土地“招拍挂”对投资总额及其结构的影响

发布时间：2018-04-10 02:04

本文选题：“招拍挂”　切入点：地方政府　出处：《华中科技大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：无论是在短期经济波动还是长期经济增长领域，投资在宏观经济中有着重要的作用。与发达国家、发展中国家和世界平均水平相比，我国的资本形成率都严重偏高。土地“招拍挂”实施一方面使土地价格快速上涨，直接影响着厂商的投资决策，，另一方面地方政府的收入增加，而地方政府无论出于政治还是经济利益都将加强对地方投资的干预，也间接影响着厂商的投资行为。本文分析土地“招拍挂”制度对总量投资的影响机制，简单分析了政府的投资行为，并按国有和非国有两种厂商的性质分类，运用数理模型重点分析了两种类型厂商在此背景下的行为。“招拍挂”制度使地方政府收入增加，将加大投资，并有效地带动了企业投资，从而表现为总投资量上升，这种效应在我国东、中和西部没有明显的差异。实证结果也表明，地方政府的从以前的政策支持投资，到对投资的直接拉动，并没有改变总量投资的结构，也即总量投资中国有经济投资占比并没有明显的变化。从扩大投资的角度来讲，政府对投资的激励作用，相比于隐性的支持，运用市场机制的公开引导更加有效，并且这种引导行为不会对区域投资差距产生负面的影响，投资结构中的国有经济投资占全社会总投资的比重也不会有明显上升。我国目前的资本形成率已经很高，而土地“招拍挂”制度的实施使其更进一步地走高，这不利于经济结构的调整，因此，惟有限制地方政府对土地收入的支配权才能解决该问题。
[Abstract]:Investment plays an important role in both short-term economic fluctuations and long-term economic growth.Compared with the developed countries, developing countries and the world average, China's capital formation rate is on the high side.On the one hand, land prices rise rapidly, which directly affects the investment decisions of manufacturers; on the other hand, local governments' income increases.The local government will strengthen the intervention in the local investment both for political and economic benefit, and indirectly affect the investment behavior of the firms.This paper analyzes the influence mechanism of the land "bidding system" on the total investment, and simply analyzes the government's investment behavior, and classifies it according to the nature of state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises.The mathematical model is used to analyze the behavior of two types of manufacturers in this context.The system of "recruitment, auction and hanging" will increase the local government's income, increase the investment, and effectively promote the enterprise's investment, thus the total investment quantity will increase. This effect has no obvious difference in the east, middle and west of our country.The empirical results also show that the structure of the total investment has not changed from the previous policies to the direct pull of the local government, that is, the proportion of the total investment in the state-owned economy has not changed significantly.From the angle of expanding investment, the incentive function of the government to investment is more effective than the implicit support, and the public guidance of market mechanism is more effective, and this kind of guidance behavior will not have a negative impact on the regional investment gap.Investment structure in the state-owned economy investment in the total investment in the whole society will not have a significant increase.The current capital formation rate in China is already very high, and the implementation of the land "recruitment, shooting and hanging" system makes it go further higher, which is not conducive to the adjustment of the economic structure.The problem can only be solved by restricting the local government's power to control land income.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F301;F124

【相似文献】