当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 企业经济论文 >

企业社会责任、公司治理与管理层风险承担

发布时间:2018-03-07 22:38

  本文选题:企业社会责任 切入点:管理层风险承担 出处:《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:近年来随着金融危机的后续影响,我国实体经济能否在外部环境不确定因素的影响下平稳健康发展越来越重要。在我国经济转型升级、产业结构调整的背景下,可以将管理层风险承担作为一个契机,以此促进企业的价值增值、行业的蓬勃发展。在传统的代理理论下,管理层与股东对风险的不同偏好,引发了学者对管理层风险承担问题的兴趣。管理层较高的风险承担,有助于企业获得更高的投资回报,提升未来财务绩效,增强长期竞争优势,加快整个社会的资本积累,实现经济的长期增长。此外,随着政府出台各项有关企业社会责任的政策和指导性文件,将企业社会责任的问题提升到国家层面,引起了社会各界的广泛讨论。基于此,本文围绕企业社会责任对管理层风险承担的具体作用,为推进企业社会责任披露提供数据支持,丰富企业风险承担影响因素的相关文献,进而对我国推进企业社会责任披露、规范公司风险承担提供参考建议。本文采用理论分析与实证研究相结合的方法,对相关概念进行界定后,以委托代理理论、利益相关者理论和信号传递理论为基础,对国内外文献研究进行回顾和整理,发现已有学者对企业社会责任和风险承担两方面的研究已分别有不少成果,但鲜有文献直接探讨企业社会责任对管理层风险承担的影响。因此本文构建了企业社会责任与管理层风险承担之间的模型,并纳入公司治理这一调节变量,检验其对二者关系的调节作用。实证方面,本文以2009-2015年我国沪深两市A股上市公司为样本,运用描述性统计、相关性分析、回归分析等方法,实证检验本文的研究假设。研究结果表明,上市公司企业社会责任对管理层风险承担有显著的正向影响,不同的公司治理机制对二者关系的影响不同。本文的大部分假设得到验证,第一,企业社会责任披露得分越高,管理层风险承担越高;第二,独立董事比例、董事会规模、前三名高管薪酬、高级管理者持股比例等公司治理指标,能够促进企业社会责任对管理层风险承担的正向影响作用;第三,第一大股东持股比例会削弱社会责任提高管理层风险承担的作用,而两职合一指标的回归结果不显著。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the subsequent impact of the financial crisis, it is more and more important for the real economy of our country to develop smoothly and healthily under the influence of the uncertain external environment. We can take the risk assumption of management as an opportunity to promote the value increment of enterprises and the flourishing development of the industry. Under the traditional agency theory, the managers and shareholders have different preferences for risk. It has aroused scholars' interest in the risk assumption of management. Higher risk taking by management can help enterprises to obtain higher return on investment, improve future financial performance, enhance long-term competitive advantage, and accelerate the capital accumulation of the whole society. Achieving long-term economic growth. In addition, with the adoption of various policies and guidance documents on corporate social responsibility by the Government, the issue of corporate social responsibility has been raised to the national level, which has aroused widespread discussion in all sectors of society. This paper focuses on the specific role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on management risk, provides data support for the promotion of CSR disclosure, enriches the relevant literature on the influencing factors of corporate social responsibility, and then promotes CSR disclosure in China. This paper uses the method of combining theoretical analysis and empirical research to define the relevant concepts, based on the principal-agent theory, stakeholder theory and signaling theory. Reviewing and sorting out the domestic and foreign literature, it is found that there have been many achievements in the research of corporate social responsibility and risk bearing. However, there are few literatures directly discussing the influence of corporate social responsibility on the risk assumption of management. Therefore, this paper constructs a model between corporate social responsibility and risk assumption of management, and brings into account the regulatory variable of corporate governance. In the empirical aspect, taking the A-share listed companies of Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets in China from 2009-2015 as a sample, using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis and so on, The results show that corporate social responsibility (CSR) has a significant positive impact on the risk assumption of the management. Most of the assumptions in this paper are verified. First, the higher the score of corporate social responsibility disclosure, the higher the risk of management; second, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the board of directors. The top three executive compensation, the proportion of senior managers holding shares and other corporate governance indicators can promote the positive impact of corporate social responsibility on management risks; third, The proportion of the first largest shareholder will weaken the role of social responsibility to increase the risk assumption of management, but the regression result of the two-in-one index is not significant.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F270;F271;F272.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘传俊;杨希;;企业社会责任对风险承担能力影响的研究——基于利益相关者理论[J];当代经济;2016年22期

2 张敏;童丽静;许浩然;;社会网络与企业风险承担——基于我国上市公司的经验证据[J];管理世界;2015年11期

3 陈丽蓉;韩彬;杨兴龙;;企业社会责任与高管变更交互影响研究——基于A股上市公司的经验证据[J];会计研究;2015年08期

4 苏坤;;管理层股权激励、风险承担与资本配置效率[J];管理科学;2015年03期

5 石大林;;管理层薪酬激励与公司风险承担间的关系——基于动态内生性的经验研究[J];金融发展研究;2015年01期

6 关伯明;邓荣霖;;董事会结构特征与公司风险承担关系实证研究[J];现代管理科学;2015年01期

7 崔胜凯;石大林;杨琼;;管理层权力、投资机会与公司风险承担[J];中国注册会计师;2014年08期

8 李国平;韦晓茜;;企业社会责任内涵、度量与经济后果——基于国外企业社会责任理论的研究综述[J];会计研究;2014年08期

9 钱先航;徐业坤;;官员更替、政治身份与民营上市公司的风险承担[J];经济学(季刊);2014年04期

10 尹开国;刘小芹;陈华东;;基于内生性的企业社会责任与财务绩效关系研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J];中国软科学;2014年06期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 沈洪涛;公司社会责任与公司财务业绩关系研究[D];厦门大学;2005年



本文编号:1581308

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/1581308.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户823ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com