服务型政府视域下的行政责任问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 23:12

本文选题：服务型政府 + 行政责任　；参考：《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：服务型政府作为一种新型的政府治理模式,是我国在反思历史、面对现实问题和寻求未来发展中的新思维新探索,它内在的包涵了法治政府、责任政府、有限政府等政府发展方向。服务型政府具有公民本位、服务导向、效率与公平统一、回应性与前瞻性等特征,公民与政府关系的新界定是它同统治型政府与管制型政府的本质区别。服务型政府的建设是一项宏大的系统工作,而政府责任即行政责任是这项工程的关键。行政责任内涵丰富,从结构形式上看分为政治责任、法律责任、组织责任和道德责任,不同的行政时期,行政责任各有特点,而人民主权理论、治理与善治理论和新公共服务理论奠定了服务型政府责任的理论基础。经济、生态和社会的平衡可持续发展,法律保驾护航、社会文明和谐,公共服务质量提高,社会公平正义,社会管理民主公开等已成为当前服务型政府建设过程中凸显出的责任内容,是民众对政府的强烈诉求。公共利益和社会公正是政府责任的价值核心和偏向,政府是公民和社会的政府,政府的一切责任指向人民,承担起关乎人民切身利益的民生责任是政府责任重心所在,政民双向互动是尊重人民意愿、发挥人民的主动性和创造性的基本保障。服务型政府的责任定位是公民诉求也是政府自身的目标,但在通往目标的路上免不了崎岖和坎坷。传统行政文化与理念的负面影响、行政人员行政责任冲突的制约、行政责任本身的制度性缺陷、公民社会发育不足等障碍导致了行政主体责任意识淡薄、公共服务精神缺乏、公共权力异化、行政责任对象选择错误、行政责任内容缺失或主次颠倒等一系列行政责任失范现象,这是与服务政府责任定位的差距也是责任改善途中的困境。系统全面的行政责任体制的构建是确保服务型政府责任落实的关键途径,树立服务型政府行政理念、内化行政人员的行政伦理责任、完善政府相关责任制度、合理界定政府与外部的责任关系等多维度的内容既涵盖了服务型政府的特征,也结合了行政责任内外部控制的角度,是落实行政责任与构建服务型政府的契合。
[Abstract]:As a new mode of government governance, service-oriented government is a new thinking and new exploration in reflecting on history, facing realistic problems and seeking for future development in our country. It contains the government ruled by law and the responsible government. Limited government and other government development direction. The service-oriented government has the characteristics of citizen orientation, service orientation, efficiency and fairness unity, responsiveness and foresight, etc. The new definition of the relationship between citizen and government is the essential difference between it and the ruling government and the regulatory government. The construction of service-oriented government is a great systematic work, and the responsibility of government is the key of the project. The connotation of administrative responsibility is rich, which can be divided into political responsibility, legal responsibility, organizational responsibility and moral responsibility. In different administrative periods, administrative responsibility has its own characteristics, while the theory of people's sovereignty, The theory of governance and good governance and the theory of new public service lay the theoretical foundation for the responsibility of service-oriented government. The balanced and sustainable development of economy, ecology and society, the protection of law, the harmony of social civilization, the improvement of the quality of public service, the fairness and justice of society, Democracy and openness of social management have become the responsibility content in the process of construction of service-oriented government, which is the strong appeal of the public to the government. Public interest and social justice are the value core and bias of government responsibility. The government is the government of citizen and society. All the responsibilities of government are directed to the people, and the responsibility of people's livelihood is the focus of government responsibility. The two-way interaction between the government and the people is the basic guarantee to respect the will of the people and give play to the initiative and creativity of the people. The responsibility orientation of service-oriented government is also the goal of the government itself, but the road to the goal is bumpy and bumpy. The negative influence of traditional administrative culture and idea, the restriction of administrative responsibility conflict, the institutional defect of administrative responsibility and the lack of development of civil society lead to the weak sense of responsibility of administrative subject and the lack of public service spirit. Dissimilation of public power, wrong choice of object of administrative responsibility, lack of content of administrative responsibility or reversal of primary and secondary administrative responsibility are a series of abnormal phenomena of administrative responsibility, which is the gap between the orientation of responsibility of service government and the position of responsibility of service government, which is also the dilemma on the way of responsibility improvement. The systematic and comprehensive construction of the administrative responsibility system is the key way to ensure the implementation of the service-oriented government responsibility, to establish the service-oriented government administrative concept, to internalize the administrative ethical responsibility of the administrative personnel, and to perfect the relevant responsibility system of the government. The reasonable definition of the relationship between government and external responsibility covers not only the characteristics of service-oriented government, but also the angle of internal and external control of administrative responsibility, which is the agreement between implementing administrative responsibility and constructing service-oriented government.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】