法治政府中行政裁量的功能与治理

发布时间：2018-03-21 06:14

本文选题：法治政府　切入点：善治　出处：《吉林大学》2010年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 政府是社会自身演化出来的必要的功能性实体,为完成其承担的政府义务和责任就必须具有相应的权力,即公共权力。在公共权力行使中,有两种基本要素——严格按照法律的要素和自由裁量的要素,这表明,行政裁量是公共权力行使的典型特征和内在要素:其正确和正当行使,可以有效弥补立法机关的立法不足、司法机关事后监督的缺陷,更能及时有效地实现人权保护和福利国家的福利行政给付等善治目标。然而,虽然裁量是法治政府要素中所必然具有的核心性成分,但是,从纯粹的法律逻辑关系建构角度看,裁量权犹如隐藏在法治背后的“特洛伊木马”,是法治屋顶之上的巨大的窟窿:裁量之治与法治的规则之治,有着天然的拒斥关系。如何有效发挥行政裁量的灵活性、目的性、应变性、以很好地弥补法律规则的局限性的正向功能的同时,又对之进行有效约束、确保其正确和正当行使,以形成行政裁量与现代法治的共生共荣的兼容关系,无疑是现代法治国家都必须着力解决的重大理论和实践问题。本文以实证研究方法为基本研究方法,并结合后现代法学的基本理论和研究方法对之进行了深入浅出的分析:剖析了裁量的涵义、裁量与法治和法治政府的关系,并提出了治理行政裁量危害的具体策略和制度选择。具体说来就是,在取消不必要的裁量,制约必要的裁量的基础目标上,以中国国情为背景,在不预设和凸出某一种行政裁量治理模式基础上,实证分析立法-行政-司法和非正式国家权力对行政裁量的约束实效,由此主张应当谨慎对待以人民法院司法审查为主的通行的行政裁量治理模式,发展多元行政裁量的治理模式,以实现和谐善治的治理目标。
[Abstract]:The government is a necessary functional entity evolved by the society itself. In order to fulfill its governmental obligations and responsibilities, it must have the corresponding power, that is, the public power. There are two basic elements-strictly according to the elements of the law and the elements of discretion, which show that administrative discretion is the typical and intrinsic feature of the exercise of public power: its correct and proper exercise can effectively compensate for the legislative insufficiency of the legislature. The defects of the judicial supervision after the event can more effectively realize the goals of good governance such as the protection of human rights and the welfare administration of the welfare state in a timely and effective manner. However, although discretion is the core element in the elements of the rule of law government, however, From the perspective of pure legal logic relationship construction, discretion is like a Trojan horse hidden behind the rule of law, which is a huge hole in the roof of the rule of law: the rule of discretion and the rule of law. There is a natural rejection relationship. How to effectively exert the flexibility, purpose and change of administrative discretion, so as to make up for the positive function of the limitation of legal rules, and at the same time effectively restrain it and ensure its correct and proper exercise. In order to form the compatible relationship between administrative discretion and modern rule of law, it is undoubtedly a major theoretical and practical problem that all modern countries under the rule of law must focus on. This paper takes the empirical research method as the basic research method. Combined with the basic theories and research methods of postmodern law, the author analyzes the meaning of discretion, the relationship between discretion and the rule of law and the government by law. And put forward the specific strategy and system choice to control the harm of administrative discretion. Specifically, in the basic goal of eliminating unnecessary discretion and restricting necessary discretion, the background of China's national conditions is taken as the background. On the basis of not presupposing and protruding a certain administrative discretion governance model, this paper empirically analyzes the binding effect of lawmaking-administrative-judicial and informal state power on administrative discretion. Therefore, we should treat the administrative discretion governance mode which is based on the judicial review of the people's court with caution and develop the multivariate administrative discretion governance mode in order to realize the governance goal of harmonious and good governance.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.1

【引证文献】