连片特困地区参与式扶贫绩效评价

发布时间：2018-01-20 03:21

本文关键词： 连片特困地区参与式扶贫贫困测度绩效　出处：《湘潭大学》2013年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：贫困是一个不断演化的概念，正视贫困并采取积极有效的举措降低贫困发生率，减缓贫困程度，是理所当然而势在必行之事。不论是从外在表现还是内在原因来看，贫困都具有多维度特征，往往涉及到政治、经济、文化、教育等多个层面。事实上，贫困状态不仅外在表现为收入与消费水平的低下，更是一种内在的能力缺位现象。因此，从贫困根源入手考虑扶贫问题，重在对贫困者能力的培养。就现状而言，我国贫困所呈现出的连片特困局势已经引起了越来越多的关注，以往的扶贫模式已不再适应这一新形势。考虑及此，参与式扶贫模式的提出与实施有其必然性与必要性。然而，尽管参与式扶贫模式响应了当前主流的贫困与反贫困观点，其具体实践效果却不尽如人意，存在扶贫资金使用效率低下、扶贫瞄准精度较差、贫困者参与程度欠佳等亟待解决的现实问题。对连片特困地区参与式扶贫模式运行绩效进行评价，探讨其存在的问题，并提出行之有效的解决方式，是本论文研究的基本出发点。为此，，基于DEA基本理论与方法，我们确立了两个相互联系的指标体系，其一是贫困的多维度测度指标体系，其二是参与式扶贫绩效评价指标体系，两者具有DEA评价模型相同框架，都可以用以测评反贫困绩效。贫困多维度测度指标体系涵盖经济发展、医疗卫生、人口素质、居住环境多个维度，采用DEA方法确定指标权重，以DEA输出效率指标值反映贫困状态，在多准则意义下测度对象所处的福利状态。参与式扶贫绩效评价指标体系则借助标准的DEA输入-输出框架，通过对参与式扶贫模式广度与强度的量化，测评其对贫困发生率与贫困程度的影响，从而完成具体扶贫举措的相对有效性评价。两个指标体系的区别是明显的，前者借助贫困测度以间接方式评价扶贫举措有效性，而后者则直接评价扶贫举措的反贫困效果。以DEA理论与方法探讨贫困问题，在贫困测度基础上考察参与式扶贫绩效评价，这是本文研究的主要特色。进一步地，我们利用所构建的贫困测度指标体系评价了贵州省88个县域单位的贫困状态，并指出处于连片特困区域的66个县域单位的贫困聚类现象。在贫困测度基础上，我们借助DEA-Logistic回归模型考察了经济增长、县域单位行政属性、自治县属性、城镇化进程等因素对贵州省县域单位贫困状况的影响，以一种间接的方式评价了代表性连片特困地区参与式扶贫模式的运行绩效。实证分析结果表明：城镇化水平可显著解释参与式扶贫绩效。最后，考虑到连片特困地区的贫困特征及参与式扶贫绩效实证分析结果，我们提出了若干政策建议，以提升参与式扶贫绩效，减缓连片特困地区贫困程度，降低其贫困发生率。主要包括：加强扶贫资金项目管理，优化目标绩效考评指标体系；加强片区之间的协同与合作；因地制宜开展参与式扶贫开发项目；强化连片特困地区基础设施建设；重视连片特困地区人力资源开发；加快城乡一体化进程，等等。概言之，我们构建了一个参与式扶贫绩效评价的概念性分析框架，全方位地运用DEA理论与方法进行绩效评价，并将之应用于连片特困地区贫困问题研究，认为确有必要采用参与式扶贫模式进行扶贫开发，但在其具体实施过程中也暴露出针对性不够、过度典型化、贫困者被绑架等具体问题，针对这些问题，提出了若干政策建议。本文的创新也体现在这几个方面。
[Abstract]:Poverty is a constantly evolving concept. Facing the poverty and taking positive and effective measures to reduce the incidence of poverty and slow down the level of poverty is a matter of course.
Whether from the appearance or internal reasons, poverty has the characteristics of multi dimension, often involving politics, economy, culture, education and other aspects. In fact, the poor state of not only the external manifestations of the income and consumption level is low, it is an inherent ability of the absence of the phenomenon. Therefore, from the root of poverty considering the poverty problem, cultivation of poor ability. Focusing on the status quo, China's poor showing the destitute situation has attracted more and more attention in the past, the poverty alleviation mode is no longer adapt to this new situation. For this, participatory poverty reduction model is put forward and the implementation of its inevitability and necessity. However, despite the participatory poverty reduction model in response to the current mainstream view of poverty and anti poverty, the practice effect is not satisfactory, inefficient use of funds for poverty alleviation, aimed at poor precision, The practical problems that need to be solved urgently for the poor are poor participation. The evaluation of the performance of participatory poverty alleviation mode in continuous poverty stricken areas, exploring the existing problems and putting forward effective solutions is the basic starting point of this paper.
Therefore, based on the basic theory and methods of DEA, we established two interrelated index system, which is a multi dimension index system to measure poverty, the second is to participate in the evaluation index system of poverty alleviation performance, the two have the same framework of DEA evaluation model, can be used to evaluate the performance of anti poverty. Poverty multidimensional index system covers economic development, health, population quality, multiple dimensions of the living environment, using the DEA method to determine the index weight, DEA output efficiency index to reflect the poverty measurement object in multi criteria under the welfare state. DEA input output framework of participatory poverty alleviation performance evaluation index system by means of the standard, the to quantify the breadth and intensity of participation mode of poverty alleviation, the evaluation of the incidence of poverty and poverty degree, thus completing the relative efficiency evaluation of specific poverty alleviation initiatives. Two means The difference between standard system is obvious, the former with the help of poverty measurement in an indirect way to evaluation of effectiveness of poverty alleviation initiatives, the latter direct evaluation of anti-poverty initiatives in anti-poverty. Discuss the problem of poverty in DEA theory and method, based on the investigation in poverty measurement in evaluation of poverty alleviation performance, which is the main characteristic of this paper.
Further, we use the poverty measurement index system of the evaluation of the 88 counties of Guizhou province poverty, and pointed out that the poverty counties clustering phenomenon of 66 contiguous poor areas. On the basis of the measurement of poverty, we use DEA-Logistic regression model to examine the economic growth of county administrative units, autonomous county property, property the process of urbanization, influence factors such as the county of Guizhou province unit of poverty, the performance in an indirect way to evaluate the representative contiguous poor areas of participatory poverty reduction model. The empirical analysis results show that the level of urbanization can significantly explain the participatory poverty reduction performance.
Finally, considering the analysis results and the empirical performance of poverty alleviation poverty characteristics in the contiguous poor areas, we put forward several policy suggestions to improve the performance of participatory poverty alleviation, poverty alleviation of contiguous poor areas, to reduce the incidence of poverty. Poverty alleviation funds mainly include: strengthen project management, optimize the evaluation index system of target performance; strengthen the area between the coordination and cooperation; to carry out participatory poverty alleviation projects; strengthen the contiguous poor areas of infrastructure construction; pay attention to the development of human resources in poor areas contiguous; accelerating urban and rural integration, and so on.
In the end, we construct a participatory poverty alleviation performance evaluation of the conceptual framework, the full range of DEA using the theory and method of performance evaluation, and applied to the research on the problem of poverty in poor areas contiguous, deems it necessary to adopt participatory poverty reduction model of poverty alleviation and development, but in the specific implementation process also exposed for is not enough, over the typical, poor kidnapped and other specific issues, to solve these problems, and puts forward some policy suggestions. The innovation of this paper is also reflected in the following aspects.

【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F126

【参考文献】