贵州省各市州发展效率评价及其影响因素研究
[Abstract]:Guizhou Province is the main representative of the underdeveloped areas in the western part of our country, and is a relatively weak link in the economic environment of our country. It is of great practical significance to deeply discuss the present development situation and the influencing factors of Guizhou Province. There is a big gap between the rich and the poor between towns and villages in Guizhou Province. If we only study the situation of towns or villages, we can not fully understand the economic situation of Guizhou Province. The economic base determines the superstructure, and the overall rapid development of a region is bound to be supported by economic conditions, but development that does not take into account the cost will result in a large amount of waste of resources, even if the economic situation is significantly improved. It is also based on the sacrifice of the environment to destroy the ecology. Such development will eventually lead the economy to the brink of collapse, which obviously outweighs the gain. The development of economy should aim at high efficiency. Especially in the less developed western province, which is lack of resources, we should pursue high efficiency development as the goal. This paper takes 9 cities and states of Guizhou Province as the research object, studies the urban and rural economic development efficiency of these cities and states in 2011-2014, chooses the number of permanent resident population, the fixed asset investment, the agricultural sowing area at the end of the year. Road mileage and electricity consumption per unit of gross domestic product shall be taken as input indicators; and regional gross domestic product and tax revenue of comprehensive significance shall be selected, The per capita disposable income of urban and rural residents and the per capita net income of rural residents, which reflect the quality of life of urban and rural residents, are taken as output indicators together, and the relative efficiency of the development of cities and states is calculated by using the data envelopment analysis method. The optimal production state and development ideas are studied. In the concrete calculation process, combining the factor analysis method, the traditional data envelopment analysis method is used to analyze the technical efficiency, scale efficiency and scale reward of the urban and rural economic development of each city state, and the main factors influencing the development efficiency of each city state are further analyzed. In addition, by introducing the confrontational cross-evaluation strategy, the decision units which are effective in the traditional methods are further distinguished, and the calculated results of the two methods are compared. The comparison results demonstrate the rationality of the research method. In addition, the efficiency values of 9 cities and states in Guizhou Province are divided into three categories by cluster analysis, and the main factors that promote the development of these cities are studied. The results show that: on the one hand, although the overall economic development efficiency of Guizhou Province is improving and the economic development is on a benign track, at present, 2/3 of the cities and prefectures still have low or even ineffective technical efficiency; On the other hand, the main causes of low or ineffective technical efficiency are that pure technology is ineffective, scale is too large and scale is too small. The results show that: (1) the classification of 9 cities and states in Guizhou Province is relatively stable; (2) a large number of production factors are invested, and the production efficiency is maximized, so as to make the production results optimal. (3) the main reason for the differences in the development efficiency of different cities and states is the unreasonable structure of input elements.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F224;F127
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王志凌;邹林杰;;国家级贫困县“精准”扶贫效率评价——以广西27个县为例[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2016年04期
2 刘春志;胡雪玉;;基于DEA交叉模型的中国银行业效率研究[J];经济与管理;2016年04期
3 马明;高宇璇;;县域经济自我发展能力评价指标体系构建——以山西省为例[J];经济问题;2016年03期
4 孙钰;王坤岩;姚晓东;;基于DEA交叉效率模型的城市公共基础设施经济效益评价[J];中国软科学;2015年01期
5 许小平;;基于非参数检验的河南省城市发展效率实证研究[J];企业经济;2014年11期
6 辛督强;韩国秀;;因子分析法在科技期刊综合评价中的应用[J];数理统计与管理;2014年01期
7 梁j;吴杰;;数据包络分析(DEA)的交叉效率研究进展与展望[J];中国科学技术大学学报;2013年11期
8 许建伟;许新宇;陈兴鹏;崔理想;逯承鹏;薛冰;;基于DEA交叉模型的甘肃省城市效率评价[J];自然资源学报;2013年04期
9 陶小马;谭婧;陈旭;;考虑自然资源要素投入的城市效率评价研究——以长三角地区为例[J];中国人口.资源与环境;2013年01期
10 谢永琴;詹新叶;;基于DEA模型研究东北三省城市经济效率与城市化发展速度的协调性问题[J];特区经济;2012年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 周艳;城市效率及其影响因素研究[D];湘潭大学;2016年
2 包维虎;环渤海地区城市化效率评价及其区域差异研究[D];山东师范大学;2015年
3 许新宇;基于数据包络分析的甘肃省城市效率评价[D];兰州大学;2013年
4 朱若絮;我国商业银行竞争力研究[D];西南财经大学;2012年
5 李广文;“双三角洲”城市可持续发展能力研究[D];南京财经大学;2010年
6 徐大伟;基于循环经济的城市效率评价研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2009年
7 孔江;城市建设评价指标体系与方法研究[D];昆明理工大学;2002年
,本文编号:2201630
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/yysx/2201630.html