票据空白背书法律实证分析

发布时间：2018-03-17 16:31

本文选题：票据　切入点：空白背书　出处：《新疆大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：空白背书票据是市场经济追求效率的产物,在贸易交往中空白背书大量存在,但我国票据立法不承认此种背书的形式,不仅与世界的主流趋势相违背,还引起了许多纠纷浪费了司法资源,阻碍了票据的流通。笔者在引言中提出与空白背书票据相关的问题,引出一个经典案例,简要介绍了案例中因空白背书票据引起争议的始末,及一审、二审法院不同的判决结果。继而分析上面的案例并提出空白背书票据在实践中的矛盾之处:我国不认可空白背书票据的法律效力,但商业活动中该种票据大量存在,为了更好的解决该类纠纷我国是否应承认空白背书票据的法律效力。笔者将论文分为三个部分进行与其相关的阐述:第一部分:主要是围绕着引言部分提出的问题进行论述分析。首先,阐述了我国空白背书票据的基本概念及我国对该种票据的法律制度;其次,论述了我国不承认空白背书法律效力的表现在以下几方面:空白背书的连续性认定有问题,补充记载权不明确,否定单纯交付方式等原因;最后,提出空白背书法律效力争议的原由主要包括:空白背书票据流转风险较大,该种票据不利于保护持票人利益,我国空白背书制度处于探索期。第二部分:主要是对空白背书票据相关域外立法的阐述,笔者通过查阅域外关于空白背书票据法律效力、补充记载权、单纯交付、连续性等方面的立法,对比出我国在这几方面立法的不足。第三部分:笔者在这一部分阐述承认空白背书票据的必要性主要包括:便捷空白背书票据的流通,该种票据的隐秘性及我国市场发展奠定了承认空白背书票据的基础。进一步提出立法建议。为票据的流通性提供坚实的保障,进一步保护受让人的债权。
[Abstract]:Blank endorsement instrument is the result of the market economy pursuing efficiency. There are a large number of blank endorsements in trade exchanges. However, our bill legislation does not recognize the form of endorsement, which is not only contrary to the mainstream trend of the world. Also caused many disputes wasted judicial resources, hindered the circulation of bills. In the introduction, the author raised issues related to blank endorsed bills, leading to a classic case. This paper briefly introduces the disputes caused by the blank endorsement bill in the case, and the first instance. After analyzing the above cases, the author points out the contradiction of blank endorsement bill in practice: our country does not accept the legal effect of blank endorsement bill, but in commercial activities, this kind of instrument exists in large quantities. In order to solve this kind of dispute better our country should recognize the legal effect of blank endorsement bill. The author divides the thesis into three parts to explain it: the first part: mainly about the question raised in the introduction part. First of all, This paper expounds the basic concept of blank endorsement instrument in our country and the legal system of this kind of instrument in our country. Secondly, it discusses that the legal effect of blank endorsement is not recognized in our country in the following aspects: the continuous recognition of blank endorsement is problematic. The reasons why the legal effect of blank endorsement are disputed include: the circulation risk of blank endorsement bill is greater, and this kind of instrument is not conducive to the protection of the holder's interests. China's blank endorsement system is in the exploration period. The second part is mainly about the extraneous legislation on blank endorsement instruments. In the third part, the author expounds the necessity of recognizing the blank endorsement instrument, which includes: the convenient circulation of the blank endorsement instrument, The secrecy of this kind of instrument and the development of our country's market have laid the foundation of recognizing the blank endorsement instrument, further put forward the legislative suggestion, provide the solid safeguard for the negotiable property of the bill, and further protect the creditor's rights of the transferee.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.287

【相似文献】