善:张弛于有序与无序之间——对一种简单以熵量为判据的荒诞伦理学的批判

发布时间：2018-04-29 14:52

  本文选题：价值 + 伦理　； 参考：《自然辩证法研究》2017年08期

【摘要】：弗洛里迪仅仅以熵量多少来评判善恶的伦理原则是建立在简单性和单极化思维方式的基础之上的。如果按照他所制定的对熵的绝对排斥的至善原则来实践的话,那么,在自然界和生物圈领域只能导致运动变化活力的终结,在人的思想和科学发展的领域只能导致僵化和停滞,在社会领域则只能导致法西斯式的专制集权体制。事物的有序化和无序化发展都是有极限的,熵和熵增并不就是绝对的"恶",信息和熵减也并不就是绝对的"善"。一个合理的伦理原则应当把诸如信息和熵、有序和无序、整体性和还原性、确定性和非确定性、决定论和非决定论、目的性和随机性、必然性和偶然性这些看似对立的因素兼容起来,并在这些相关对立因素之间保持某种合理的张力。
[Abstract]:Floridian's ethical principle of judging good and evil only by the amount of entropy is based on simplicity and unipolar thinking. If he practices the principle of absolute exclusion of entropy, then in nature and in the biosphere it can only lead to the end of the vitality of movement change, and in the field of human thought and scientific development, it can only lead to rigidity and stagnation. In the social sphere, it can only lead to fascist autocracy. There are limits to the ordered and disordered development of things, entropy and entropy increase is not absolute "evil", information and entropy reduction is not absolute "good". A reasonable ethical principle should include such principles as information and entropy, order and disorder, integrity and reducibility, certainty and uncertainty, determinism and non-determinism, purpose and randomness, Necessity and fortuitousness, which seem to be opposite factors, are compatible and maintain a reasonable tension between them.
【作者单位】： 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：2013年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“信息哲学的基础理论研究”(13AZD096)
【分类号】：B82-057
，

本文编号：1820401