判断聚合的可接受性问题研究
发布时间：2019-02-28 10:56
【摘要】：重点讨论群体决策的理性可接受性问题。在以讨论"可行能力"为核心的理性选择理论范畴下,提出了一种群体理性可接受性的概念,它既避免了将群体作为个体抽象物进行重建的弊端,又对经典的群体判断聚合困境提供了比较合理的解决途径;但同时发现,这样的群体理性条件导致一些违反人们群体决策常识的问题出现,比如,它为少数决定制的群体决策规则做出了合理性辩护。进一步刻画群体决策规则合理性和群体决策结果合理性之间的不一致性,对于判断聚合理论、协商民主理论,以及如何在多元社会现实背景下实现共识具有积极的理论意义和现实意义。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the rational acceptability of group decision-making. This paper puts forward a concept of group rational acceptability under the category of rational choice theory, which focuses on the discussion of "feasible ability", which avoids the drawback of rebuilding the group as an individual abstract substance. At the same time, it provides a reasonable way to solve the classical group judgment and aggregation dilemma. But at the same time, it is found that the condition of group rationality leads to some problems that violate people's common sense of group decision-making, for example, it justifies the rule of group decision-making which is customized to minority decision-making. Further characterizing the inconsistency between the rationality of group decision-making rules and the rationality of group decision-making results, for judging aggregation theory and negotiation democracy theory, And how to achieve consensus under the background of multi-social reality has positive theoretical and practical significance.
【作者单位】： 中山大学哲学系、中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“广义非形式逻辑研究”(12JJD720006)
【分类号】：B819
本文编号：2431746
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the rational acceptability of group decision-making. This paper puts forward a concept of group rational acceptability under the category of rational choice theory, which focuses on the discussion of "feasible ability", which avoids the drawback of rebuilding the group as an individual abstract substance. At the same time, it provides a reasonable way to solve the classical group judgment and aggregation dilemma. But at the same time, it is found that the condition of group rationality leads to some problems that violate people's common sense of group decision-making, for example, it justifies the rule of group decision-making which is customized to minority decision-making. Further characterizing the inconsistency between the rationality of group decision-making rules and the rationality of group decision-making results, for judging aggregation theory and negotiation democracy theory, And how to achieve consensus under the background of multi-social reality has positive theoretical and practical significance.
【作者单位】： 中山大学哲学系、中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“广义非形式逻辑研究”(12JJD720006)
【分类号】：B819
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 官鸣;论科学认识的可接受性[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年02期
2 陈晓平;;关于科学理论的可接受性——归纳和反归纳之争[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
3 胡毅敏;徐慈华;;类比论证的形式表征与语用维度[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2011年08期
，本文编号：2431746
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2431746.html
