The fifth part is through some cases leads to our country's intellectual property trust in the legal system, registration system, risk system, ownership rights, the current situation of trust institutions, analyzes the existing problems, this part is targeted on the existence of China's intellectual property trust issues listed, suggestions to lay the foundation for later perfect.
The sixth part is based on the current situation and problems of the legal system of intellectual property trust in China. Aiming at the problems raised, and using the advanced experience of developed countries for reference, we put forward perfect proposals one by one, which is also the experience summary of our legal system of intellectual property trust.

【学位授予单位】:华东交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.282

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 卞耀武;;中国的信托法律制度[J];中国法律;2003年02期

2 余辉;近现代英国信托法律制度的确立[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2003年06期

3 余辉;信托法律制度的肇始——英国1536年《用益法》[J];环球法律评论;2003年03期

4 袁碧华;信托法律制度的承继与本土化——信托法律制度的比较研究[J];广东商学院学报;2003年06期

5 王海英;邓延良;;论我国信托法律制度的完善[J];商业经济;2008年02期

6 蔡庆辉;论我国信托法律制度的现状与立法的完善[J];东南学术;1998年04期

7 蔡庆辉;论我国信托法律制度现状与立法完善[J];云南法学;1998年04期

8 黄晓慧;香港信托法律制度浅探[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年09期

9 李抗;信托法律制度及其在我国的实践[J];贵州商专学报;1994年04期

10 王金玉;;信托法律制度的冲突法分析及其适用[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2008年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 记者 姜瑜 李茜;完善信托法律制度刻不容缓[N];上海金融报;2011年

2 邱金枝 梁善宝 邹德彦;信托能帮助解决银行不良债权[N];检察日报;2002年

3 黄嵩;财产权信托法律制度亟待完善[N];中国证券报;2004年

4 邓梅芳;金融创新亟需建立完善法律制度[N];国际金融报;2001年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 石纬林;信托法律制度的经济分析[D];吉林大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 于文君;中外信托法律制度比较研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2007年

2 李毅;房地产投资信托法律制度研究[D];中央民族大学;2010年

3 王丹;我国农村土地信托法律制度研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年

4 付玉林;中外信托法律制度比较研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2005年

5 卢承灏;我国信托法律制度的确立与完善[D];对外经济贸易大学;2004年

6 王湘平;我国农村土地信托法律制度之研究[D];中南大学;2007年

7 赵婷;公益信托法律制度研究[D];西北大学;2010年

8 肖玉生;论信托法律制度下受托人的义务[D];西北大学;2008年

9 陈禹;我国房地产信托法律制度的完善[D];吉林大学;2014年

10 刘永锋;农村土地信托法律制度研究[D];兰州大学;2006年



本文编号:1391038

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/touziyanjiulunwen/1391038.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2b188***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com