社交指数、风险倾向与创业——制度环境的调节作用

发布时间：2018-07-05 05:24

本文选题：社交指数 + 风险倾向　；参考：《科技进步与对策》2017年01期

【摘要】：创业不仅是经济持续增长的动力,也是新常态下我国经济增长方式转变的重要源泉。从个人社交指数和风险倾向着手,分析其对个人创业的影响,同时考虑政府干预、市场成熟度和产权保护水平对社交指数和风险倾向与创业之间的调节作用,并将个人特质和区域因素作为控制变量纳入分析框架,运用CGSS 3年的数据进行实证分析。结果表明,个人社交指数对创业具有正向影响,个人风险倾向对创业的影响存在区域异质性。在农村地区,个人风险倾向对创业活动具有正向影响,即风险倾向越高,创业概率越大;而在城镇,个人风险倾向对创业的影响为负。在制度环境层面,政府干预和市场成熟度对创业具有负向影响,产权保护水平与创业之间存在"倒U型"关系,制度环境对社交指数与创业之间的关系具有调节作用,较高政府干预力度和较低市场成熟度使社交指数与创业负相关,而产权保护水平的调节作用则较弱;制度环境对风险倾向的调节作用较弱。
[Abstract]:Entrepreneurship is not only the driving force of sustained economic growth, but also the important source of the transformation of economic growth mode under the new normal. From the perspective of social index and risk propensity, this paper analyzes the influence of social index and risk propensity on individual entrepreneurship, taking into account government intervention, market maturity and property rights protection level, which regulate social index and risk propensity with entrepreneurship. Personal traits and regional factors are taken as control variables into the framework of the analysis, using CGSS data of 3 years to carry out empirical analysis. The results show that personal social index has a positive impact on entrepreneurship, and personal risk propensity has regional heterogeneity. In rural areas, personal risk propensity has a positive impact on entrepreneurial activity, that is, the higher the risk tendency, the greater the entrepreneurial probability, while in the town, the personal risk tendency has a negative impact on entrepreneurship. At the level of institutional environment, government intervention and market maturity have a negative impact on entrepreneurship, there is a "inverted U" relationship between the level of property rights protection and entrepreneurship, and institutional environment has a regulatory role on the relationship between social index and entrepreneurship. Higher government intervention and lower market maturity make the social index negatively correlated with entrepreneurship, while the regulatory effect of property rights protection level is weaker, and the regulatory effect of institutional environment on risk propensity is weak.
【作者单位】：南京理工大学经济管理学院;江苏人才发展战略研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDA053) 国家自然科学基金项目(71673135) 江苏省应用研究重大项目(16WTA002) 江苏省研究生教育教学改革研究与实践项目(JGZZ15_021)
【分类号】：F279.2

【相似文献】