我国重大行政执法决定法制审核研究
发布时间:2018-01-31 04:52
本文关键词: 重大 行政执法决定 法制审核 审核制度 审核主体 审核程序 审核意见 出处:《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:我国重大行政执法决定法制审核是指外部法制机构按照一定的程序和标准对重大行政执法的过程和拟处理结果进行合法性、合理性审查,并提出书面审核意见的一种行政行为。重大行政执法决定法制审核是通过我国长期行政执法实践的一大创举,有利于健全重大行政执法程序机制,根本目的是保障重大行政执法严格、公正。重大行政执法决定法制审核作为一种事前审核机制,不同于行政复议、行政诉讼、备案审查等事后审核机制;它具有独特的属性,必须遵循一定的原则,具有重要的社会价值。但是,由于制度不健全以及理论研究和实践经验的欠缺,我国重大行政执法决定法制审核还存在较多的问题。因此,需要从理论上进行系统研究,建立健全重大行政执法决定法制审核制度,为法制审核实践提供理论和制度依据。本文采用实证和理论分析等方法尝试着对相关理论进行研究,为我国重大行政执法决定法制审核制度的构建和法制审核实践提供理论支撑。笔者从以下五个方面展开研究。第一,介绍研究的背景、现状与方法。第二,探讨我国重大行政执法决定法制审核的内涵、与相关制度的区别、属性、原则、主要内容,为下文深入探讨奠定理论基础。第三,主要探讨我国重大行政执法决定法制审核的社会价值,包括维护执法相对人权利、夯实政府合法性基础、监督执法职责的履行、提升行政执法公信力、加快建设法治政府、实现良好社会治理六个方面。重大行政执法决定法制审核的社会价值,是构建重大行政执法决定法制审核制度的理论基础和价值导向。第四,主要探讨我国重大行政执法决定法制审核存在的问题及其原因,这是构建重大行政执法决定法制审核制度的现实要求,可以有针对性的解决相关问题。第五,对我国重大行政执法决定法制审核制度进行构想与展望,主要包括明确审核主体、完善审核程序、明确审核内容、提出审核意见、追究审核责任五个方面。这是本文要解决的主要问题,是本文的主要创新点。
[Abstract]:China's major administrative law enforcement decisions legal review refers to the external legal institutions in accordance with certain procedures and standards of major administrative law enforcement process and intended to deal with the process of legitimacy, rationality review. And put forward written audit opinions of an administrative act. Major administrative law enforcement decisions legal review is through our long-term administrative law enforcement practice of a major initiative, conducive to the improvement of major administrative law enforcement procedures mechanism. The fundamental purpose is to ensure that the major administrative law enforcement is strict and fair. As a prior audit mechanism, the legal review of major administrative law enforcement decisions is different from the ex post audit mechanism such as administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation, record checking and so on. It has the unique attribute, must follow certain principle, has the important social value, but, because the system is not perfect and the theory research and the practice experience lacks. There are still many problems in the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct systematic research in theory to establish and improve the legal audit system of major administrative law enforcement decisions. To provide theoretical and institutional basis for the practice of legal audit. This paper uses empirical and theoretical analysis methods to try to study the relevant theories. This paper provides theoretical support for the construction and practice of the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision in China. Firstly, it introduces the background, current situation and methods of the research. Second, the author carries out the research from the following five aspects. This paper discusses the connotation, characteristics, principles and main contents of the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China, and lays a theoretical foundation for the following in-depth discussion. This paper mainly discusses the social value of legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decisions in China, including safeguarding the rights of law enforcement counterpart, consolidating the legitimate foundation of the government, supervising the implementation of law enforcement duties, and enhancing the credibility of administrative law enforcement. Accelerate the construction of a government ruled by law to achieve good social governance in six aspects. Major administrative law enforcement determines the social value of legal audit. It is the theoretical basis and value orientation of establishing the legal audit system of major administrative law enforcement decision. 4th, it mainly discusses the problems and causes of the legal audit of major administrative law enforcement decision in our country. This is the realistic requirement of constructing the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision. It can solve the related problems. 5th, and the conception and prospect of the legal audit system of the major administrative law enforcement decision in our country. It mainly includes five aspects: clear audit subject, perfect audit procedure, clear audit content, put forward audit opinion, investigate audit responsibility. This is the main problem to be solved in this paper, and is the main innovation of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈驰;张驹;;行政复议的逻辑[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2016年04期
2 张渝田;熊宇;;论依法行政的逻辑结构[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2015年04期
3 关保英;;论具体行政行为程序合法的内涵与价值[J];政治与法律;2015年06期
4 黄学贤;;法治政府的内在特征及其实现——《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》解读[J];江苏社会科学;2015年01期
5 雷磊;;法律程序为什么重要? 反思现代社会中程序与法治的关系[J];中外法学;2014年02期
6 杜欣霖;;完善重大行政决策合法性审查机制[J];行政管理改革;2014年02期
7 姜晓萍;;国家治理现代化进程中的社会治理体制创新[J];中国行政管理;2014年02期
8 刘贵祥;;漫谈人民群众看得见的司法公正[J];人民司法;2013年11期
9 陈鹏;;重大具体行政行为备案审查制度的规范阐释[J];政治与法律;2012年05期
10 刘云甫;;重大行政许可备案审查的法律依据、不足及改进[J];广东行政学院学报;2012年02期
,本文编号:1478249
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/1478249.html