零售商竞争环境下两周期闭环供应链回收渠道选择研究

发布时间：2018-04-19 05:20

本文选题：闭环供应链 + 两周期　；参考：《系统管理学报》2017年06期

【摘要】：在零售商竞争环境下,建立两周期闭环供应链回收渠道决策模型,得出制造商回收和零售商回收两种模式下的利润、销售量及绿色活动项目指标。从企业效益、环境效益和社会效益三方面分析制造商的最优回收渠道选择,并判断零售商之间的竞争是否会对制造商的选择产生影响。研究结果表明:在成本结构相同的条件下,制造商的回收渠道选择与两零售商之间的竞争程度并无关系,制造商的选择可以实现企业、环境和社会效益的统一;而当成本结构不同时,如果制造商只从环境效益角度选择最优回收渠道时,才可能和两个零售商之间的竞争程度相关,从而表明,制造商的选择并不总是能实现企业、环境和社会效益的统一;而在考虑绿色活动项目时,不管其有效性是否相同,制造商回收渠道的选择均与两个零售商之间的竞争程度无关,从而表明,制造商的选择可以实现企业、环境和社会效益的统一。
[Abstract]:In the environment of retailer competition, the decision model of two-cycle closed-loop supply chain recovery channel is established, and the profit, sales volume and green activity item index are obtained under the two models of manufacturer recovery and retailer recovery.This paper analyzes the optimal recovery channel choice of manufacturer from three aspects of enterprise benefit, environmental benefit and social benefit, and judges whether the competition among retailers will affect the choice of manufacturer.The results show that under the same cost structure, the choice of recovery channel has no relation with the competition degree between the two retailers, and the choice of manufacturer can realize the unity of enterprise, environment and social benefit.When the cost structure is different, if the manufacturer chooses the optimal recovery channel only from the point of view of environmental benefit, it is likely to be related to the degree of competition between the two retailers, which shows that the manufacturer's choice is not always able to realize the enterprise.Harmonization of environmental and social benefits; and when considering green activity projects, regardless of their effectiveness, the choice of the manufacturer's recycling channel is independent of the degree of competition between the two retailers, thus indicating that,Manufacturer's choice can realize the unification of enterprise, environment and social benefit.
【作者单位】：南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院;南京航空航天大学金城学院;
【基金】：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2017SJB2055)
【分类号】：F274

【相似文献】