环境规制对技术进步的影响研究
发布时间:2018-03-06 01:17
本文选题:环境规制 切入点:技术进步 出处:《安徽工业大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着粗放式经济的快速发展,环境污染与经济发展模式之间存在的矛盾尤其突出。如何在社会发展中让有限的环境资源达到最优利用是全社会所关注的问题。从政策层面来看,环境规制政策是经济发展和保护环境的制度保证。技术进步作为经济发展的动力源泉,在长期的节能减排中具有重要意义。因此研究环境规制对技术进步的影响意义重大。本文在考虑区域差异的同时,也从不同所有权企业角度进行了分析。首先,阐述了环境规制对技术进步的直接与间接作用,直接作用包括短时间内的成本效应与长时间内的创新补偿效应,间接作用主要包括外商投资、企业利润率、企业环境战略以及人力资本和研发资金等这些方面的影响;然后通过2000—2014年区域以及不同所有权企业的数据进行分析,使用Solow余值计算技术进步指标,运用系统GMM研究得出结论:(一)技术进步在东部、中部、西部区域具有负向滞后效应,而且对国有及控股企业和私营企业的滞后作用同样为负,对外商投资企业的技术进步显著为正。(二)环境规制强度对地区的技术进步水平提高具有促进作用,同时对外商投资企业的技术进步水平也存在正向影响,但是对国有及控股和私营企业的技术改进具有抑制作用。私营企业表现不明显。(三)环境规制与FDI效应两者的交互作用对不同客体的影响结果不同。在东部与西部地区两者的交互作用为正,而在中部地区呈现不显著的负向效应。考虑到不同所有权企业时,两者的交互作用对三大企业的技术进步都呈现显著的正向促进影响。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of extensive economy, the contradiction between environmental pollution and economic development model is especially prominent. How to optimize the utilization of limited environmental resources in social development is the concern of the whole society. Environmental regulation policy is the institutional guarantee of economic development and environmental protection. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the impact of environmental regulation on technological progress. This paper takes into account the regional differences, but also from the perspective of different ownership enterprises. This paper expounds the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on technological progress, including the cost effect in a short period of time and the innovation compensation effect in a long time. The indirect effects mainly include the foreign investment and the profit rate of the enterprise. Impact of business environmental strategies and human capital and R & D funding; then analysed using data on regional and different ownership enterprises for the period 2000-2014, using Solow residual values to calculate technical progress indicators, By using systematic GMM research, it is concluded that: (1) technological progress in the eastern, central and western regions has a negative lag effect, and the lag effect on state-owned and holding enterprises and private enterprises is also negative. The technological progress of foreign-invested enterprises is significantly positive. (2) the intensity of environmental regulation has a positive effect on the improvement of regional technological progress, and also has a positive impact on the level of technological progress of foreign-invested enterprises. But it can inhibit the technological improvement of state-owned, holding and private enterprises. The performance of private enterprises is not obvious. (3) the interaction between environmental regulation and FDI effect has different effects on different objects. In the east and west, the influence of the interaction of environmental regulation and FDI effect on different objects is different. The interaction between the two parts of the region is positive, But in the middle region, the negative effect is not significant. Considering the different ownership enterprises, the interaction between them has a significant positive impact on the technological progress of the three major enterprises.
【学位授予单位】:安徽工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F273.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 原毅军;谢荣辉;;环境规制与工业绿色生产率增长——对“强波特假说”的再检验[J];中国软科学;2016年07期
2 陈峥;高红贵;;环境规制约束下技术进步对产业结构调整的影响研究——基于自主研发和技术引进的角度分析[J];科技管理研究;2016年12期
3 尤济红;王鹏;;环境规制能否促进R&D偏向于绿色技术研发?——基于中国工业部门的实证研究[J];经济评论;2016年03期
4 张宇青;吴金南;;环境规制、外商直接投资与技术进步——对OECD国家“波特假说”的检验[J];科学管理研究;2016年01期
5 蔡o勖,
本文编号:1572710
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/1572710.html