排他性论证与对应关系——以“反事实条件句分析”为例
发布时间：2019-03-17 11:04
【摘要】：在排他性论证的讨论中,班尼特、钟磊等人从反事实条件句出发展开讨论。本文以他们的"反事实条件句分析"为例,考察了排他性论证中的附生性和因果关系,认为它们都只表达了一种对应关系。所以,从对应关系的层面重构排他性论证及相关讨论,对于把握排他性问题的本质是有益的。进一步的分析表明,排他性论证之所以成立,是因为人们等同地处理了精神因果和物理因果。但是物理因果发生在空间中,精神因果则不是,正是对它们的等同处理导致了排他性论证中的冲突。
[Abstract]:In the discussion of exclusivity, Bennett, Zhong Lei and others start from the anti-fact conditional sentence. Taking their analysis of counterfactual conditional sentences as an example, this paper examines the affinities and causal relationships in exclusivity argumentation, and considers that they all express only one kind of corresponding relation. Therefore, the reconstruction of exclusivity from the level of correspondence is beneficial to grasp the essence of exclusivity. Further analysis shows that exclusivity argument holds because people deal with mental causality and physical cause and effect equally. But physical causality occurs in space, but spiritual causality is not. It is the equivalent treatment of them that leads to conflicts in exclusivity argument.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“高科技伦理问题研究”(项目编号:12&ZD117)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B812
本文编号：2442231
[Abstract]:In the discussion of exclusivity, Bennett, Zhong Lei and others start from the anti-fact conditional sentence. Taking their analysis of counterfactual conditional sentences as an example, this paper examines the affinities and causal relationships in exclusivity argumentation, and considers that they all express only one kind of corresponding relation. Therefore, the reconstruction of exclusivity from the level of correspondence is beneficial to grasp the essence of exclusivity. Further analysis shows that exclusivity argument holds because people deal with mental causality and physical cause and effect equally. But physical causality occurs in space, but spiritual causality is not. It is the equivalent treatment of them that leads to conflicts in exclusivity argument.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“高科技伦理问题研究”(项目编号:12&ZD117)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B812
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 熊晓建;;可能世界中反事实条件句的逻辑分析[J];毕节学院学报;2008年01期
2 曾庆福;;论反事实条件句[J];昆明学院学报;2008年03期
3 胡怀亮;;反事实条件句与覆盖律则理论[J];自然辩证法通讯;2013年06期
4 秦姗姗;;反事实条件句初探[J];神州;2013年14期
5 陈晓平;科学定律与反事实条件句——兼论“新归纳之谜”[J];自然辩证法研究;2001年07期
6 王小溪;;反事实条件句辨析[J];语文学刊;2014年18期
7 付瑶;;论古德曼反事实条件句难题[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2011年08期
8 王莹莹;李宝伦;;反事实语境中的动态变化（英文）[J];逻辑学研究;2013年03期
9 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 万明;基于预设理论的反事实条件句分析[D];西南大学;2013年
2 季方舟;大卫—刘易斯的反事实条件句理论[D];华东师范大学;2009年
3 付瑶;论古德曼反事实条件句难题[D];北京化工大学;2011年
4 冯晶晶;D·刘易斯反事实条件句思想研究[D];云南师范大学;2013年
5 倪晓岚;N·古德曼的反事实条件句思想研究[D];云南师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2442231
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2442231.html
