法与道德的区别_规范逻辑的法律思考

发布时间：2016-11-22 07:30

  本文关键词：规范逻辑的法律思考，，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

规范逻辑的法律思考

     2009-7-11 11:34:18     来源：     

　　论文标题规范逻辑的法律思考
Legal Reflection of Normative Logic
论文作者丁永强
论文导师李振江,论文学位硕士,论文专业逻辑学
论文单位河南大学,点击次数11,论文页数36页File Size407k
2005-05-01规范逻辑;规范逻辑悖论;法律
Normative logic; Paradox of normative logic; law
规范逻辑是关于“应当”,“允许”等规范模态词的逻辑,又称为道义逻辑,它是广义模态逻辑的一个分支。规范逻辑在我国的研究起步很晚,最近才有学者对它进行研究。我们在这一领域与国外的差距很大。究其原因,既有规范逻辑自身的原因,如规范逻辑悖论的困扰,规范逻辑没有能够建立一个令人信服的系统等;也与人们对规范逻辑的重要性理解不够有很大的关系。其实,规范逻辑的研究不论从逻辑学的角度,还是从法律科学的角度来说都有着十分重要的意义。规范逻辑的研究特色是把法律作为对象语言进行研究,而把形式语言作为研究对象语言的语言,即元语言,来研究法律基本概念、法律规范以及它们之间的关系,以使法律体系变成一个内在一致的系统,消除法律体系内的矛盾。这种研究方法实际上是一种“元法学”研究方法,它为法学的研究提供了一种全新的手段和分析工具。本文正是试图挖掘出规范逻辑对于法律科学研究的重要意义,它共分五个部分:第一部分主要是对规范逻辑的发展史做一些简要的陈述,它是下面部分的历史知识的准备。第二部分主要是对冯·赖特的一元规范命题逻辑做一个概述,并从法律科学的角度对其中若干定理做一些评论。第三部分主要是对标准的二元规范命题逻辑做一个概述,再从法律科学的角度对其中若干定理做一些评论。第四部分首先对安德森的规范命题逻辑做一个概述,然后对其中若干定理做一些法律评论。第五部分主要从法律角度对二元规范命题逻辑做一些简要的评论。
Normative logic (also called deontic logic), which is about the logic ofobligation, permission and such norm modality, is a branch of broad modal logic. Theresearch on normative logic in China is not for a long time. Only recently somescholars begin to study it. Comparing with western countries, our study in this fieldlag behind. One of the reasons lies in normative logic itself, such as in its paradox orin its inconvincible system. Another reason lies in the fact that less attention has been paid to it. In fact, thestudy of normative logic is very important no matter in the view of logic itself or inthe view of the science of law. Normative logic takes law as its object language tostudy, while takes formal language as metalanguage to study the essential concept oflaw and legal norms and their inner relationship, so as to make the law an innerconsistent system and remove the contradiction. It becomes a new, analyzing tool forthe study of law. The article just tries hard to analyse the importance of normative logic to thestudy of law. The article is organized into five parts: The first part is a brief introduction to the development of normative logic. The second part is a summary of Von Wright’s one-place normativepropositional logic and analysis of some theorem of it from the science of law. The third is a summary of the standard one-place normative propositional logicand analysis of some theorem of it from the science of law. The fourth is a summary of Anderson’s normative propositional logic andanalysis of some theorem of it from the science of law. The last part is analysis of dyadic normative propositional logic from the scienceof law.

  本文关键词：规范逻辑的法律思考，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

本文编号：185308