北极航线与传统航线地理区位优势的比较分析

发布时间：2018-11-03 19:44

【摘要】：在对样本港口和样本船型进行选择的基础上,运用海洋船舶航运利润核算方法,通过航运利润指标对北极航线和传统航线地理区位优势进行了比较分析。结果表明:(1)与传统航线相比,在北极航线需要破冰服务时,北极航线的航运利润高56%左右;在无需破冰服务时,北极航线的航运利润高105%左右;(2)在欧亚大陆西端的港口中,勒阿弗尔港以北港口至上海港选择北极航线更具地理区位比较优势,而其以南港口至上海港选择北极航线则处于劣势;在北美东海岸的港口中,纽约港以北港口至上海港选择北极航线更具比较优势,而其以南港口至上海港选择北极航线则处于劣势;(3)与北极航线需要破冰服务时相比,在无需破冰服务时,上海港至俄罗斯、法国(西北部)、加拿大、美国(东北部)、挪威和英国的港口,选择北极航线地理区位比较优势更大。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the selection of sample ports and ship types, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the geographical location advantages of Arctic routes and traditional routes by using the method of marine shipping profit accounting. The results show that: (1) compared with the traditional route, the shipping profit of the Arctic route is 56% higher than that of the traditional route, and that of the Arctic route is about 105% higher than that of the traditional route. (2) in the western end of Eurasia, the north port of Le Havre port to Shanghai port has the advantage of geographical location, while the south port to Shanghai port is at a disadvantage; In the port of North America's east coast, the north port of New York port to Shanghai port has a comparative advantage in choosing the Arctic route, while the south port to Shanghai port is at a disadvantage to choose the Arctic route. (III) the ports of Shanghai to Russia, France (north-west), Canada, the United States (north-eastern), Norway and the United Kingdom when ice breaking services are not required for Arctic routes, The choice of Arctic route geographical location comparative advantage is greater.
【作者单位】：上海海洋大学经济管理学院;
【基金】：上海市浦江人才计划“北极航道”开通与中国的潜在战略利益研究项目(14PJC061) 上海海洋大学骆肇荛科技创新基金(A10204001024)资助
【分类号】：F551

【相似文献】