基于环境绩效的中国能源技术效率变迁

发布时间：2018-04-27 21:13

本文选题：环境绩效 + 价格诱致性　；参考：《浙江工商大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：环境约束背景下如何高效地利用能源,科学地整合各类资源,合理地引导技术进步是当前我国经济发展的重要议题之一。本文立足我国经济运行的潜在规律,结合现有文献中关于能源技术效率变迁的理论空缺,在综合考虑环境非合意产出的基础上,采用方向距离函数将能源技术效率分解为外生技术效率和能源价格诱致性的技术效率,并通过考察两者的影响因素,试图探讨我国能源技术效率的变迁路径。本文运用我国30个省份1997-2011年期间的面板数据测度了仅随时间变动的外生技术效率和区域能源价格诱致性技术效率,结果发现我国能源技术效率的波动存在明显的时段性特征,其中外生技术效率的波动方向与要素的流动性相关,存在累积效应,按照流动性的强弱可分为三个时段：1997-1999年的负增长阶段,2000-2002年的零增长阶段和2003-2010年的正增长阶段；能源价格诱致性技术效率波动规律整体上与能源价格波动方向相同,但存在一定的滞后性,按照波动幅度可分为1997-2006年波动较小时期和2007-2010年波动较大时期。本文还通过影响因素分析进一步研究了能源技术效率的内在影响机理。研究发现,就外生技术效率而言,FDI、RD投入影响并不显著,存在一定的自发性,RD人员数量的增加加快了技术研发的步伐,经济增长带动的技术进步会对外生技术效率形成挤占,资本投入的增加会通过改善外部环境促进技术水平的提高,二氧化硫排放量约束有助于促进粗放型增长区域技术水平的提升,二氧化碳排放量呈现显著的负相关性；就能源价格诱致性技术效率而言,部分FDI会分流至能源领域,促进技术水平的提升,RD投入、资本投入具有一定的挤占效应,RD人员数量、经济增长的规模、二氧化硫排放约束都对技术进步具有正的影响效应,能源消耗和二氧化碳排放约束则无显著影响。通过比较东中西部的情况,本文还发现三个地区由于经济发展水平和技术水平的差异,能源技术效率水平的波动存在一定的区域差异性。最后,本文结合实证分析的结论,对能源危机环境约束背景下,我国如何合理引导要素流动,有效推动区域技术创新,切实提高区域能源效率水平,积极推动环境友好型经济增长提出有益的政策基准
[Abstract]:How to utilize energy efficiently, integrate all kinds of resources scientifically and guide technological progress reasonably is one of the most important issues in the economic development of our country. Based on the potential laws of economic operation in China, this paper combines the theoretical vacancy of energy technology efficiency changes in the existing literature, and on the basis of synthetically considering the non-desirable output of the environment, The energy technology efficiency is decomposed into exogenous technical efficiency and energy price induced technical efficiency by the direction distance function, and the transition path of energy technology efficiency in China is discussed by investigating the influencing factors of the two factors. Using panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1997 to 2011, this paper measures the exogenous technical efficiency and the regional energy price induced technical efficiency, which only change with time. The results show that the fluctuation of energy technology efficiency in China has obvious temporal characteristics. Among them, the fluctuation direction of exogenous technical efficiency is related to the liquidity of factors, and there is cumulative effect. According to the strength of liquidity, there are three periods: negative growth stage in 1997-1999, zero growth stage in 2000-2002 and positive growth stage in 2003-2010. The law of energy price induced technical efficiency fluctuation is the same as that of energy price fluctuation on the whole, but there is a certain lag. According to the fluctuation range, it can be divided into the smaller fluctuation period in 1997-2006 and the larger fluctuation period in 2007-2010. The internal influence mechanism of energy technology efficiency is further studied through the analysis of influencing factors. It is found that, in terms of exogenous technical efficiency, the impact of FDI R D input is not significant, and there is a certain increase in the number of spontaneous R D personnel that speeds up the pace of technology research and development, and the technological progress driven by economic growth will result in the crowding out of exogenous technological efficiency. The increase of capital input will promote the improvement of technology level by improving the external environment, and the restriction of sulfur dioxide emissions will help to promote the upgrading of technology level in extensive growth regions, and the carbon dioxide emissions will show a significant negative correlation. As far as the energy price inductive technical efficiency is concerned, some FDI will be diverted to the energy field to promote the technical level of R D investment. The capital investment has a certain crowding effect on the number of R D personnel and the scale of economic growth. Sulfur dioxide emission constraints have a positive effect on technological progress, while energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission constraints have no significant effect. By comparing the situation of east, west and west, the paper also finds that there are some regional differences in the fluctuation of energy technology efficiency level due to the difference of economic development level and technology level in the three regions. Finally, based on the conclusion of empirical analysis, under the background of energy crisis and environment constraints, how to guide the flow of factors reasonably, effectively promote regional technological innovation, and improve the level of regional energy efficiency. Actively promote environmentally friendly economic growth and propose useful policy benchmarks
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：X24;F206;F124.3

【参考文献】