马克思主义与道德关系的一种论争——塞耶斯对卢克斯的批评析论

发布时间：2018-12-12 12:19

【摘要】：卢克斯认为,马克思主义一方面拒斥道德,对社会进行一种科学的研究,另一方面又极富道德判断,这两者之间的矛盾只是一种似是而非的矛盾,只要将马克思主义视阈中的道德区分为法权的道德与解放的道德,并认识到马克思主义拒斥的只是法权的道德,而信奉的是解放的道德,这个似是而非的矛盾就迎刃而解了。塞耶斯对卢克斯的观点提出了明确的批评。塞耶斯认为,马克思主义是科学与价值的统一,马克思主义视阈中的道德只是历史的、相对的,而卢克斯却错误地割裂了科学与价值的关系,并基于对相对主义与绝对主义的非此即彼的选择而错误地将马克思主义视阈中的道德分割成了相对主义的法权道德与绝对主义的解放道德。实际上,塞耶斯不仅在多处误解了卢克斯,而且他本人既未能有效解决有关的道德问题,又始终摇摆在道德的相对主义与绝对主义之间。相反,卢克斯的观点对我们思考相关问题却具有极为重要的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Lux believes that Marxism, on the one hand, rejects morality, carries out a scientific study of society, and on the other hand is full of moral judgment. The contradiction between the two is only a paradoxical contradiction. As long as the moral in the Marxist perspective is divided into the morality of the right of law and the morality of liberation, and it is recognized that what Marxism rejects is the morality of the right of law, but what it believes in is the morality of liberation, the paradoxical contradiction can be easily solved. Seyes made a clear criticism of Lux's point of view. According to Seyes, Marxism is the unity of science and value, and the morality in the Marxist perspective is only historical and relative, while Lux mistakenly separates the relationship between science and value. And on the basis of the choice of either or to relativism and absolutism, the moral in the Marxist perspective is wrongly divided into the relativistic morality of legal right and the morality of liberating absolutism. In fact, Seyes not only misunderstood Lux in many ways, but also failed to solve the related moral problems effectively, and always swung between moral relativism and absolutism. On the contrary, Lux's view is of great significance for us to think about related issues.
【作者单位】：三峡大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学基金项目(10YJA720029)
【分类号】：B82-06

【共引文献】