博元投资公司违规信息披露案研究
[Abstract]:Many literatures show that good corporate governance has a positive impact on the quality of information disclosure of listed companies. This view can also be seen in recent years in a large number of capital markets due to corporate governance problems resulting in information disclosure of listed companies. The company is essentially a "person" organization, while the corporate governance structure is the result of a game between the stakeholders under the framework of laws, systems and rules. Therefore, the corporate governance characteristics, such as ownership structure, management structure and so on, are the deep reasons for the listed companies to disclose accounting information illegally when facing the external pressure, especially the threshold pressure from the capital market regulation. This point, however, is often ignored by the academic community. This paper tries to re-examine the case of information disclosure in the perspective of corporate governance. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first chapter introduces the background of this paper, and reviews the current research situation of corporate governance and accounting information quality at home and abroad. Then it analyzes the influence mechanism of corporate governance structure on the quality of accounting information disclosure in theory; chapter three introduces the beginning and end of the case of investment violation information disclosure; the fourth chapter uses the results of theoretical analysis in chapter two. From the perspective of corporate governance, this paper deeply analyzes the reasons of the information disclosure cases and puts forward suggestions for improvement. The fifth chapter is the inspiration and limitations of this paper. This paper argues that the decentralized ownership structure of Boyuan Investment Company is the deep reason for the illegal information disclosure. This kind of ownership structure leads to the mismatch between the control right of the company and the share right of residual income. When the company faces the pressure of capital market threshold, the actual controller either chooses the escape strategy, which shows that the company frequently changes its ownership. Either through accounting fraud to relieve the pressure, desperate. In order to improve the quality of corporate information disclosure, the suggestions of this paper are: first, to improve the degree of ownership concentration, that is, to increase the matching degree between control right and residual income sharing right; second, to increase the shareholding ratio of institutional investors; Third, to give full play to the system of independent directors and the system of the board of supervisors to the system of checks and balances on actual controllers; fourth, to increase the cost of information disclosure by listed companies in violation of regulations, that is, the CSRC should increase penalties for listed companies that violate the disclosure of information. To increase the executive power of the delisting system.
【学位授予单位】:吉林财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F832.39;F275
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尹筑嘉;黄建欢;肖敏;;一股独大不利于公司治理吗——基于持股模式和两类治理成本的经验证据[J];广东财经大学学报;2015年06期
2 杜聿辉;王东升;;公司治理与会计信息质量的相关性研究[J];企业改革与管理;2015年17期
3 闫华红;包楠;;会计信息披露与投资者利益保护[J];财政研究;2015年01期
4 夏小林;;2014年:国企与改革(下)——兼评被污名化的“国资一股独大”[J];管理学刊;2014年05期
5 夏小林;;2014年:国企与改革(中)——兼评被污名化的“国资一股独大”[J];管理学刊;2014年04期
6 夏小林;;2014年:国企与改革(上)——兼评被污名化的“国资一股独大”[J];管理学刊;2014年03期
7 刘绍娓;万大艳;;高管薪酬与公司绩效:国有与非国有上市公司的实证比较研究[J];中国软科学;2013年02期
8 闫华红;殷冰洁;;国有上市公司非效率投资行为检验及影响因素分析[J];经济与管理研究;2010年05期
9 吴国萍;马施;;上市公司财务压力与信息披露违规实证研究[J];财经理论与实践;2010年02期
10 汤茜;;基于上市公司与投资者利益博弈的信息披露真实性分析[J];财会通讯;2010年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 胡萍;;从投资策略看2017财富管理市场变局[N];金融时报;2017年
2 于换军;;上市公司信息披露是把“双刃剑”[N];证券日报;2015年
3 肖祯;;信息披露漏洞需要堵住[N];中国会计报;2014年
,本文编号:2183698
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2183698.html