论我国人大人事任免听证制度的构建

发布时间：2018-01-21 05:11

  本文关键词： 人大 人事任免权 人事任免听证 听证制度 构建　出处：《苏州大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：人事任免听证制度在西方国家历史悠久，而在我国的理论与实践研究方面尚处探索阶段。随着我国民主法治的发展，公民参政议政能力的提高，国家公权力的行使也日趋透明化、法制化，这为人大人事任免权的行使提出了更高的要求。人事任免听证制度的构建正是契合了这样的发展需求与趋势。本文首先从听证的由来说起，介绍西方代议制国家人事任免听证的含义与特征，从而界定我国人大人事任免听证制度的涵义。其次，从民主宪政、人大任免权威、官员的素质、拟任免人员权利四大方面论述了人大人事任免听证制度构建的意义。再次，重点考察美国、韩国、我国台湾地区的人事任免听证经验。最后，围绕人事任免听证的范围、主体、程序、结果等方面，，阐述我国人大人事任免听证制度构建的内容，并提出可操作的听证规程。
[Abstract]:The system of personnel appointment and removal hearing has a long history in western countries, but in our country's theoretical and practical research is still in the exploration stage. With the development of democracy and rule of law in China, citizens' ability to participate in political affairs has been improved. The exercise of national public power is becoming more transparent and legalized. This puts forward higher requirements for the people's Congress to exercise the power of appointment and removal. The construction of the personnel appointment and removal hearing system is in line with such development needs and trends. Firstly, this paper begins with the origin of the hearing. This paper introduces the meaning and characteristics of the hearing of appointment and removal of personnel in the representative system of western countries, so as to define the meaning of the hearing system of appointment and removal of personnel of the people's Congress of our country. This paper discusses the significance of the construction of the personnel appointment and removal hearing system in the people's Congress. Thirdly, it focuses on the experience of the personnel appointment and removal hearing in the United States, South Korea and Taiwan. Finally. Based on the scope, subject, procedure and result of the personnel appointment and removal hearing, this paper expounds the contents of the construction of the personnel appointment and removal hearing system of the National people's Congress of our country, and puts forward the operable hearing rules.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D921.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 陈洪波;沈斌;;论听证制度在地方人大工作中的应用(下)[J];楚天主人;2006年10期

2 余跃进;;在实践中规范 在规范中创新——宜昌市人大常委会实践和探索人事任免工作的几点作法[J];楚天主人;2003年08期

3 杨海坤;关于行政听证制度若干问题的研讨[J];江苏社会科学;1998年01期

4 彭宗超,薛澜,沈旭晖;国外立法听证制度的比较分析[J];政治学研究;2003年01期

5 黎赐锦,郑毅生,汤黎明;地方人大及其常委会听证制度研究[J];人大研究;2003年12期

6 季金华;宪政视角下的听证权初探[J];法学论坛;2005年06期

7 蔡定剑;;国外议会立法听证简述[J];山东人大工作;2002年03期

8 王维国;在与人事任免权相结合中实现监督权的制约职能——人大“海淀现象”解读[J];人大研究;2005年02期

本文编号：1450565